DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Which factors related to apical radiolucency may influence its radiographic detection? A study using CBCT as reference standard

  • Received : 2020.10.26
  • Accepted : 2021.02.02
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the detection rate of apical radiolucencies in 2-dimensional images using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as the reference standard, and to determine which factors related to the apical radiolucencies and the teeth could influence its detection. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of exams of patients who had panoramic (PAN) and/or periapical (PERI) radiography and CBCT. The exams were assessed by 2 oral radiologists and divided into PAN+CBCT (227 teeth-285 roots) and PERI+CBCT (94 teeth-115 roots). Radiographic images were evaluated for the presence of apical radiolucency, while CBCT images were assessed for presence, size, location, and involvement of the cortical bone (thinning, expansion, and destruction). Diagnostic values were obtained for PERI and PAN. Results: PERI and PAN presented high accuracy (0.83 and 0.77, respectively) and specificity (0.89 and 0.91, respectively), but low sensitivity, especially for PAN (0.40 vs. 0.65 of PERI). The size of the apical radiolucency was positively correlated with its detection in PERI and PAN (p < 0.001). For PAN, apical radiolucencies were 3.93 times more frequently detected when related to single-rooted teeth (p = 0.038). The other factors did not influence apical radiolucency detection (p > 0.05). Conclusions: PERI presents slightly better accuracy than PAN for the detection of apical radiolucency. The size is the only factor related to radiolucency that influences its detection, for both radiographic exams. For PAN, apical radiolucency is most often detected in single-rooted teeth.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was financed in part by PIBIC/CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) and the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.

References

  1. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Azevedo BC, Azevedo JR, Pecora JD. A new periapical index based on cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2008;34:1325-1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.013
  2. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, Azevedo B, Azevedo JR. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod 2008;34:273-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.023
  3. de Freitas JV, Baratto-Filho F, Coelho BS, Tomazinho FSF, Crozeta BM, de Sousa Neto MD, Gabardo MCL. Efficacy of different cone-beam computed tomographic protocols in the identification of mesiobuccal canals of maxillary first molars: a tomographic and ex vivo study. J Endod 2017;43:810-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.011
  4. Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2009;42:463-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01531.x
  5. Moura MS, Guedes OA, De Alencar AH, Azevedo BC, Estrela C. Influence of length of root canal obturation on apical periodontitis detected by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2009;35:805-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.013
  6. Durack C, Patel S. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Braz Dent J 2012;23:179-191. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000300001
  7. Patel S, Brown J, Pimentel T, Kelly RD, Abella F, Durack C. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics - a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2019;52:1138-1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13115
  8. Pope O, Sathorn C, Parashos P. A comparative investigation of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of a healthy periapex. J Endod 2014;40:360-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.003
  9. Nardi C, Calistri L, Pradella S, Desideri I, Lorini C, Colagrande S. Accuracy of orthopantomography for apical periodontitis without endodontic treatment. J Endod 2017;43:1640-1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.020
  10. Nardi C, Calistri L, Grazzini G, Desideri I, Lorini C, Occhipinti M, Mungai F, Colagrande S. Is panoramic radiography an accurate imaging technique for the detection of endodontically treated asymptomatic apical periodontitis? J Endod 2018;44:1500-1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.003
  11. Esposito S, Cardaropoli M, Cotti E. A suggested technique for the application of the cone beam computed tomography periapical index. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:506-512. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/78881369
  12. Kapila R, Harada N, Araki K, Sano T, Goto TK. Evaluation of juxta-apical radiolucency in cone beam CT images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014;43:20130402.
  13. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Foschi F, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up. Int Endod J 2012;45:711-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02076.x
  14. Davies A, Mannocci F, Mitchell P, Andiappan M, Patel S. The detection of periapical pathoses in root filled teeth using single and parallax periapical radiographs versus cone beam computed tomography - a clinical study. Int Endod J 2015;48:582-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12352
  15. Lopez FU, Kopper PM, Cucco C, Della Bona A, de Figueiredo JA, Vier-Pelisser FV. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in apical periodontitis diagnosis. J Endod 2014;40:2057-2060.
  16. Kanagasingam S, Lim CX, Yong CP, Mannocci F, Patel S. Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in detecting apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a reference standard. Int Endod J 2017;50:417-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12650
  17. Abella F, Patel S, Duran-Sindreu F, Mercade M, Bueno R, Roig M. An evaluation of the periapical status of teeth with necrotic pulps using periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2014;47:387-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12159
  18. Kanagasingam S, Hussaini HM, Soo I, Baharin S, Ashar A, Patel S. Accuracy of single and parallax film and digital periapical radiographs in diagnosing apical periodontitis - a cadaver study. Int Endod J 2017;50:427-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12651
  19. Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A, Kirkevang LL. Cone beam computed tomography and periapical lesions: a systematic review analysing studies on diagnostic efficacy by a hierarchical model. Int Endod J 2015;48:815-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12388
  20. Bender IB. Factors influencing the radiographic appearance of bony lesions. J Endod 1997;23:5-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80199-9
  21. Bender IB, Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: II. 1961. J Endod 2003;29:707-712.