DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 건축공사 흙막이공법 선정을 위한 Stochastic Gradient Tree Boosting 모델에 관한 연구

A Study on Stochastic Gradient Tree Boosting Model for the Retaining Wall Selection in Domestic Building Construction

  • Shin, Yoonseok (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyonggi University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.26
  • 심사 : 2021.06.30
  • 발행 : 2021.07.30

초록

The rise of land prices and population density in urban areas has led to a need for deeper excavations, both for the building ground and the underground. It is difficult to select a retaining wall method that is appropriate for a construction site, not only because the retaining wall method should be chosen at an early stage of a construction project, at which time there is a lack of information on surrounding characteristics of the site, but also because there are uncertain factors such as underground water and the underlying rock formation. An inappropriate retaining wall method may cause changes in the original design or method of retaining wall, resulting in an inevitable increase in construction costs. Despite this fact, construction practitioners generally select a retaining wall method depending on their own limited, subjective experience and intuition. For this reason, in this study, I applied the stochastic gradient tree boosting (SGTB) technique to selecting a retaining wall method to assess the applicability of the technique to a work method selection. To evaluate the SGTB technique's performance, I built the models using NN as well as SGTB and then compared the results between the models. As a result, it was found out that the SGTB is relatively more excellent and stable compared to NN model when it comes to selecting a retaining wall. Consequently SGTB is helpful to practitioners who need to determine the excavation work at building construction project.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 2018학년도 경기대학교 학술연구비(일반과제) 지원에 의하여 수행되었음.

참고문헌

  1. An, S. H., Park, U. Y., Kang, K. I., M. Cho Y., & Cho, H. H. (2007). Application of support vector machines in assessing conceptual cost estimates, J. Comput. Civil Eng, 21(4), pp 259-264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2007)21:4(259)
  2. Bahk, E. (2019). Enormous underground transit terminal to be built in Gangnam, The Korea Times, 2019 06 12 - accessed 2020 12 15, http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2019/06/113_270487.html
  3. Cheng, M. Y., Peng, H. S., Wu, Y. W., & Chen T. L. (2010). Estimate at completion for construction projects using evolutionary support vector machine inference model, Automation in Construction, 19(5), pp 619-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.02.008
  4. Chirici, G., Scotti, R., Montaghi, A., Barbati, A., Cartisano, R., Lopez, G., Marchetti, M., R. McRoberts, - E., Olsson, H., & Corona, P. (2013). Stochastic gradient boosting classification trees for forest fuel types mapping through airborne laser scanning and IRS LISS-III imagery, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 25, pp. 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.04.006
  5. Choi, M., & Lee, G. (2010). Decision tree for selecting retaining wall systems based on logistic regression analysis, Automation in Construction, 19(7), pp. 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.005
  6. Ding, H., Li, G., Dong, X., & Lin, Y. (2018). Prediction of Pillar Stability for Underground Mines using the Stochastic Gradient Boosting Technique, IEEE Access, 6, pp. 69253-69264. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2880466
  7. Elish, M. (2018). Enhance prediction of vulnerable web components using Stochastic Gradient Boosting Trees, International Journal of Web Information System, 15(2), pp. 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-05-2018-0041
  8. Feng, K. Y., Cai, Y. D., & Chou, K. C. (2005). Boosting classifier for predictinig protein domain structural class, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 334, pp. 213-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.06.075
  9. Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1996). Experiments with a new boosting algorithm, in Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference, 13, pp. 148-156.
  10. Friedman, J. H. (2002). Stochastic Gradient Boositng, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 38(4), pp 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2
  11. Friedman, J., & Meulman, J. (2003). Multiple additive regression trees with application in epidemiology, Statistics in Medicine, 22(9), pp. 1365-1381. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1501
  12. Godinho, S., Guiomar, N., & Gil, A. (2018). Estimating tree canopy cover percentage in a mediterranean silvopastoral systems using Sentinel-2A imagery and the stochastic gradient boosting algorithm, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(14), pp 4640-4662. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1399480
  13. Halteh, K., Kumar, K., & Gepp, A. (2018). Using Cutting-edge tree-based stochastic models to predict credit risk, Risks, 6(2), pp. 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6020055
  14. Kim, J. Y., Park, U. Y., & Kang, K. I. (2002). A study on the selection system of retaining wall methods using neural network, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 18(10), pp. 69-76.
  15. Kim, J. Y., Park U. Y., & Kim, G. H. (2006). A Study on the Selection of Retaining Wall Methods Using Neural Networks and Cased-based Reasoning, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 22(5), pp. 187-194.
  16. Kim, J. Y., Park, U. Y., Kim, G. H., & Kim, J. K. (2004). A Study on the Selection Model of Retaining Wall Methods Using Case-Based Reasoning, Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, 5(6), pp. 76-83.
  17. Kumar, P. R. & Ravi, V. (2007). Bankruptcy prediction in banks and firms via statistical and intelligent techniques - A review, European Journal of Operational Research, 180(1), pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.043
  18. Li, L., Wu, Y., & Ye, M. (2014). Multi-class Image Classification Based on Fast Stochastic Gradient Boosting, Informatica, 38(3), pp. 145-153.
  19. Ogutu, J. O., Piepho, H. P., & Schulz-Streeck, T. (2011). A comparison of random forests, boosting and support vector machines for genomic selection, BMC Proceedings, 5(S3) p. 11.
  20. Park, U. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2006). A study on the selection model of retaining wall methods using support vector machines, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 7(2), pp. 118-126.
  21. Sheu, H. B. (1996). Application of expert systems and neural networks for retaining wall system selection, Master's Thesis, Nat. Central Univ., Taiwan, R.O.C.
  22. Shin, Y. (2019). Application of stochastic gradient boosting approach to early prediction of safety accidents at construction site, Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1574297
  23. Tixier, A. J. P., Hallowell, M. R., Rajagopalan, B., & Bowman, D. (2016). Application of machine learning to construction injury prediction, Automation in Construction, 69, pp. 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.016
  24. Xu, Q., Xiong, Y., Dai, H., Kumari, K. M., Xu, Q., Ou, H. Y., & Wey, D. Q. (2017). PDC-SGB: Prediction of effective drug combinations using a stochastic gradient boosting algorithm, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 417, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.019
  25. Yang, J. B. (2002). A rule induction-based knowledge system for retaining wall selection, Expert Systems with Application, 23(3), pp. 273-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00047-7
  26. Yang, Y., Yin, J. H., Yuan, J. X., & Schulyer, J. N. (2003). An expert system for selection of retaining walls and groundwater controls in deep excavation, Computers and Geotechnics, 30(8), pp. 707-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2003.09.002
  27. Yau, N. J., & Yang, J. B. (1998). Applying case-based reasoning technique to retaining wall selection, Automation in Construction, 7(4), pp. 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(97)00072-1
  28. Yau, N. J., Yang, J. B., & Hsieh, T. Y. (1999). Inducing rules for selecting retaining wall systems, Construction Management and Economics, 17(1), pp. 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461999371853
  29. Zhou, J., Li, X. B., & Mitri, H. S. (2015). Comparative performance of six supervised learning methods for the development of models of pillar stability, Nature Hazards, 79(1), pp. 291-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1842-3