DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rate of Waste in Authority Names for the Web of Science Journals among Saudi Universities

  • Received : 2021.07.05
  • Published : 2021.07.30

Abstract

The current study aimed at measuring the rate of loss in search results of the actual number of publications in journals indexed by Web of Science when not using the accurate official authority name as indicated by the Ministry of Education. Conducting a search using the authority name does not always yield complete results of all existing publications. Researchers in Saudi universities tend to use up to 10 different random names of universities when searching. This interesting fact has prompted the authors of this paper to conduct a study on the search results of 30 Saudi universities using the authority name as indicated by the Ministry of Education. The statistical analyses revealed that there is a high tendency for the wrong use of authority names. Results show that 8 universities were not found in the search results. Furthermore, other universities are losing between 10 and 30% of search results that reflect the actual number of publications. Consequently, the rank of each university, as well as the general rank of Saudi universities in the Web of Science, will be affected.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdoulaye, K. (2002). Perceptions of Cataloguers and End-Users towards Bilingual Authority Files. Electronic Library, 20(3),202. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470210432348
  2. Bergman, E. (2012). Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using "Web of Science," "Scopus," or "Google Scholar". Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(6),370-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002
  3. George, M. (2008). The Elements of Library Research: What Every Student Needs to Know. Princeton University Press. ISBN-978-0-6911-3857-2
  4. Light, M. (2007). Moving beyond the Name: Defining Corporate Entities to Support Provenance-Based Access. Journal of Archival Organization, 5(1-2),49-74. https://doi.org/10.1300/J201v05n01_04
  5. Moulaison, H.; Stanley, S. (2013). Beyond Failure: Potentially Mitigating Failed Author Searches in the Online Library Catalog through the Use of Linked Data. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(1),37-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2013.738562
  6. Pawade, D. (2019). The Case Study on the Effectiveness of Online Learning Management System to Impart the Knowledge of Advance Course. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4),40-47.
  7. Simkins, M. (2005). Web Research: Ten Tips for the Techno-Challenged. Technology & Learning, 25(11),38.
  8. Smith-Yoshimura, K. [et. Al] (2104). Registering Researchers in Authority Files. OCLC Online Computer Library Center. ISBN: 978-1-55653-487-4.
  9. Tomaszewski, R. (2016). The Concept of the "Imploded Boolean Search": A Case Study with Undergraduate Chemistry Students. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(3), p527-533. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00255
  10. Weber, H., Becker, D., Hillmert, S. (2019). Information-Seeking Behavior and Academic Success in Higher Education: Which Search Strategies Matter for Grade Differences among University Students and How Does This Relevance Differ by Field of Study?, Higher Education. The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 77(4),657-678.
  11. Zhou, M. (2013). A Systematic Understanding of Successful Web Searches in Information-Based Tasks. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1),321-331.