References
- Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod 2008;34:1291-1301.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028
- Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J 2014;216:299-303. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.204
- Violich DR, Chandler NP. The smear layer in endodontics - a review. Int Endod J 2010;43:2-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01627.x
- Machado R, Garcia LD, da Silva Neto UX, Cruz Filho AM, Silva RG, Vansan LP. Evaluation of 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid in smear layer removal and tubular dentin sealer penetration. Microsc Res Tech 2018;81:275-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22976
- Shahravan A, Haghdoost AA, Adl A, Rahimi H, Shadifar F. Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2007;33:96-105.
- Mozo S, Llena C, Forner L. Review of ultrasonic irrigation in endodontics: increasing action of irrigating solutions. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e512-e516. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17621
- Weller RN, Brady JM, Bernier WE. Efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning. J Endod 1980;6:740-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(80)80185-3
- Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Silva-Sousa YT, Bruniera JF, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Ex vivo evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from the mesial root canal system of mandibular first molars. Int Endod J 2017;50:398-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12630
- Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Armellin E, Conte G, Cianconi L. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. J Endod 2013;39:1456-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028
- Schmidt TF, Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT, Pashley DH, Bortoluzzi EA. Effect of ultrasonic activation of irrigants on smear layer removal. J Endod 2015;41:1359-1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.023
- Saber SD, Hashem AA. Efficacy of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal. J Endod 2011;37:1272-1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.007
- De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, de Siqueira Zuolo A, Perez R, Carvalho MS, Souza EM, Lopes RT, Silva EJ. Micro-CT comparison of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation as final irrigation protocols on the removal of accumulated hard-tissue debris from oval shaped-canals. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:3087-3093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2729-y
- Kolli S, Balasubramanian SK, Kittappa K, Mahalaxmi S. Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher files in endodontics. Aust Endod J 2018;44:71-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12211
- Kato AS, Cunha RS, da Silveira Bueno CE, Pelegrine RA, Fontana CE, de Martin AS. Investigation of the efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating activation: an environmental scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2016;42:659-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.016
- Silva EJ, Carvalho CR, Belladonna FG, Prado MC, Lopes RT, De-Deus G, Moreira EJ. Micro-CT evaluation of different final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from isthmus-containing mesial root of mandibular molars. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:681-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2483-1
- Bueno CR, Cury MT, Vasques AM, Sarmiento JL, Trizzi JQ, Jacinto RC, Sivieri-Araujo G, Dezan Junior E. Cleaning effectiveness of a nickel-titanium ultrasonic tip in ultrasonically activated irrigation: a SEM study. Braz Oral Res 2019;33:e017.
- Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, Cho Y, Johnson WB, Bozhilov K, Kim J, Shabahang S. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod 2003;29:170-175. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200303000-00002
- Xin Y, Yang J, Song KY. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2019;37:48-52.
- Haupt F, Meinel M, Gunawardana A, Hulsmann M. Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation. Aust Endod J 2020;46:40-46.
- Ballal V, Rao S, Al-Haj Husain N, Ozcan M. Evaluation of smear layer removal using different irrigation methods in root canals. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2019;27:97-102.
- Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Dall'Asta L, Cianconi L. FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal using different irrigant activation methods (EndoActivator, EndoVac, PUI and LAI). An in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:993-999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2179-y
- Caron G, Nham K, Bronnec F, Machtou P. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals. J Endod 2010;36:1361-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037
- Singh N, Chandra A, Tikku AP, Verma P. A comparative evaluation of different irrigation activation systems on smear layer removal from root canal: an in-vitro scanning electron microscope study. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:159-163. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.128060
- Kuah HG, Lui JN, Tseng PS, Chen NN. The effect of EDTA with and without ultrasonics on removal of the smear layer. J Endod 2009;35:393-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.007
- Perez F, Rouqueyrol-Pourcel N. Effect of a low-concentration EDTA solution on root canal walls: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:383-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.07.007
- Mancini M, Armellin E, Casaglia A, Cerroni L, Cianconi L. A comparative study of smear layer removal and erosion in apical intraradicular dentine with three irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. J Endod 2009;35:900-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.052
- Shahriari S, Kasraei S, Roshanaei G, Karkeabadi H, Davanloo H. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite activated with laser in intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM study. J Lasers Med Sci 2017;8:36-41. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2017.07
- Machado R, Comparin D, Back ED, Garcia LD, Alberton LR. Residual smear layer after root canal instrumentation by using Niti, M-Wire and CM-Wire instruments: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. Eur J Dent 2018;12:403-409. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_259_17
- Susin L, Liu Y, Yoon JC, Parente JM, Loushine RJ, Ricucci D, Bryan T, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irrigant agitation techniques in a closed system. Int Endod J 2010;43:1077-1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01778.x
- Prado MC, Leal F, Simao RA, Gusman H, do Prado M. The use of auxiliary devices during irrigation to increase the cleaning ability of a chelating agent. Restor Dent Endod 2017;42:105-110. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.105
- Wu L, Mu Y, Deng X, Zhang S, Zhou D. Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60℃ 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal. J Endod 2012;38:381-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.013
- Goel S, Tewari S. Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:465-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.04.023
- Gulabivala K, Ng YL, Gilbertson M, Eames I. The fluid mechanics of root canal irrigation. Physiol Meas 2010;31:R49-R84. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/31/12/R01
- De-Deus G, Marins J, Silva EJ, Souza E, Belladonna FG, Reis C, Machado AS, Lopes RT, Versiani MA, Paciornik S, Neves AA. Accumulated hard tissue debris produced during reciprocating and rotary nickel-titanium canal preparation. J Endod 2015;41:676-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.028
- Marques AC, Aguiar BA, Frota LM, Guimaraes BM, Vivacqua-Gomes N, Vivan RR, Duarte MA, de Vasconcelos BC. Evaluation of influence of widening apical preparation of root canals on efficiency of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid agitation protocols: study by scanning electron microscopy. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19:1087-1094. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2386
- Simezo AP, da Silveira Bueno CE, Cunha RS, Pelegrine RA, Rocha DG, de Martin AS, Kato AS. Comparative analysis of dentinal erosion after passive ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating activation: an environmental scanning electron study. J Endod 2017;43:141-146.
- Kanaan CG, Pelegrine RA, da Silveira Bueno CE, Shimabuko DM, Valamatos Pinto NM, Kato AS. Can irrigant agitation lead to the formation of a smear layer? J Endod 2020;46:1120-1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.007