International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security (국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Integrated Model of the Higher Education Financing Under the Quadruple Helix Concept

  • Received : 2021.07.05
  • Published : 2021.07.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Rapid growth of the higher education role in ensuring the socio-economic and innovative development of the national economy in the context of the development of the information society and the knowledge economy is observed. Achieving positive synergistic effects of the higher education development requires proper funding for university education and research. The existing funding models for national higher education systems in a number of developing countries need modernization in accordance with the modern challenges of economic and innovative development. The purpose of the article is to formulate theoretical - methodological and applied foundations for the development and implementation of the integrated model of the higher education financing under the Quadruple Helix concept. At the center of the developed model are the areas of interaction identified by the authors, namely: Personnel, Science, Management, Innovation, Social area. This made it possible to specify the interests of all stakeholders and orient the activities of higher education institutions to the satisfaction of these interests. Effective implementation of the integrated Model of the higher education financing requires increasing the level of investment attractiveness and practical value of university research; activation of innovative development of enterprises; state stimulation of business participation in university research and education; harmonization of current legislation with EU standards. Implementation of the Model will diversify sources of funding for universities, increase their level of economic security and achieve integrated synergies from the interaction of universities, business, government and the public (as the main stakeholders within the Quadruple Helix concept).

Keywords

References

  1. Arnkil, R., Jarvensivu, A., Koski P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring Quadruple Helix Outlining user-oriented innovation models, Final Report on Quadruple Helix Research for the CLIQ project, under the Interreg IVC Programme. URL: https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/65758/978-951-44-8209-0.pdf
  2. Butko, M., Popelo, O., & Pishenin, I. (2019). Innovations in Human Resources Management in Eurointegration Conditions: Case for Ukrainian Agro-industrial Complex. Marketing and management of innovations, 2, 74-82. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.2-07
  3. Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G., (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production 1 in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. Springer Briefs in Business, 7, 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0
  4. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
  5. Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, 10 (1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.31.42
  6. Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. J Innov Entrep, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
  7. Colapinto, C., & Porlezza, C. (2012). Innovation in creative industries: from the quadruple helix model to the systems theory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(4), 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0051-x
  8. Cosmulese, C. G., Grosu, V., Hlaciuc, E., & Zhavoronok, A. (2019). The Influences of the Digital Revolution on the Educational System of the EU Countries. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 242-254. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.3-18
  9. Degtyarova, I., Hryhorash, O., & Chentsov V. (2018). The mechanism of higher education funding in Ukraine: nationwide and local perspective. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(3), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(3).2018.19
  10. Djakona, A., Kholiavko, N., Dubyna, M., Zhavoronok, A., & Lavrov, R. (2020). The higher education adaptability to the digital economy. Bulletin of the National Academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 4(386), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518-1467.130
  11. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple Helix Innovation: Industry, University, and Government in Action, London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00357.x
  12. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  13. Etzkowitz, H., & Dizisah, J. (2008). Triple Helix Circulation: the heart of innovation and development. International Journal of Tecnology Management and Sustainable Development, 7(3), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.7.2.101_1
  14. European Commission Database (2020). URL: https://ec.europa.eu
  15. Grosu, V., Kholiavko, N., Safonov, Yu., Zhavoronok, A., & Cosmulese, C.G. (2021). Quintuple Helix Model: Investment Aspects of Higher Education Impact on Sustainability. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 43(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2021.10
  16. Kalenyuk, I., Grishnova, O., Tsymbal, L., Djakona, A., & Panchenko, E. (2020). Formation of intellectual corporate capital: methods and moderntrends. Bulletin the National academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 1(383), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518-1467.23
  17. Kalenyuk, I., Tsymbal, L., Djakon, A., & Panchenko, E. (2018). Assessment of intellectual leadership under global competition. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(4), 212-223. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(4).2018.18
  18. Kholiavko, N. I. (2019). Diversification of Financing Sources of Heis in Ukraine. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 3(30), 510-516. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v3i30.179829
  19. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix,..., and an N-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analysing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
  20. Marhasova, V., Garafonova, O., Sakun, O., Fedorenko, A., & Yankovoi, R. (2020). Financial Instruments of Stimulation of Investment Activity: Foreign Aspect. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 4(35), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i35.221841
  21. Oscar, A., Monterino, S., & Thomshon, M. (2010). A Growth Model for the Quadruple Helix Innovation Theory. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(4), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.626438
  22. Polishchuk, Y., Kornyliuk, A., & Britchenko, I. (2019). University as a core of e-learning ecosystem. E-learning: Unlocking the Gate to Education around the Globe 14th conference reader, Prague: Center for Higher Education Studies Location: Microsoft, Prague, Czech Republic Date: JUN 20-21, 309-319.
  23. Popelo, O., Kychko, I., Tulchynska, S., Zhygalkevych, Zh., Treitiak, O. (2021). The Impact of Digitalization on the Forms Change of Employment and the Labor Market in the Context of the Information Economy Development. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(5), 160-167. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.5.23
  24. Popelo, O. V. (2017). Methodological approaches to modernization processes of the productive forces in the conditions of Eurointegration. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 1(1(9)), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.25140/2410-9576-2017-1-1(9)-218-224
  25. Shkarlet, S. M., Gonta, O. I., & Dubyna, M. V. (2016). Peculiarities of system approach use to cognition of economic phenomena. Scientific bulletin of Polissia, 4(8), 9- 17.
  26. Shkarlet, S., Kholiavko, N., & Dubyna, M. (2019). Information Economy: Management of Educational, Innovation, and Research Determinants. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 126-141. https://doi.org/10.21272/MMI.2019.3-10
  27. Shkoda, T., Tepliuk, M., & Sahaidak, M. (2020). Intellectual Potential Management in Forming Strategic Partnership of Science-Business-Education. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(5), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-5-221-232
  28. Woo, P. H. (2014). Transition from the Triple Helix to N-Tuple Helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell. Scientometrics, 99, 203-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1124-3
  29. Woznicki, J. (2013). Financing and Deregulation in Higher Education. Warsaw: Institute of Knowledge Society. URL: http://pbc.biaman.pl/Content/27641/Financing_wersja_ostat.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 20
  30. Yawson, R. M. (2009). The Ecological System of Innovation: A New Architectural Framework for a Functional Evidence-Based Platform for Science and Innovation Policy, The Future of Innovation Proceedings of the XXIV ISPIM 2009 Conference. Vienna, Austria. June 21-24. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.7367138.v1