Korean Chemical Engineering Research

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers (한국화학공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Reactor Type on the Economy of the Ethanol Dehydration Process: Multitubular vs. Adiabatic Reactors

  • Yoo, Kee-Youn (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2021.06.16
  • Accepted : 2021.07.01
  • Published : 2021.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Abstract: A kinetic model was developed for the dehydration of ethanol to ethylene based on two parallel reaction pathways. Kinetic parameters were estimated by fitting experimental data of powder catalysts in a lab-scale test, and the effectiveness factor was determined using data from pellet-type catalysts in bench-scale experiments. The developed model was used to design a multitubular fixed-bed reactor (MTR) and an adiabatic reactor (AR) at a 10 ton per day scale. The two different reactor types resulted in different process configurations: the MTR consumed the ethanol completely and did not produce the reaction intermediate, diethyl ether (DEE), resulting in simple separation trains at the expense of high equipment cost for the reactor, whereas the AR required azeotropic distillation and cryogenic distillation to recycle the unreacted ethanol and to separate the undesired DEE, respectively. Quantitative analysis based on the equipment and annual energy costs showed that, despite high equipment cost of the reactor, the MTR process had the advantages of high productivity and simple separation trains, whereas the use of additional separation trains in the AR process increased both the total equipment cost and the annual energy cost per unit production rate.

Keywords

References

  1. Sun, J. and Wang, Y., "Recent Advances in Catalytic Conversion of Ethanol to Chemicals," ACS Catal., 4, 1078-1090(2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/cs4011343
  2. Zhang, M. and Yu, Y., "Dehydration of Ethanol to Ethylene," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52, 9505-9514(2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie401157c
  3. Galadima, A. and Muraza, O., "Zeolite Catalysts in Upgrading of Bioethanol to Fuels Range Hydrocarbons: A Review," J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 31, 1-14(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.07.015
  4. Kochar, N. K., Merims, R. and Padia, A. S., "Ethylene from Ethanol," Chem. Eng. Prog., 77, 66-70(1981).
  5. Mortensen, P. M., et al., "A Review of Catalytic Upgrading of Bio-oil to Engine Fuels," Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 407, 1-19(2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.08.046
  6. Ren, T., et al., "Petrochemicals From Oil, Natural Gas, Coal and Biomass: Production Costs in 2030-2050," Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 53(12), 653-663(2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.016
  7. Yakovleva, I. S., et al., "Catalytic Dehydration of Bioethanol to Ethylene," Catal. Ind., 8, 152-167(2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070050416020148
  8. Christiansen, M. A., Mpourmpakis, G. and Vlachos, D. G., "DFTdriven Multi-site Microkinetic Modeling of Ethanol Conversion to Ethylene and Diethyl Ether on γ-Al2O3(1 1 1)," J. Catal., 323, 121-131(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.024
  9. Kagyrmanova, A. P., et al., "Catalytic Dehydration of Bioethanol to Ethylene: Pilot-scale Studies and Process Simulation," Chem. Eng. J., 176-177, 188-194(2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.06.049
  10. Kang, M., Dewilde, J. F. and Bhan, A., "Kinetics and Mechanism of Alcohol Dehydration on γ-Al2O3: Effects of Carbon Chain Length and Substitution," ACS Catal., 5, 602-612(2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/cs501471r
  11. Roy, S., et al., "Mechanistic Study of Alcohol Dehydration on γ-Al2O3", ACS Catal., 2, 1846-1853(2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300176d
  12. Chiang, H. and Bhan, A., "Catalytic Consequences of Hydroxyl Group Location on the Rate and Mechanism of Parallel Dehydration Reactions of Ethanol Over Acidic Zeolites," J. Catal., 271, 251-261(2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.01.021
  13. Gayubo, A. G., et al., "Kinetic Model for the Transformation of Bioethanol Into Olefins over a HZSM-5 Zeolite Treated with Alkali," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 10836-10844(2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100407d
  14. Phillips, C. B. and Datta, R., "Production of Ethylene from Hydrous Ethanol on H-ZSM-5 Under Mild Conditions," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36, 4466-4475(1997). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9702542
  15. Phung, T. K. and Busca, G., "Diethyl Ether Cracking and Ethanol Dehydration: Acid Catalysis and Reaction Paths," Chem. Eng. J., 272, 92-101(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.008
  16. Reyniers, M. F. and Marin, G. B., "Experimental and Theoretical Methods in Kinetic Studies of Heterogeneously Catalyzed Reactions," Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng., 5, 563-594(2014). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040032
  17. DeWilde, J. F., et al., "Kinetics and Mechanism of Ethanol Dehydration on γ-Al2O3: The Critical Role of Dimer Inhibition," ACS Catal., 3, 798-807(2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/cs400051k
  18. DeWilde, J. F. and Bhan, A., "Kinetics and Site Requirements of Ether Disproportionation on γ-Al2O3", Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 502, 361-369(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.06.008
  19. Taarning, E., et al., "Zeolite-catalyzed Biomass Conversion to Fuels and Chemicals," Energy Environ. Sci., 4(3), 793-804(2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C004518G
  20. Gayubo, A. G., et al., "Kinetic Modelling of the Transformation of Aqueous Ethanol into Hydrocarbons on a HZSM-5 Zeolite," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40, 3467-3474(2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie001115e
  21. Alexopoulos, K., et al., "DFT-based Microkinetic Modeling of Ethanol Dehydration in H-ZSM-5," J. Catal., 339, 173-185(2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.04.020
  22. Haro, P., Ollero, P. and Trippe, F., "Technoeconomic Assessment of Potential Processes for Bio-ethylene Production," Fuel Process. Technol., 114, 35-48(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.03.024
  23. Becerra, J., Figueredo, M. and Cobo, M., "Thermodynamic and Economic Assessment of the Production of Light Olefins from Bioethanol," J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 5(2), 1554-1564(2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.02.035
  24. Jernberg, J., et al., Ethanol Dehydration to Green Ethylene. 2015, Lund: Lund University.
  25. Cameron, G., et al., Process Design for the Production of Ethylene from Ethanol. 2012, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
  26. Seo, J.-H., et al., "Influence of Binder on Fe-based Extrudate as Fischer-Tropsch Catalysts," Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 49(6), 726-731(2011). https://doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2011.49.6.726
  27. Jasra, R. V., et al., "Effect of Clay Binder on Sorption and Catalytic Properties of Zeolite Pellets," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(14), 3263-3272(2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie010953l
  28. Fogler, H. S., Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering. 1999, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  29. Boudart, M., "Two-step Catalytic Reactions," AlChE J., 18(3), 465-478(1972). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690180303
  30. Fuller, E. N., Schettler, P. D. and Giddings, J. C., "New Method for Prediction of Binary Gas-phase Diffusion Coefficients," Ind. Eng. Chem., 58(5), 18-27(1966). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50677a007
  31. Seider, W. D., et al., Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis and Design. 2008, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  32. Sinnott, R. K., Chemical Engineering Design. Vol. 6. 2005, New York, NY: Elsevier. 1056.
  33. Hall, S., Rules of Thumb for Chemical Engineers. 2012, Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  34. Douglas, J. M., Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes. 1988, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  35. Aguayo, A. T., et al., "Catalyst Deactivation by Coke in the Transformation of Aqueous Ethanol into Hydrocarbons. Kinetic Modeling and Acidity Deterioration of the Catalyst," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41, 4216-4224(2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie020068i
  36. Gayubo, A. G., et al., "Kinetic Modelling for the Transformation of Bioethanol Into Olefins on a Hydrothermally Stable Ni-HZSM-5 Catalyst Considering the Deactivation by Coke," Chem. Eng. J., 167, 262-277(2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.058
  37. Gayubo, A. G., et al., "Role of Water in the Kinetic Modeling of Methanol Transformation into Hydrocarbons on HZSM-5 Zeolite," Chem. Eng. Commun., 191, 944-967(2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/00986440490275831
  38. Campesi, M. A., et al., "Combustion of Volatile Organic Compounds on a MnCu Catalyst: A Kinetic Study," Catal. Today, 176(1), 225-228(2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2011.01.009
  39. Nowicki, L., Ledakowicz, S. and Bukur, D. B., "Hydrocarbon Selectivity Model for the Slurry Phase Fischer-tropsch Synthesis on Precipitated Iron Catalysts," Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(3), 1175-1180(2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00337-7
  40. Todic, B., et al., "Kinetic model of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis in a slurry reactor on Co-Re/Al2O3 catalyst," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(2), 669-679(2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie3028312
  41. Yang, J., et al., "Detailed kinetics of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on an industrial Fe-Mn catalyst," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(21), 5066-5090(2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie030135o
  42. Lim, H. W., et al., "Optimization of Methanol Synthesis Reaction on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3/ZrO2 Catalyst Using Genetic Algorithm: Maximization of the Synergetic Effect by the Optimal CO2 Fraction," Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27(6), 1760-1767(2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0311-7
  43. Park, N., et al., "Modeling and Analysis of a Methanol Synthesis Process Using a Mixed Reforming Reactor: Perspective on Methanol Production and CO2 Utilization," Fuel, 129, 163-172 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.03.068
  44. Wang, F., et al., "Coking Behavior of a Submicron MFI Catalyst During Ethanol Dehydration to Ethylene in a Pilot-scale Fixed-bed Reactor," Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 393, 161-170(2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.11.036
  45. Hong Kong Boilers and Pressure Vessels Authority, Code of Practice for Thermal Oil Heaters. 2008, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Labour Department.
  46. Couper, J. R., Chemical Process Equipment: Selection and Design. 1990, Amsterdam Boston: Elsevier. 755.
  47. Beste, A. and Overbury, S. H., "Pathways for Ethanol Dehydrogenation and Dehydration Catalyzed by Ceria (111) and (100) Surfaces," J. Phys. Chem. C, 119, 2447-2455(2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509686f
  48. Guo, S., et al., "Simulation of Adsorption, Diffusion, and Permeability of Water and Ethanol in NaA Zeolite Membranes," J. Membrane Sci., 376(1-2), 40-49(2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.043