디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권7호
  • /
  • Pages.189-197
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

외부기술이전 기업의 기술이전·사업화 전문기관의 활용이 기업의 기술성과 및 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 -기술이전·사업화 전문기관의 복합활용을 중심으로-

A Study on the Influence of the Use of Specialized Organizations for Technology Transfer and Commercialization on Corporate Performance -Focusing on the complex use of specialized institutions-

  • Lee, Jungsoo (Korea Institute of Robotics & Technology Convergence) ;
  • Park, Myeongjun (Korea Institute of Robotics & Technology Convergence) ;
  • Jee, Sungchul (Korea Institute of Robotics & Technology Convergence) ;
  • Park, Minjeong (Korea Institute of Robotics & Technology Convergence) ;
  • Sohn, Dongseop (Korea Institute of Robotics & Technology Convergence)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.02
  • 심사 : 2021.07.20
  • 발행 : 2021.07.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

우리나라는 기술사업화 활성화를 위하여 기술이전·사업화 전문기관을 지속적으로 육성하고 있으며 다양한 형태로 구성되고 있다. 하지만 이러한 전문기관의 유형과 지원형태에 따른 성과에 대한 연구가 제한적으로 이루어지고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 기술이전·사업화 전문기관의 유형을 구분하여 복합활용성과와 기술을 수용한 기업의 성과를 측정하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 기업 외부기술 도입 및 활용을 추진한 380개기업을 대상으로 OLS 및 NBR 회귀분석 방법을 활용하여 가설검증을 실시하였다. 분석결과 기술이전·사업화 전문기관을 복합 활용 할수록 기업성과에 긍정적인 영향을 주고, 외부기술도입의 항목에 따라 기업성과에 상이한 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 산업성장단계가 초기일수록 산업이 안정화되는 영역의 기업성과가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이를 통해 기업차원에서 기술이전·사업화 전문기관의 활용과 기업의 외부기술을 도입전략 시사점을 제시하였다.

In order to commercialize technology, Korea is continuously fostering specialized institutions for technology transfer/commercialization, and it is composed in various forms. However, there are limited studies on corporate performance according to the type of technology transfer/commercialization specialized institution and the type of support. This study aims to measure the combined utilization performance and performance of companies that have adopted the technology by classifying the types of technology transfer/commercialization specialized institutions. To this end, a study was conducted on 380 companies that promoted the introduction and use of external technologies. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the more the combined use of technology transfer/commercialization specialized institutions has a positive effect on corporate performance, and has different effects on corporate performance depending on the items of external technology introduction. In addition, it was found that the earlier the industrial growth stage is, the higher the corporate performance. Through this study, implications of strategies for the use of specialized organizations for technology transfer and commercialization and introduction of external technologies of the company were presented at the corporate level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  2. E. M. Rogers. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations, NewYork : Simon and Schuster.
  3. B. J. Kang & D. S. Oh. (1999). A Research on the Establishment of Technomart for Active Technology Transfer. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 2(3), 46-93.
  4. S. Liyanage & H. Mitchell. (1994). Strategic management of interactions at the academic-industry interface. Technovation, 14(10), 641-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(94)90111-2
  5. W. S. Park & S. J. Yung. (2000). Analysis of Success Factors of Technology Transfer between R & D Centers and Companies in the Electronic Components Industry. Journal of Technology Innovation, 8(2), 119-143.
  6. S. K. Lee., S. J. Ahn & K. Y. Lee. (2005). A Study on Technology Transfer Performances and Its Determinants of Technology Licensing Organization. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, 17(3), 31-50
  7. K. H. Kim & D. S. Oh. 2006. Effects of Institutional Environments and Strategic Resources of University TLOs on Technology Commercialization. Advancing Small Enterprise Innovation Research, 9(1), 87-109
  8. B. Bozeman. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research policy, 29(.4-5), 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
  9. T. Kremic. (2003). Technology transfer: A contextual approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942532139
  10. I. W. Seo. (2017). The Impact of Licensed-technologies on the Financial Performance of Licensee Firms: Evidence from Public Technology in Korea. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 20(3), 664-683.
  11. Korea Trade, Industry and Energy. (Apr. 17, 2018). Technology Transfer And Commercialization Promotion Act, Act No. 15571.
  12. T. M. Khalil. (2000). Management of Technology: The Key to Competitiveness and Wealth Creation, NewYork : McGraw-Hill Science, Engineering & Mathematics.
  13. Y. H. Choi & J. J. Lee. (1998). Eeteminants of Effective Technology Transfer to SMEs ; A Case of Technology Property Rights Concession Program in Korea. Korean Policy Studies Review, 7(3), 353-372.
  14. J. S. Joo., S. K. Hong & S. H. Park. (2010). A Study on the Successful Technology Transfer for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 15(1), 73-83.
  15. Korea Science and ICT. (Jan. 16, 2018). Special Act on Support of Scientists And Engineers For Strengthening National Science And Technology Competitiveness, Act No. 15344.
  16. H. W. Chesbrough. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Massachusetts : Harvard Business Press.
  17. H. W. Chesbrough. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing innovation and change, 127(3), 34-41.
  18. S. K. Kim, B. Y. Jang, Y. J. Lee, J. K. Song, D. H. Yan, K. H. Lee & J. S. Choi. (2008). Open Innovation: Theory, Practices, and Policy Implications. Seoul : STEPI.
  19. L. A. Oerlemans, M. T. Meeus, & F. W. Boekema. (1998). Do networks matter for innovation? the usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 89(3), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00029
  20. K. Laursen, A. Salter. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  21. J. A. Kang. (2011. November). Open Innovation : Medicine? or Poison?. Review of Dong-A Business Review, 92, 106-108.
  22. J. H. Yun. (2017). Factors Affecting Technology Transfer of Government-funded Research Institutes. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 20(3), 519-545.
  23. M. S. Jung. (2017). The Effect of Commercialization Activities by using Basic Science and Technology on Technology and Business Performance of Enterprise : Case study on Mediating Effect of Technology Performance. Journal of digital convergence, 15(3), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.3.129
  24. W. H. Greene. (2003). Econometric Analysis, Delhi : Pearson Education India.
  25. M. Wedel, W. S. DeSarbo, J. R. Bult & V. Ramaswamy. (1993). A latent class Poisson regression model for heterogeneous count data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8(4), 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950080407