Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue (한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제)

Korean Psychological Association of Culture and Social Issues (한국문화및사회문제심리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Latent Classes and Influencing Factors According to the Love Types of Korean Adults

한국 성인의 사랑유형 잠재집단 및 영향요인 분석

  • 하문선 (공주교육대학교 교육대학원) ;
  • 송연주 (동의대학교 평생교육.청소년상담학과)
  • Received : 2021.09.28
  • Accepted : 2021.11.20
  • Published : 2021.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to classify 601 Korean adults into latent classes according to their love types and identify the differences in depression and find variables that affect the latent classes classification. As a result of the latent class analysis, the latent group for love types of Korean adults were classified into the L-H (7.7%) group, which showed the highest level of all three factors of intimacy, passion, and commitment, and the L-MH (33.6%) group, which all three factors were higher than the average, the L-M (39.8%) group with the mean of all three factors, the L-ML (14.6%) group with all three factors lower than the mean, and the L-L (4.3%) group with the lowest all three factors. Also, as a result of ANOVA, the L-MH group was psychologically healthier and more adaptive than the L-ML group. As a result of multinomial logistic analysis, females were more likely to belong to L-M, L-ML and L-L groups than males. In addition, singles were more likely to belong to the L-M and L-ML groups than those who were married. Also, the higher the anxiety attachment level, the higher the likelihood of belonging to the L-M, L-ML, and L-L groups than the L-H and L-MH groups, the L-ML and L-L groups than the L-M groups, and the L-L group rather than the L-ML groups. However, age, neuroticism, and emotional regulation did not affect the classification of latent classes. This study is meaningful in that it identified the various latent classes for the love types of Korean adults more three-dimensionally and suggested the possibility of differential interventions according to the characteristics of each group.

본 연구는 한국 성인 601명을 대상으로 이들의 사랑유형에 따른 잠재집단을 분류하고, 각 집단별 우울 수준의 차이 및 잠재집단 구분에 영향을 주는 변인(성차, 연령, 결혼여부, 신경증, 불안애착, 정서조절)을 파악하고자 수행되었다. 잠재집단분석(LCA)을 실시한 결과, 한국성인의 사랑유형의 잠재집단은 친밀감, 열정, 책임감의 세 요인 모두에 대해 가장 높은 수준을 보이는 L-H(7.7%)집단, 세 요인 모두 평균보다 높은 수준을 나타내는 L-MH(33.6%)집단, 세 요인 모두 평균 수준을 나타내는 L-M(39.8%)집단, 세 요인 모두 평균보다 낮은 수준을 보이는 L-ML(14.6%)집단, 세 요인 모두가 가장 낮은 수준을 보이는 L-L(4.3%)집단으로 분류됨을 확인하였다. 또한, 한국 성인의 사랑유형 각 잠재집단에 따라 우울 수준에 차이가 있는지 ANOVA 검증 결과, L-MH집단이 L-ML집단에 비해 심리적으로 보다 건강하고 적응적인 집단으로 나타났다. 다항로지스틱 분석 결과, 여성은 남성에 비해 L-M, L-ML 및 L-L집단에 속할 가능성이 높았고, 미혼은 기혼에 비해 L-M, L-ML집단에 속할 가능성이 높았다. 또한, 불안애착 수준이 높을수록 L-H, L-MH집단보다 L-M, L-ML, L-L집단에, L-M집단보다 L-ML와 L-L집단에, L-ML집단보다 L-L집단에 속할 가능성이 높았으나, 연령과 신경증, 정서조절은 잠재집단 구분에 영향을 미치지 않았다. 본 연구는 한국 성인의 사랑유형에 대한 다양한 하위 잠재집단을 보다 입체적으로 파악하여 집단별 특성에 따른 차별적 개입의 가능성을 제시했다는 점에서 의미가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 권석만 (2018). 젊은이를 위한 인간관계의 심리학(3판). 학지사.
  2. 권순달 (2004). 사랑의 이론과 측정도구의 생태학적 평가. 교육문제연구, 21, 165-184.
  3. 권순달 (2006). '사랑'의 요인 구조 분석과 평가. 교육평가연구, 19(2), 261-280.
  4. 권희경, 장재홍, 권영민 (2005). 애정관계 행동척도의 개발과 타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 10(4), 497-524.
  5. 김성현 (2004). 친밀 관계 경험검사 개정판 타당화 연구: 확증적 요인분석과 문항반응을 중심으로. 서울대학교 석사학위논문
  6. 김영수, 박재우 (2021). 중년기 기혼자의 사랑의 유형에 따른 결혼만족도와 의사소통의 차이. 한국심리치료학회지, 13(1), 1-23.
  7. 김종일 (2013). 사랑척도 연구의 동향과 과제. 한국동서정신과학회지, 16(1), 51-64.
  8. 김지현, 김복환, 하문선 (2011). 간편형 한국어 BFI(Big five inventory) 타당화 연구. 인간이해, 32(1). 47-65.
  9. 노유진, 박정윤, 김양희 (2006). 성인 애착유형과 미혼남녀의 사랑유형 및 이성교제의 관계. 대한가정학회지, 44(12), 31-42.
  10. 민경환, 김지현, 윤석빈, 장승민 (2000). 부정적 정서 조절 방략에 관한 연구: 정서 종류와 개인 변인에 따른 정서조절 양식의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 14(2), 1-16.
  11. 백욱현 (2010). 고등학교 청소년의 데이트폭력의 경험과 데이트관계의 지각. 청소년학연구, 17(1), 1-32.
  12. 서 준 (2011. 10. 01.). <충격세태> '불륜공화국' 대한민국 '불륜 트랜드' 실태. 일요시사. https://www.ilyosisa.co.kr/mobile/article.html?no=14833
  13. 송연주, 하문선 (2020). 한국 단축형 사랑중독척도(Korean-Love Addiction Questionnaire-Short Form: K-LAQ-SF) 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 26(4), 501-524.
  14. 송연주, 하문선 (2021). 대학생의 신경증과 우울 간 관계에서 정서조절과 관계중독의 매개효과. 청소년학연구, 28(2), 1-29.
  15. 양서연 (2011). 사랑에 대한 환상, 자존감, 자아분화 및 인지적 정서조절전략과 이성 관계집착 행동의 관계. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  16. 이지원, 이기학 (2014). 불안정애착 및 심리적 고통이 관계중독에 미치는 영향: 지지추구적 정서조절양식의 조절된 매개효과 검증. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 26(1), 65-95.
  17. 전겸구, 이민규 (1992). 한국판 CES-D 개발연구. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 11(1), 65-76.
  18. 정민아 (2004). 청소년기의 이성간 사랑 유형 분석-Sternberg의 사랑의 삼각이론을 중심으로. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문.
  19. 정태연, 최상진, 강진경 (2000). 성인기 애착특성과 낭만적 사랑 및 성격특성과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 5(2), 85-102.
  20. 채지은, 박정윤 (2021). 초기 성인기의 자기은폐, 기본심리욕구 충족이 이성관계 헌신에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 27(3), 305-323.
  21. 최혜경, 강진경, 신수진 (1999). Sternberg의 사랑의 삼각이론의 한국 부부에의 적용. 한국가정관리학회지, 17(4), 47-59.
  22. 하문선(2018). 아동기 부정적 정서성과 문제행동의 종단적 변화에 따른 잠재계층 전이양상과 영향요인. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(22), 699-725.
  23. 한송이, 홍혜영 (2010). 미혼남녀의 사랑유형과 자아존중감, 관계만족도, 신뢰도 연구. 통합치료연구, 2(1), 25-48.
  24. Acevedo, B. P., & Aron, A. (2009). Does a long-term relationship kill romantic love? Review of General Psychology, 13, 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014226
  25. Acker, M., & Davis, M. H. (1992). Intimacy, Passion and Commitment in Adult Romantic Relationships: A Test of the Triangular Theory of Love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(1), 21-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407592091002
  26. Ahmetoglu, G., Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The relationship between dimensions of love, personality, and relationship length. Arch. Sex. Behav, 39, 1181-1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9515-5
  27. Akaike, H. (1974). A New look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
  28. Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_3
  29. Beall, A. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). The social construction of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 417-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407595123006
  30. Brennan, K. A., Clark C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 434-465). New York: Guilford.
  31. Cohen, A. (2003). Numerical Analysis of Wavelet Methods. Elsevier, New York.
  32. Davies, M. F. (1996). EPQ correlates of love styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 257-259 https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00188-3
  33. Davila, J., Karney, B. R., Hall, T. W., & Bradbury, T. N. (2003). Depressive symptoms and marital satisfaction: Within-subject associations and the moderating effects of gender and neuroticism. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.17.4.557
  34. Engel, G., Olson, K. R., & Patrick, C. (2002). The personality of love: Fundamental motives and traits related to components of love. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 839-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00090-3
  35. Flores, P. J. (2010). 애착장애로서의 중독 [Addiction as an attachment disorder].(김갑중, 박춘삼 역). 서울: NUN(원전은 2004년 출판).
  36. Fraley, R. C. Waller, N. F. & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350-365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
  37. Frankl. V. E. (2007). 죽음의 수용소에서[Man's Search for Meaning].(이시형 역). 경기: 청아출판사(원전은 2005년에 출판).
  38. Freud, S. (1922). Certain neurotic mechanisms in jealousy, paranoia, and homosexuality. In Collected Papers (Vol. 2, pp. 235-240, 323). London: Hogarth.
  39. Furman, W., & Wehner, E. A. (1997). Adolescent romantic relationships: A developmental perspective. In S. Shulman & W. A. Collins (Eds.), Romantic relationships in adolescence: Developmental perspectives (pp. 21-36). JosseyBass/Wiley.
  40. Gao, G. (2001). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in Chinese and US American romantic relationships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25(3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(01)00007-4
  41. Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual differences, 30(8), 1311-1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6
  42. Hatfield, E. (1984). The dangers of intimacy. In V. Derlaga (Ed.), Communication, intimacy, and close relationships (pp. 207-220). New York: Academic Press.
  43. Hatfield, E. (1988). Passionate and companionate love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes(Eds), The psychology of love (pp. 191-217). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  44. Heaven, P. C. L., Smith, L., Prabhakar, S. M., Abraham, J., & Mete, M. E. (2006). Personality and conflict communication patterns in cohabiting couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 829-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.012
  45. Hill, K. G., White, H. R., Chung, I. J., Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2000). Early adult outcomes of adolescent binge drinking: person and variable centered analyses of binge drinking trajectories. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 892-901 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02071.x
  46. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and Theoretical Perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford.
  47. Kreuter, F., Yan, T., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Examining the effectiveness of latent class analysis to item evaluation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A), 171(3), 723-738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00530.x
  48. Lee, J. A. (1973). Colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. New Press.
  49. Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional analysis of intimacy, passion, and commitment: testing the assumptions of the Triangular Theory of Love. Psychol. Rep. 90, 1009-1014. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.90.3.1009-1014
  50. Lester, D & Philbrick, J. (1988). Correlates of love. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 689-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(88)90168-7
  51. Levy, M. B., & Davis, K. E. (1988). Love styles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5(4), 439-471 https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407588054004
  52. Madey, S. F., & Rodgers, L. (2009). The effect of attachment and Sternberg's Triangular Theory of Love on relationship satisfaction. Individual Differences Research, 7, 76-84.
  53. Marshall, T. C. (2008). Cultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(1), 143-168 https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507086810
  54. Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
  55. McCrae, J. S., Chapman, M. V., & Christ, S. L. (2006). Profile of children investigated for sexual abuse: association with psychopathology symptoms and services. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(4), 468-481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.76.4.468
  56. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). "Life course persistent" and "adolescence limited" antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
  57. Muthen, B. O. & Muthen, L. K. (2000). "Intergrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes." Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882-891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x
  58. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
  59. Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D. & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44(2), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.329
  60. Purnamaningsih, E. H. (2017). Personality and emotion regulation strategies. International Journal of Psychology Research, 10(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.2040
  61. Radoloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
  62. Schindler, I., Fagundes, P. C., & Murdock W. K. (2010). Predictors of romantic relationship formation: Attachment style, prior relationships, and dating goals. Personal Relationships, 17(1), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01255.x
  63. Schroder, J., & Schmiedeberg, C. (2015). Effects of relationship duration, cohabitation, and marriage on the frequency of intercourse in couples: findings from German panel data. Soc. Sci. Res. 52, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.01.009
  64. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimation Dimensions of a Model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464 https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
  65. Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360
  66. Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., Karwowski, M., Groyecka, A., Aavik, T., Akello, G. ... & Sternberg. R. (2020). University of the triangular theory of love: adaptation and psychometric properities of the triangular love scale in 25 countries. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(1), 106-115.
  67. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.93.2.119
  68. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triangle of love: Intimacy, passion, commitment. Basic Books (AZ).
  69. Sternberg, R. J. (1990). A triangular theory of love scale. Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Manuscript.
  70. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199705)27:3<313::AID-EJSP824>3.0.CO;2-4
  71. Sternberg, R. J., & Grajek, S. (1984). The nature of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(2), 312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.2.312
  72. Sumter, S. R., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). Perceptions of love across the lifespan: Differences in passion, intimacy, and commitment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(5), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025413492486
  73. Wan, W. N., Luk, C. L. & Lai, C. L. (2000). Personality correlates of loving styles among Chinese students in Hong Kong. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 169-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00185-3
  74. Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self-and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality, 68, 413-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00102
  75. Woll, S. B. (1989). Personality and relationship correlates of loving styles. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 480-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(89)90016-0