DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the VPBL Model for SW Liberal Education

SW 교양 교육을 위한 VPBL 모델에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Si-Jung (Division of Liberal Arts, Cheongju University)
  • Received : 2021.05.24
  • Accepted : 2021.07.20
  • Published : 2021.07.28

Abstract

This paper studies VPBL(Various PBL) models, applies them to classes, and analyzes results so that students of various majors can design and implement problems according to the characteristics of their majors in order to improve problem solving in education. VPBL performs the process of designing and implementing problems that reflect the characteristics of the major by applying constraints to the professor's programming language. The professor performs mini_class in the process of solving the designed problem and then shares it throughout. VPBL model apply results, The traditional teaching method was 3.51 points and the application of the VPBL model was 4.52 points, and "interaction, understanding of learning contents, and acquiring knowledge related to curriculum" were improved. In addition, VPBL has the advantage of expanding the learning range in the solving process as it is based on various problem solving, which has the effect of expanding the learning range compared to existing class models. Research on the expanded application of various SW liberal education in the future is required.

교양 SW교육은 전공 SW교육과는 다르게 다양한 전공의 학생들이 동일학습과정에 참여하므로 교수자가 문제 설계에 어려움이 많다. 본 논문은 교육의 문제 해결 향상을 위하여 PBL로 수업 운영에 있어 다양한 전공의 학생들에게 전공의 특성에 맞게 문제를 설계 구현할 수 있도록 VPBL(Various Problem-based Learning) 모델을 연구하고 수업에 적용 및 결과를 분석하였다. VPBL은 프로그래밍 언어에 대한 제약조건을 교수자가 제시하고 학습자는 제약조건을 적용하여 전공의 특성을 반영한 문제를 설계 운영한다. 교수자는 설계된 문제를 해결하는 과정에서 mini_class를 실시한 후 전체에 공유한다. VPBL 모델 적용 결과 전통적인 수업 방식의 비교 분석결과 전통적 교수법은 3.34점 VPBL 모델 적용은 4.42점으로 "상호작용, 학습 내용 이해, 교과 관련 지식 습득" 등이 향상된 것으로 나타났다. VPBL의 경우 다양한 문제 해결을 기반으로 하고 있어 해결 과정에서 학습 범위를 확장하는 장점을 보였다. 향후 다양한 SW 교양 교과에 확대 적용 및 활용에 대한 연구가 요구된다.

Keywords

References

  1. W. S. Sohn. (2017). A Developing a Teaching-Learning Model of Software Education for Non-major Undergraduate Students. Korean institute for practical engineering education, 9(2), 107-117. DOI : 10.14702/JPEE.2017.107
  2. K. K. Kim, D. H. Koo & S. K. Han. (2020). Development a Standard Curriculum Model of Next-generation Software Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 24(4), 337-367. DOI : 10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.4.337
  3. W. S. Kim. (2019). Exploring the direction of granular basic-software education considering the major of college students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 23(4), 329-341. DOI : 10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.4.329
  4. J. Y. Seo. (2019). A Case Study on the Teaching and Learning Method of SW Education for Data Analysis Problem Solving. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 20(10), 1953-1960, DOI : 10.9728/dcs.2019.20.10.1953
  5. J. Y. Seo. (2018) A Study on Non-Majors Students' Perception of the SW Liberal Education in University. Journal of digital convergence, (16)5, 21- 31. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.5.021
  6. S.J. Kim. & D. E. Cho. (2018). A Stduy on Learning Model for Effective Coding Education. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, (9)2, 7-12 DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.2.007
  7. E. H. Roh, (2020). A Study on Non-Majors Student's Perception of SW Education and Contents of SW Liberal Education, Journal of Digital Contents Society, (21)7, 1241-1250 DOI : 10.9728/dcs.2020.21.7.1241
  8. M. J. Lee. (2017). Exploring the Effect of SW Programming Curriculum and Content Development Model for Non-majors College Students : focusing on Visual Representation of SW Solutions, Journal of Digital Contents Society, (18)7, 1313-1321 DOI : 10.9728/dcs.2017.18.7.1313
  9. K. H. Joo. (2015). Study of e-PBL Teaching and Learning Model for Efficient Flipped Learning. The Society of Convergence Knowledge, 3(1), 47-53. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE06140473
  10. V. Barr & C. Stephenson, (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?," ACM Inroads, (2)1, 48-54. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1929887.1929905
  11. K. Brennan & M. Resnick, (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking, Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver,Canada, 1-25.
  12. W. S. Kim. (2019). Analyzing the trend of college students perception of software liberal arts subjects. Korea Journal og General Education. (13)4, 161-180,
  13. W. H. Gijselaers & H. G. Schmidt. (1990). Development and Evaluation of a Causal Model of Problem-Based Learning. Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/2776
  14. J. E. Nah, (2017). Software Education Needs Analysis in Liberal Arts, Korean Journal of General Education, (11)3, 63-89.
  15. I. M. Kim, H. J. Kang, S. M. Yoo, H. K. Hong & E. H. Roh (2019). The first step to coding to solve problems, Learning ground, pp.5-7.