韓-歐FTA中与ILO相關條款紛爭及對中國的啓示

  • 투고 : 2021.11.08
  • 심사 : 2021.12.13
  • 발행 : 2021.12.30

초록

Over the past 20 years, labor standards have been widely used in free trade agreements. The U.S., the European Union and China have all aggressively signed free trade agreements with their trading partners, developing different styles on labor standards. According to the study, the implementation of the KOREa-EU FREE trade agreement has been hampered by ongoing disputes over the terms of the FREE trade agreement and the ILO since the korea-EU free trade agreement was signed. Because in order to break this deadlock, relevant scholars have done a lot of research, but mainly focused on the economic and trade field. Therefore, this paper for the first time systematically studies the substantive focus of disputes over FTA and ILO clauses, and carefully analyzes the domestic law amended by South Korea, and provides suggestions and inspirations for China by drawing lessons from the revision model of South Korea's domestic law. This is from a newperspective: the essence of the korea-EU FTA and ILO disputes is the conflict between international law and domestic law, and the conflict between free trade agreements and human rights protection. It holds that the essence of disputes should be sorted out from the perspective of legal principles and human rights protection, and the free trade and human rights protection should be actively coordinated. In order to make China more actively integrate into the international economy, China should adopt a positive attitude to revise and perfect its own laws, so as to realize the purpose of common development of international trade and human rights protection.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 동아대학교 학술연구비 지원에 의하여 연구되었음

참고문헌

  1. 김상만, <국제노동기구(ILO)의 핵심협약과 FTA협정상의 노동조항(노동장)에 대한 고찰>, 법학연구, 제17집 제2호, 2014.
  2. 김홍영, <결사의자유 협약, 강제 노동금지 협약비준의 쟁점과 과제>, 서울법학, 제27권 제2호, 2019. https://doi.org/10.15821/SLR.2019.27.2.008
  3. 김미영, 박종희, <미국의 노동기준 연계무역 정책과 한미FTA 노동조항의 전망>, 안암법학, 45권 , 2014.
  4. 박지순, 최홍기, , 안암법학, 61권, 2020.
  5. 조성혜, 공무원의 노동기본권에 관한 비교법적 고찰 - ILO협약과 독일.영국 법제와의 비교를 중심으로, 公法學硏究, 제19권 제4호, 2018.
  6. Agusti-Panareda, J, Ebert, F C, & LeClercq, D, , International Labour Office, 2014.
  7. Barbu M, Campling L, Smith A, et al, , Global Labour Journal, 2018.
  8. Cooper W H, ≪EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement and Its Implications for the United States≫, DIANE Publishing, 2011.
  9. Harrison, J Barbu, M Campling, L Richardson, B & Smith A, , JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 2019.
  10. 博登海默著, 邓正来译, ≪法理学, 法哲学及其方法≫, 中国政法大学出版社, 1999.
  11. 丁岩, 张文慧, <国际贸易体制中的劳工标准问题探究>, 产业与科技论坛, 第8期, 2013.
  12. 侯鲜明, <国际贸易中的劳工标准之争与对策分析>, 科学 经济 社会, 第4期, 2006
  13. 刘宏松, 杨柳青, <全球劳工治理: 主体, 现状与困境>, 上海交通大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 第1期, 2018.
  14. 张彬, <欧盟-韩国自贸协定对中国与双方间贸易的影响验证与分析>, 亚太经济, 第2期, 2017.
  15. 朱颖, 王玮, <解析欧盟韩国自由贸易协定>, 世界贸易组织动态与研究, 第1期, 2012.
  16. 李西霞, <自由贸易协定中劳工标准的发展态势>, 环球法律评论, 第1期, 2015.
  17. 程晓霞主编, ≪国际法≫, 中国人民大学出版社, 1999.
  18. 陈钰, 金俐, <国际劳工标准比较及影响因素分析>, 经济论坛, 第四期, 2019.
  19. 雷元亮, <浅析国际劳工标准与国际贸易的关系问题>, 大众商务:下半月, 第2期, 2010.
  20. 程卫东, <多元法律秩序与欧盟法治的局限性>, 欧洲研究, 第1期, 2016.
  21. 吴汉东, <知识产权法价值的中国语境解读>, 中国法学, 第2期, 2013