Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제46권1호
  • /
  • Pages.3.1-3.14
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Interface between calcium silicate cement and adhesive systems according to adhesive families and cement maturation

  • Nelly Pradelle-Plasse (Department of Conservative Dentistry - Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Paris) ;
  • Caroline Mocquot (Department of Conservative Dentistry - Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Paris) ;
  • Katherine Semennikova (Department of Conservative Dentistry - Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Paris) ;
  • Pierre Colon (Department of Conservative Dentistry - Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Paris) ;
  • Brigitte Grosgogeat (Multimaterials and Interfaces Laboratory (UMR 5615), Biomaterials Team)
  • 투고 : 2020.05.23
  • 심사 : 2020.06.29
  • 발행 : 2021.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the interface between a calcium silicate cement (CSC), Biodentine and dental adhesives in terms of sealing ability. Materials and Methods: Microleakage test: 160 standardized class II cavities were prepared on 80 extracted human molars. The cavities were filled with Biodentine and then divided into 2 experimental groups according to the time of restoration: composite resin obturation 15 minutes after Biodentine handling (D0); restoration after 7 days (D7). Each group was then divided into 8 subgroups (n = 5) according to the adhesive system used: etch-and-rinse adhesive (Prime & Bond); self-etch adhesive 2 steps (Optibond XTR and Clearfil SE Bond); self-etch adhesive 1 step (Xeno III, G-aenial Bond, and Clearfil Tri-S Bond); and universal used as etch-and-rinse or self-etch (ScotchBond Universal ER or SE). After thermocycling, the teeth were immersed in a silver nitrate solution, stained, longitudinally sectioned, and the Biodentine/adhesive percolation was quantified. Scanning electron microscopic observations: Biodentine/adhesive interfaces were observed. Results: A tendency towards less microleakage was observed when Biodentine was etched (2.47%) and when restorations were done without delay (D0: 4.31%, D7: 6.78%), but this was not significant. The adhesives containing 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate monomer showed the most stable results at both times studied. All Biodentine/adhesive interfaces were homogeneous and regular. Conclusions: The good sealing of the CSC/adhesive interface is not a function of the system adhesive family used or the cement maturation before restoration. Biodentine can be used as a dentine substitute.

키워드

과제정보

To Stephane Legoff (URB 2I, Montrouge, France) for his contribution for the scanning electron microscopic (SEM) observations.

참고문헌

  1. Bachoo IK, Seymour D, Brunton P. A biocompatible and bioactive replacement for dentine: Is this a reality? The properties and uses of a novel calcium-based cement. Br Dent J 2013;214:E5.
  2. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod 1995;21:349-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80967-2
  3. Schwartz RS, Mauger M, Clement DJ, Walker WA 3rd. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a new material for endodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:967-975. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0337
  4. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--part II: leakage and biocompatibility investigations. J Endod 2010;36:190-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.010
  5. Sarkar NK, Caicedo R, Ritwik P, Moiseyeva R, Kawashima I. Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2005;31:97-100. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000133155.04468.41
  6. Bozeman TB, Lemon RR, Eleazer PD. Elemental analysis of crystal precipitate from gray and white MTA. J Endod 2006;32:425-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.009
  7. Watson TF, Atmeh AR, Sajini S, Cook RJ, Festy F. Present and future of glass-ionomers and calcium-silicate cements as bioactive materials in dentistry: biophotonics-based interfacial analyses in health and disease. Dent Mater 2014;30:50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.202
  8. Atmeh AR, Chong EZ, Richard G, Festy F, Watson TF. Dentin-cement interfacial interaction: calcium silicates and polyalkenoates. J Dent Res 2012;91:454-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512443068
  9. Pradelle-Plasse N, Tran X, Colon P. Biocompatibility or cytotoxic effects of dental composites. Oxfordshire: Coxmoor Publishing Company; 2009.
  10. Villat C, Tran XV, Pradelle-Plasse N, Ponthiaux P, Wenger F, Grosgogeat B, Colon P. Impedance methodology: a new way to characterize the setting reaction of dental cements. Dent Mater 2010;26:1127-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.07.013
  11. Koubi G, Colon P, Franquin JC, Hartmann A, Richard G, Faure MO, Lambert G. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth - a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:243-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0701-9
  12. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00188.x
  13. Browne RM, Tobias RS. Microbial microleakage and pulpal inflammation: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:177-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00141.x
  14. Camilleri J. Investigation of Biodentine as dentine replacement material. J Dent 2013;41:600-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.003
  15. Meraji N, Camilleri J. Bonding over dentin replacement materials. J Endod 2017;43:1343-1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.025
  16. Hashem DF, Foxton R, Manoharan A, Watson TF, Banerjee A. The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration. Dent Mater 2014;30:343-349.
  17. Cengiz E, Ulusoy N. Microshear bond strength of tri-calcium silicate-based cements to different restorative materials. J Adhes Dent 2016;18:231-237.
  18. Colak H, Tokay U, Uzgur R, Uzgur Z, Ercan E, Hamidi MM. The effect of different adhesives and setting times on bond strength between Biodentine and composite. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2016;14:e217-e222.
  19. Odabas ME, Bani M, Tirali RE. Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to Biodentine. ScientificWorldJournal 2013;2013:626103.
  20. Abraham SB, Gaintantzopoulou MD, Eliades G. Cavity adaptation of water-based restoratives placed as liners under a resin composite. Int J Dent 2017;2017:5957107.
  21. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H, Ragini . Marginal adaptation evaluation of Biodentine and MTA plus in 'open sandwich' class II restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27:167-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12141
  22. Raskin A, Eschrich G, Dejou J, About I. In vitro microleakage of Biodentine as a dentin substitute compared to Fuji II LC in cervical lining restorations. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:535-542. PUBMED
  23. Besnault C, Attal JP. Simulated oral environment and microleakage of class II resin-based composite and sandwich restorations. Am J Dent 2003;16:186-190.
  24. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99.
  25. Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Spagnuolo G, Bramanti E, Laino L, Lauritano F, Cicciu M. Interface between MTA and dental bonding agents: scanning electron microscope evaluation. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2017;7:64-68. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_521_16
  26. Garrault S, Behr T, Nonat A. Formation of the C-S-H layer during early hydration of tricalcium silicate grains with different sizes. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:270-275. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0547212
  27. Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, Chieffi N, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite. Aust Dent J 2012;57:220-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01689.x
  28. Kayahan MB, Nekoofar MH, Kazandag M, Canpolat C, Malkondu O, Kaptan F, Dummer PM. Effect of acid-etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2009;42:1004-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01610.x
  29. Atabek D, Sillelioglu H, Olmez A. Bond strength of adhesive systems to mineral trioxide aggregate with different time intervals. J Endod 2012;38:1288-1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.004
  30. Silva e Souza MH Jr, Carneiro KG, Lobato MF, Silva e Souza PA, de Goes MF. Adhesive systems: important aspects related to their composition and clinical use. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:207-214. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300002
  31. Karaman E, Yazici AR, Aksoy B, Karabulut E, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems. Eur J Dent 2013;7:S060-S065. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119075
  32. Palma PJ, Marques JA, Falacho RI, Vinagre A, Santos JM, Ramos JC. Does delayed restoration improve shear bond strength of different restorative protocols to calcium silicate-based cements? Materials (Basel) 2018;11:2216.
  33. Sultana N, Nawal RR, Chaudhry S, Sivakumar M, Talwar S. Effect of acid etching on the micro-shear bond strength of resin composite-calcium silicate interface evaluated over different time intervals of bond aging. J Conserv Dent 2018;21:194-197. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_167_17
  34. Yoshioka M, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Nomura Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Van Meerbeek B. Adhesion/decalcification mechanisms of acid interactions with human hard tissues. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:56-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1216
  35. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-458.
  36. Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability-a systematic review. Materials (Basel) 2019;12:790.
  37. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Okihara T, De Munck J, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Minagi S, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Adhesive interfacial interaction affected by different carbon-chain monomers. Dent Mater 2013;29:888-897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.006
  38. Chatel E, Pradelle-Plasse N, Colon P, Grosgogeat B. Degradation mechanisms of modern self-etching adhesives. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1035.
  39. Koubi S, Elmerini H, Koubi G, Tassery H, Camps J. Quantitative evaluation by glucose diffusion of microleakage in aged calcium silicate-based open-sandwich restorations. Inter J Dent 2012;2012:105863.
  40. Aksel H, Kucukkaya Eren S, Askerbeyli Õrs S, Karaismailoglu E. Surface and vertical dimensional changes of mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine in different environmental conditions. J Appl Oral Sci 2018;27:e20180093.
  41. Agrafioti A, Tzimpoulas N, Chatzitheodoridis E, Kontakiotis EG. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability and microstructure of MTA and Biodentine after exposure to different environments. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1535-1540.