Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제46권2호
  • /
  • Pages.30.1-30.13
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microleakage and characteristics of resin-tooth tissues interface of a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive systems

  • Xuan Vinh Tran (Faculty of Odonto-stomatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (UMP)) ;
  • Khanh Quang Tran (Faculty of Odonto-stomatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (UMP))
  • 투고 : 2020.04.20
  • 심사 : 2021.01.12
  • 발행 : 2021.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study was conducted to compare the microleakage and characteristics of the resin-tooth tissue interface between self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems after 48 hours and 3 months. Materials and Methods: 40 extracted premolar teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups: 1-step self-etch adhesive system - OptibondTM All-In-One, and 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system - AdperTM Single Bond 2. Both groups were subjected to 500 thermocycles (5℃-55℃) before scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis or microleakage trial at 48-hour and 3-month time periods. Results: SEM images showed the hybrid layer thickness, diameter, and length of resin tags of the self-etch adhesive (0.42 ± 0.14 ㎛; 1.49 ± 0.45 ㎛; 16.35 ± 14.26 ㎛) were smaller than those of the etch-and-rinse adhesive (4.39 ± 1.52 ㎛; 3.49 ± 1 ㎛; 52.81 ± 35.81 ㎛). In dentin, the microleakage scores of the 2 adhesives were not different in both time periods (48 hours/3 months). However, the microleakage score of etch-and-rinse adhesive increased significantly after 3 months (0.8 ± 0.63 and 1.9 ± 0.88, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The self-etch adhesive exhibited better long-term sealing ability in dentin when compared to that of the etch-and-rinse adhesive. The greater hybrid layer thickness and dimensions of resin tags did not guarantee reliable, long-lasting sealing in the bonding area.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-853. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  2. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131 Supplement:20S-25S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0398
  3. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore's pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. A Status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology. J Adhes Dent 2020;22:7-34.
  4. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2017;8:1-17. https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001
  5. Sezinando A. Looking for the ideal adhesive - a review. Rev port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac 2014;55:194-206.
  6. Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres AP, Vermelho PM, Fronza BM, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Self-etch adhesive systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J 2015;26:3-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302442
  7. Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding to dentin: smear layer and the process of hybridization. In: Eliades G, Watts D, Eliades T, editors. Dental hard tissues and bonding. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p89-122.
  8. Talungchit S, Jessop JL, Cobb DS, Qian F, Geraldeli S, Pashley DH, Armstrong SR. Ethanol-wet bonding and chlorhexidine improve resin-dentin bond durability: quantitative analysis using raman spectroscopy. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:441-450.
  9. Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992;20:3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90002-T
  10. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, Chen JH, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles? J Dent 2015;43:525-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004
  11. Moura SK, Reis A, Pelizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Loguercio AD, Arana-Chavez VE, Grande RH. Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:315-325.
  12. Thanaratikul B, Santiwong B, Harnirattisai C. Self-etch or etch-and-rinse mode did not affect the microshear bond strength of a universal adhesive to primary dentin. Dent Mater J 2016;35:174-179. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-109
  13. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023
  14. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Shear bond strength and microleakage of new dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1993;6:295-298.
  15. Yap AU, Ho KS, Wong KM. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:666-671. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00296.x
  16. Schuldt C, Birlbauer S, Pitchika V, Crispin A, Hickel R, Kuhnisch J. Shear bond strength and microleakage of a self-etching adhesive for fissure sealing after different types of aging. Dent Mater J 2016;35:490-497. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-323
  17. Mohammad ZK, Luddin N, Masudi SM, Alam MK. Microleakage in class II composite restorations bonded with self-etch, one-step, one-component adhesive system: a CLSM study. Int Med J 1994;22:418-421.
  18. Mauro SJ, Durao VC, Briso AL, Sundefeld ML, Rahal V. Effect of different adhesive systems on microleakage in class II composite resin restorations. Int J Adhes Adhes 2012;34:6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.004
  19. Waldman GL, Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J. Microleakage and resin-to-dentin interface morphology of pre-etching versus self-etching adhesive systems. Open Dent J 2008;2:120-125. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210600802010120
  20. Armstrong S, Breschi L, Ozcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B. Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach. Dent Mater 2017;33:133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015
  21. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99.
  22. Gateva N, Kabaktchieva R. Hybrid layer thickness in primary and permanent teeth - a comparison between total etch adhesives. J IMAB 2012;18:191-199. https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2012182.191
  23. Pereira CN, Daleprane B, Barbosa PF, Moreira AN, de Magalhaes CS. Qualitative evaluation of scanning electron microscopy methods in a study of the resin cement/dentine adhesive interface. Microsc Microanal 2014;20:268-275.
  24. Patel MU, Punia SK, Bhat S, Singh G, Bhargava R, Goyal P, Oza S, Raiyani CM. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage of posterior teeth restored with amalgam, composite and zirconomer - a stereomicroscopic study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ZC65-ZC67.
  25. El Sayed HY, Abdalla AI, Shalby ME. Marginal microleakage of composite resin restorations bonded by desensitizing one step self etch adhesive. Tanta Dent J 2014;11:180-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2014.10.001
  26. Van Meerbeek B, Dhem A, Goret-Nicaise M, Braem M, Lambrechts P, VanHerle G. Comparative SEM and TEM examination of the ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. J Dent Res 1993;72:495-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720020501
  27. Wieczkowski G Jr, Yu XY, Davis EL, Joynt RB. Microleakage in various dentin bonding agent/composite resin systems. Oper Dent 1992;Supplement 5:62-67.
  28. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992;8:125-130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90067-M
  29. Vichi A, Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1497-1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6
  30. Tjaderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol IL, Geraldeli S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carrilho M, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Strategies to prevent hydrolytic degradation of the hybrid layer - a review. Dent Mater 2013;29:999-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.016
  31. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007;28:3757-3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044
  32. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Okihara T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of glycero-phosphate dimethacrylate (GPDM) with hydroxyapatite and dentin. Dent Mater 2018;34:1072-1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.04.003
  33. Kenshima S, Francci C, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Filho LE. Conditioning effect on dentin, resin tags and hybrid layer of different acidity self-etch adhesives applied to thick and thin smear layer. J Dent 2006;34:775-783.
  34. Dickens SH, Cho BH. Interpretation of bond failure through conversion and residual solvent measurements and Weibull analyses of flexural and microtensile bond strengths of bonding agents. Dent Mater 2005;21:354-364.
  35. Sundfeld RH, Valentino TA, de Alexandre RS, Briso AL, Sundefeld ML. Hybrid layer thickness and resin tag length of a self-etching adhesive bonded to sound dentin. J Dent 2005;33:675-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.011
  36. Alcantara-Galeana MdCZ, Contreras-Bulnes R, Rodriguez-Vilchis LE, Espinosa-Pesqueira ME, Barrera-Ortega CC, Lopez-Hurtado IM, Fernandez-Bobadilla A. Microhardness, structure, and morphology of primary enamel after phosphoric acid, self-etching adhesive, and Er:YAG laser etching. Int J Opt 2017;2017:7634739.
  37. Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, Pan Y, Cui Y, Xia W. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin. J Dent 2017;62:72-80.
  38. Spencer P, Wang Y. Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:447-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10364
  39. Goncalves L, Amaral CM, Poskus LT, Guimaraes JG, Silva EM. Degradation of resin composites in a simulated deep cavity. Braz Dent J 2014;25:532-537. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300089