DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

YouTube as a source of information about pulpotomy and pulp capping: a cross sectional reliability analysis

  • Konstantinos Kodonas (Department of Endodontology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) ;
  • Anastasia Fardi (Department of Dentoalveolar Surgery, Surgical Implantology & Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
  • Received : 2021.03.10
  • Accepted : 2021.05.06
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the quality, reliability and educational content of the information of vital pulp treatment videos available on YouTube. Materials and Methods: The keywords "pulpotomy" and "pulp capping" were searched on YouTube on 5th July 2020, until 60 English language videos of each search term with a duration shorter than 15 minutes were acquired. Video characteristics were recorded and Video Power Index (VPI) was calculated. Reliability and educational quality of videos were evaluated using the Modified DISCERN score, the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria and Global Quality Scores (GQS). Videos were categorized by uploading source. Results: Regarding pulpotomy, 31.7% of the videos were uploaded by specialists and 68.3% were directed by non-specialists. In the case of pulp capping, the corresponding percentages were 45% and 55%, respectively. Videos uploaded by specialists had significantly higher modified DISCERN, JAMA and GQS scores compared to those uploaded by non-specialists. Endodontists tended to have the highest reliability and VPI scores. Conclusions: YouTube videos on vital pulp treatment contain low educational quality or incomplete information. Low popularity of dental pulp capping and pulpotomy videos may be attributed to the specialized nature of these procedures. As YouTube represents an important source for patient information about different health topics, reliable informative videos should be uploaded by specialized dental professionals.

Keywords

References

  1. Parashos P, Messer HH. The diffusion of innovation in dentistry: a review using rotary nickel-titanium technology as an example. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:395-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.064
  2. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003. 
  3. AlFaris E, Irfan F, Ponnamperuma G, Jamal A, Van der Vleuten C, Al Maflehi N, Al-Qeas S, Alenezi A, Alrowaished M, Alsalman R, Ahmed AM. The pattern of social media use and its association with academic performance among medical students. Med Teach 2018;40 Supplement 1:S77-S82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1465536
  4. Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, Keith JN, Rosenbaum ME, Kapadia MR. YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J Surg Educ 2016;73:1072-1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.024
  5. Tackett S, Slinn K, Marshall T, Gaglani S, Waldman V, Desai R. medical education videos for the world: an analysis of viewing patterns for a YouTube channel. Acad Med 2018;93:1150-1156. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002118
  6. Wiid J, Cant MC, Nell C. Open distance learning students' perception of the use of social media networking systems as an educational tool. IBER 2013;12:867-882. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v12i8.7985
  7. Fox S, Purcell K. Chronic disease and the internet [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center; 2010]. Available from: www.pewinternet.org/2010/03/24/chronic-disease-and-the-internet/. Updated 2020 Jul 12. 
  8. Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Waligora J, Mastalerz-Migas A. The internet as a source of health information and services. Adv Exp Med Biol 2019;1211:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2019_396
  9. Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Wegierek P. The impact of online health information on patient health behaviours and making decisions concerning health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:880.
  10. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015;21:173-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458213512220
  11. Nason GJ, Kelly P, Kelly ME, Burke MJ, Aslam A, Giri SK, Flood HD. YouTube as an educational tool regarding male urethral catheterization. Scand J Urol 2015;49:189-192. https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2014.975837
  12. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2016;49:1194-1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12575
  13. Radonjic A, Fat Hing NN, Harlock J, Naji F. YouTube as a source of patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2020;71:637-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.230
  14. Ng CH, Lim GR, Fong W. Quality of English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheum Dis 2020;23:1636-1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.13852
  15. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine 2018;43:E1334-E1339. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691
  16. Eksi Ozsoy H. Evaluation of YouTube videos about smile design using the DISCERN tool and Journal of the American Medical Association benchmarks. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:151-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.016
  17. BroadbandSearch.net. Average daily time on YouTube [Internet]. Available from: https://www.broadbandsearch.net/blog/average-daily-time-on-social-media#post-navigation-4. Updated 2021. 
  18. Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube TM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2018;23:e463-e468.
  19. Fortuna G, Schiavo JH, Aria M, Mignogna MD, Klasser GD. The usefulness of YouTubeTM videos as a source of information on burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Rehabil 2019;46:657-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12796
  20. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016;22:202-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12434
  21. Hutchison CM, Cave V, Walshaw EG, Burns B, Park C. YouTubeTM as a source for patient education about the management of dental avulsion injuries. Dent Traumatol 2020;36:207-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12517
  22. Gas S, Zincir OO, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:1776-1783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.004
  23. Crespo-Gallardo I, Hay-Levytska O, Martin-Gonzalez J, Jimenez-Sanchez MC, Sanchez-Dominguez B, Segura-Egea JJ. Criteria and treatment decisions in the management of deep caries lesions: Is there endodontic overtreatment? J Clin Exp Dent 2018;10:e751-e760.
  24. Croft K, Kervanto-Seppala S, Stangvaltaite L, Kerosuo E. Management of deep carious lesions and pulps exposed during carious tissue removal in adults: a questionnaire study among dentists in Finland. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:1271-1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2556-1
  25. Ozdal Zincir O, Bozkurt AP, Gas S. Potential patient education of YouTube videos related to wisdom tooth surgical removal. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:e481-e484. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005573
  26. Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. YouTubeTM as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod 2017;44:90-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2017.1319010
  27. Lena Y, Dindaroglu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTubeTM video analysis. Angle Orthod 2018;88:208-214. https://doi.org/10.2319/090717-602.1
  28. Guo J, Yan X, Li S, Van der Walt J, Guan G, Mei L. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube. Angle Orthod 2020;90:411-418. https://doi.org/10.2319/082019-542.1
  29. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One 2013;8:e82469.