DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전통목구조의 골조유형에 따른 수평내력 비교 고찰

Comparative Review on the Horizontal Strength of Traditional Timber Structures According to Frame Types

  • 이민위 (명지대학교 대학원 건축학과) ;
  • 김영민 (명지대학교 건축학부)
  • 투고 : 2021.05.24
  • 심사 : 2021.06.30
  • 발행 : 2021.07.30

초록

In this study, structural performance of the traditional timber structure is investigated according to the frame types. As a result of reviewing six previous studies, frame type is divided into 1) Frame joinery method, 2) Column type and 3) Additional members. As a result of comparing the lateral strength at the limit of damage to the frame(1/120rad), the Mindori type frame was 3.2 times more substantial, and the Choikgong frame is 1.8 times stronger than the Jangyeo type frame. Based on the common frame, the tall frame is 2.2 times stronger. And, Pyeongbang added frame is 3.5 times larger and infilled wall added frame is 7.8 times larger than the basic frame consisted with Changbang and columns. There are 4 types of frame loading test specimens in the previous studies, a) single frame, b) multiple frame, c) two frame single frame, and d) partial frame. In addition, vertical load, joinery condition, and buried length per bay are confirmed as experimental variables that correlate with the lateral resistance performance of the frame.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 국토교통부 도시건축연구사업(한옥기술개발 3단계)의 연구비지원(21AUDP-B128638-05)에 의해 수행되었습니다.

참고문헌

  1. Han, J. S., & Kim, C. J. (2005). An Experimental Study on Mechanical Performance of Tenon for Analysis of Structural System and Modernization of Traditional Wooden Architecture. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction Section, 21(4), 121-128.
  2. Hong, S. G., & Lee, P. S. (2000). Behavior of Traditional Wood Frames Under Earthquake Loading. Proceedings of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea Conference, 304-313.
  3. Hwang, J. K., Lee, Y. W., & Hwang, J. S. (2013). Lateral Resistance Capacity Analysis of Traditional Wooden Structural Frame by Finite Element Method. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction Section, 29(8), 35-44.
  4. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association(JBDPA). (2004). Seismic Diagnosis and Reinforcement Method for Wooden Houses.
  5. Jeong, G. Y., Kong, J. H., & Song, J. K. (2015). Review of Lateral Resisting and Moment Carrying Capacity Studies for Wood to Wood Connections. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction Section, 31(5), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2015.31.5.13
  6. Jung, S. J., Hong, S. G., Kim, N. H., Hwang, J. G., & Bae, B. S. (2005). A Study on the Modeling Method for the Analysis of the Korean Traditional Wooden Frame. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction Section, 21(12), 77-84.
  7. Korean Construction Standards Center(KCSC). (2019). Small-Scale Architectural Structural Standard for Traditional Wooden Structure.
  8. Lee, P. S., & Hong, S. G. (1999). Behavior and Hysteresis Characteristics of Traditional Timber Frames under Lateral Load. Proceedings of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea Conference, 396-403.
  9. Lee, S. Y., Hwang, J. K., & Hong, S. G. (2010). Failure Modes by Dovetail Angle and Mechanical Modeling in the Dovetail Joint of Traditional Wooden Structures. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction Section, 26(12), 35-44.
  10. Lee, Y. W., Bae, B. S., Hong, S. G., Hwang, J. K., Kim, N. H., & Jeong, S. J. (2006). An Analytical Modelling of the Beam-Direction Frame of Traditional Wood Structure System. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction Section, 22(3), 29-36.
  11. Lee, Y. W., Hong, S. G., Hwang, J. K., & Bae, B. S. (2007). Capacity of Lateral Load Resistance of Dori-Directional Frame with Jangbu-Connection in Traditional Wood Structure System. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction Section, 23(2), 35-42.
  12. Lee, Y. W., Hong, S. G., Hwang, J. K., & Jeong, S. J. (2008). Experiments on the Lateral Load Capacity of End Lap Joint of Dori-Directional Frame. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction Section, 24(7), 29-36.
  13. Lee, G. M. (2013a). Purlin Structure and Beam Structure : East Asian Civilization and Structural Principles of Wooden Architecture, Seoul, Spacetime, 183-185.
  14. Lee, Y. W., Hwang, J.K., & Hwang, J. S. (2013b). Evaluation of Lateral Capacity Model of Traditional Wooden Structural Frame. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 15(6), 211-217.
  15. National Disaster Management Research Institute (NDMRI). (2009). Development of the Seismic Evaluation Method According to Seismic Capacity Evaluation Items on Wooden Structure.
  16. National Disaster Management Research Institute (NDMRI). (2010). Performance Stiffness Reduction Test Wall and Joint in Wood Structure.
  17. Park, C. Y., Kim, H. K., Eom, C. D., Kim, G. C., & Lee, J. J. (2014). Effect of Lintel on Horizontal Load-Carrying Capacity in Post-Beam Structure. The Japan Wood Research Society, 60, 30-38.
  18. Seo, J. M., Choi, I. K., Choun, Y. S., Lee, J. R., Shin, J. C., & Heo, T. Y. (1997a). A Study on the Structure and Lateral Loading Capacity of Wooden Frame of Ancient Commoner's House. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 1(2), 31-37.
  19. Seo, J. M., Choi, I. K., Choun, Y. S., Lee, J. R., & Shin, J. C. (1997b). Hysteretic Characteristics of Wooden Frames of Three-Bay-Straw-Roof House under Lateral Cyclic Load. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 1(3), 21-27.