Korean Journal of Environmental Biology (환경생물)

Korean Society of Environmental Biology (한국환경생물학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The study on diversity of macromoth community in two different forest types from agro and forest ecosystems

농업생태계와 산림생태계 숲 유형에 따른 대형나방 군집 다양성 연구

  • Lee, Jae-Young (Department of Biology, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Choi, Sei-Woong (Department of Environmental Education, Mokpo National University)
  • 이재영 (목포대학교 생명과학과) ;
  • 최세웅 (목포대학교 환경교육과)
  • Received : 2021.06.04
  • Accepted : 2021.06.21
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the macromoth diversity and species composition between two forest types; a small and fragmented agroecosystem(SFA) and a large and continuous forest ecosystem(LCF). We sampled moths twice(in June and August) using ultraviolet light traps employed in eight regions from 2018 to 2019. The results showed a significant difference between the two ecosystems; species richness, abundance and species diversity index (H') were significantly higher in LCF than in SFA. Beta diversity using Chao-Sorensen Raw abundance showed that moth community in SFA was different from that in LCF. The two components of beta diversity showed that the turnover rate was higher in LCF while nestedness was higher in SFA.

이 연구의 목적은 농업생태계에 존재하는 작고 파편화된 숲과 인근 산림생태계 내 연속된 숲에 서식하는 대형나방의 종 다양성과 종구성의 차이를 알아보는데 있다. 전남 서남부 8개 지역에서 2018과 2019년 6월과 8월 자외선 등 트랩을 이용하여 대형나방을 채집, 분석한 결과 두 숲 유형 간 뚜렷한 차이를 보였으며 두 그룹 간 종 수, 개체수, 종다양성 지수(H') 모두 산림생태계 숲이 농업생태계 숲보다 더 높게 나타났다. 유사도지수를 이용하여 나방 군집간 차이를 알아본 결과 농업생태계 숲에서 베타다양성이 높음을 확인하였다. 또한 종 구성의 변화율(Turnover)과 내포성(Nestedness)을 따로 나누어 분석한 결과 산림생태계는 종 구성 변화율이 큰 반면 농업생태계는 내포성이 비교적 크게 나타나 서식지 유형에 따라 나방 군집 구성의 차이가 다른 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

채집을 도와준 목포대학교 환경교육과 환경생태학 실험실 학생들에게 감사드립니다. 이 연구는 한국연구재단기초연구지원(2018R1D1A1B07046637)을 통해 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Baguette M, S Petit and F Queva. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 37:100-108. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00478.x
  2. Barton PS, SA Cunningham, AD Manning, H Gibb, DB Lindenmayer and RK Didham. 2013. The spatial scailing of beta diversity. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 22:639-647. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12031
  3. Beck J and CV Khen. 2007. Beta-diversity of geometrid moths from northern Borneo: effects of habitat, time and space. J. Anim. Ecol. 76:230-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01189.x
  4. Benton TG, DM Bryant, L Cole and HQP Crick. 2002. Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades. J. Appl. Ecol. 39:273-287.
  5. Benton TG, JA Vickry and JD Wilson. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:182-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9
  6. Bianchi FJJA, CJH Booij and T Tscharntke. 2006. Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: A review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273:1715-1727.
  7. Baselga A and CDL Orme. 2012. betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:808-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00224.x
  8. Baselga A. 2017. Partitioning abundance-based multiple-site dissimilarity into components: Balanced variation in abundance and abundance gradients. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8:799-808. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12693
  9. Chao A, RL Chazdon, RK Colwell and TJ Shen. 2005. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol. Lett. 8:148-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00707.x
  10. Choi SW and JS An. 2013. What we know and do not know about moth diversity from seven-year-monitoring in Mt. Jirisan National Park, South Korea. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 16:401-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2013.06.002
  11. Choi SW, M Park and H Kim. 2009. Differences in moth diversity in two types of forest patches in an agricultural landscape in southern Korea - Effects of habitat heterogeneity. J. Ecol. Envrion. 32:183-189. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2009.32.3.183
  12. Choi SW, NH Kim, BR Shin, JY Lee and BJ Jang. 2019. Trend of temporal change in moth communities in forests of the agricultural landscape of southwestern South Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 37:426-432. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2019.37.3.426
  13. Choi SW, DH Nho, SS Kim and KJ Hong. 2016. Spatio-temporal moth diversity (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of Mt. Baegun-san, Gwangyang, Jeonnam. Korean J. Ecol. Environ. 49:62-66. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2016.49.1.062
  14. Choi SW, BJ Jang, JY Lee and NH Kim. 2017. Moth Diversity (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of Bulgapsan Mountain, Younggwang, Jeonnam. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 35:47-56. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2017.35.1.047
  15. Colwell RK. 2013. EstimateS. Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User's Guide and Application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
  16. Dorp DV and PFM Opdam. 1987. Effects of patch size, isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Landscape Ecol. 1:59-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02275266
  17. Dover J and J Settele. 2009. The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. J. Insect Conserv. 13:3-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9135-8
  18. Ekroos J, J Heliola and M Kuussaari. 2010. Homogenization of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 47:459-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01767.x
  19. Hanski I, M Kuussaari and M Nieminen. 1994. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Ecology 75:747-762. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941732
  20. Hendrickx F, JP Maelfait, WV Wingerden, O Schweiger, M Speelmans, S Aviron, I Augenstein, R Billeter, D Bailey, R Bukacek, F Burel, T Diekotter, J Dirksen, F Herzog, J Liira, M Roubalova, V Vandomme and R Bugter. 2007. How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 44:340-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01270.x
  21. Kang WM, IS Koh, CY Park and DW Lee. 2012. An analysis of changes in forest fragmentation and morphology in surrounding landscapes of maeulsoops and Jinan-gun. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 26:941-951.
  22. Kim HS and CH Oh. 2011. Distribution characteristics of naturalized plants according to characteristics of landscape ecology in rural village of Korea. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 31:252-265. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2017.31.2.252
  23. Kim NH, SW Choi, JS Lee, JH Lee and KJ Ahn. 2018. Spatio-temporal changes of beetles and moths by habitat types in agricultural landscapes. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 36:180-189. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2018.36.2.180
  24. Kim SS, EA Beljaev and SH Oh. 2001. Illustrated Catalogue of Geometridae in Korea (Lepidoptera: Geometrinae, Ennominae). Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology & Center for Insect Systematics. Daejeon, Korea.
  25. Kim SS, SW Choi, JC Cheon, TW Kim and BW Lee. 2016. The Geometrid Moths of Korea (Lepidoptera:Geometridae). Junghaengsa. Seoul
  26. Kitching RL, AG Orr, L Thalib, H Mitchell, MS Hopkins and AW Graham. 2000. Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. J. Appl. Ecol. 37:284-297. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00490.x
  27. Kononenko VS, SB Ahn and L Ronkay. 1998. Illustrated Catalogue of Noctuidae in Korea (Lepidoptera). Insects of Korea 3. Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology & Center for Insect Systematics. Daejeon, Korea.
  28. Landau D, D Prowell and CE Carlton. 1999. Intensive versus long-term sampling to assess lepidopteran diversity in a southern mixed mesophytic forest. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 92:435-441. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/92.3.435
  29. McCune B and MJ Mefford. 2018. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 7.08. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR.
  30. National Institute of Biological Resource. 2019. National Species List of Korea III. Insects (Hexapoda). National Institute of Biological Resource. Incheon, Korea.
  31. R Development Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Ver. 3.4.3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
  32. Robinson RA and WJ Sutherland. 2002. Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J. Appl. Ecol. 39:157-176. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00695.x
  33. Schmidt BC and J Roland. 2006. Moth diversity in a fragmented habitat: importance of functional groups and landscape scale in the boreal forest. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 99:1110-1120. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2006)99[1110:MDIAFH]2.0.CO;2
  34. Shin YH. 2001. Colored Illustrations of the Moths of Korea. Academybook. Seoul.
  35. Socolar JB, JJ Gilroy, WE Kunin and DP Edwards. 2016. How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 31:67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.005
  36. Summerville KS, LM Ritterb and TO Crist. 2004. Forest moth taxa as indicators of lepidopteran richness and habitat disturbance: a preliminary assessment. Biol. Conserv. 116:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00168-X
  37. Summerville KS and TO Crist. 2004. Contrasting effects of habitat quantity and quality on moth communities in fragmented landscapes. Ecography 27:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03664.x
  38. Tilman D, KG Cassman, PA Matson, R Naylor and S Polasky. 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671-677. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014
  39. Tscharntke T, AM Klein, A Kruess, IS Dewenter and C Thies. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 8:857-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
  40. Tscharntke T, R Bommarco, Y Clough, TO Crist, D Kleijn, TA Rand, JM Tylianakis, SV Nouhuys and S Vidal. 2007. Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale. Biol. Control 43:294-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.006
  41. Usher MB and SWJ Keiller. 1998. The macrolepidoptera of farm woodlands: Determinants of diversity and community structure. Biodivers. Conserv. 7:725-748. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008836302193
  42. Yela JL and M Holyoak. 1997. Effects of moonlight and meteorological factors on light and bait trap catches of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Entomol. 26:1283-1290. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/26.6.1283