DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Esophagectomy

  • Park, Seong Yong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2021.04.26
  • Accepted : 2021.07.02
  • Published : 2021.08.05

Abstract

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer can be performed in multiple positions, such as the lateral decubitus position or prone position, using various techniques. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages, and surgeons can select an appropriate approach based on their preferences. Except for the reduction of pulmonary complications, the benefits of thoracoscopic esophagectomy, including oncologic outcomes, have not been proven scientifically. This review describes the approaches and procedures of thoracoscopic esophagectomy and presents scientific evidence for this procedure.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank Nayun Lee for drawing the figures (Figs. 1, 2) in this manuscript.

References

  1. Booka E, Takeuchi H, Nishi T, et al. The impact of postoperative complications on survivals after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1369. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001369
  2. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg 2014;260:259-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000644
  3. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992; 37:7-11.
  4. DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, de Paula RA, Grecco E. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995;5:1-5.
  5. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003; 238:486-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000089858.40725.68
  6. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position: experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.03.016
  7. Seesing MF, Goense L, Ruurda JP, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van Hillegersberg R. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis of semiprone versus prone position. Surg Endosc 2018;32:2758-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5975-1
  8. Orringer MB, Sloan H. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978;76:643-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(19)41012-X
  9. Mori K, Yamagata Y, Aikou S, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery. Dis Esophagus 2016;29:429-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12345
  10. Hsu PK, Huang CS, Wu YC, Chou TY, Hsu WH. Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg 2014;38:402-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2265-5
  11. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 2003;90:108-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4022
  12. Daiko H, Nishimura M. A pilot study of the technical and oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection in the prone position for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2012;26:673-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1934-4
  13. Tapias LF, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, et al. Outcomes with open and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:1097-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.062
  14. Miyasaka D, Okushiba S, Sasaki T, et al. Clinical evaluation of the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg 2013;6:26-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5910.2012.00158.x
  15. Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Kitagawa Y. Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;61:513-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0258-9
  16. Seesing MF, Gisbertz SS, Goense L, et al. A propensity score matched analysis of open versus minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2017;266:839-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002393
  17. Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg 2012;255:197-203. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823e39fa
  18. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Ozawa S, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a nationwide database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:1821-7. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5808-4
  19. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:1887-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9