DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Role of Quantitative Electroencephalogram in the Diagnosis and Subgrouping of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

  • Bong, Su Hyun (Department of Psychiatry, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jun Won (Department of Psychiatry, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2021.04.16
  • Accepted : 2021.05.07
  • Published : 2021.07.01

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) leads to functional decline in academic performance, interpersonal relationships, and development in school-aged children. Early diagnosis and appropriate intervention can significantly reduce the functional decline caused by ADHD. Currently, there is no established biological marker for ADHD. Some studies have suggested that various indicators from the quantitative electroencephalogram (QEEG) may be useful biological markers for the diagnosis of ADHD. Until the 2010s, theta/beta ratio (TBR) was a biomarker candidate for ADHD that consistently showed high diagnostic value. However, limitations of TBR have recently been reported. Studies have demonstrated that phase-amplitude coupling, especially theta phase-gamma amplitude coupling, are related to cognitive dysfunction and may assist in the diagnosis of ADHD. As yet, the underlying mechanism is not clearly established, and the clinical efficacy of these biomarkers needs to be proven through well-controlled studies. Based on the heterogeneous characteristics of ADHD, subgrouping through QEEG plays a key role in diagnosis and treatment planning. Sophisticated, well-designed studies and meta-analyses are necessary to confirm these findings.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2018R1C1B5041143).

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association;2013.
  2. Sayal K, Prasad V, Daley D, Ford T, Coghill D. ADHD in children and young people: prevalence, care pathways, and service provision. Lancet Psychiatry 2018;5:175-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30167-0
  3. Biederman J, Faraone S, Milberger S, Curtis S, Chen L, Marrs A, et al. Predictors of persistence and remission of ADHD into adolescence: results from a four-year prospective follow-up study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1996;35:343-351. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199603000-00016
  4. Barkley RA, Fischer M, Edelbrock CS, Smallish L. The adolescent outcome of hyperactive children diagnosed by research criteria: I. An 8-year prospective follow-up study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1990;29:546-557. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199007000-00007
  5. Barkley RA, Fischer M, Smallish L, Fletcher K. The persistence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder into young adulthood as a function of reporting source and definition of disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 2002;111:279-289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.111.2.279
  6. Lara C, Fayyad J, de Graaf R, Kessler RC, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Angermeyer M, et al. Childhood predictors of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from the World Health Organization World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Biol Psychiatry 2009;65:46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.005
  7. Sonuga-Barke EJ, Halperin JM. Developmental phenotypes and causal pathways in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: potential targets for early intervention? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2010;51:368-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02195.x
  8. Ross DM, Ross SA. Hyperactivity: research, theory, and action. New York, NY: Wiley;1976.
  9. Gizer IR, Ficks C, Waldman ID. Candidate gene studies of ADHD: a meta-analytic review. Hum Genet 2009;126:51-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-009-0694-x
  10. Hart H, Radua J, Mataix-Cols D, Rubia K. Meta-analysis of fMRI studies of timing in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012;36:2248-2256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.003
  11. Lee MS, Park SB, Kim GM, Kim HJ, Park S, Kim Y, et al. The revised Korean practice parameter for the treatment of attentiondeficit hyperactivity disorder (II)-diagnosis and assessment. J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017;28:58-69. https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.2017.28.2.58
  12. Hunter AM, Muthen BO, Cook IA, Leuchter AF. Antidepressant response trajectories and quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) biomarkers in major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res 2010;44:90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.06.006
  13. Jokic-Begic N, Begic D. Quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) in combat veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Nord J Psychiatry 2003;57:351-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480310002688
  14. Kim JW, Lee YS, Han DH, Min KJ, Lee J, Lee K. Diagnostic utility of quantitative EEG in un-medicated schizophrenia. Neurosci Lett 2015;589:126-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.12.064
  15. Alper KR, Prichep LS, Kowalik S, Rosenthal MS, John ER. Persistent QEEG abnormality in crack cocaine users at 6 months of drug abstinence. Neuropsychopharmacology 1998;19:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(97)00211-X
  16. Tot S, Ozge A, Comelekoglu U, Yazici K, Bal N. Association of QEEG findings with clinical characteristics of OCD: evidence of left frontotemporal dysfunction. Can J Psychiatry 2002;47:538-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370204700605
  17. Monastra VJ, Lubar JF, Linden M, VanDeusen P, Green G, Wing W, et al. Assessing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via quantitative electroencephalography: an initial validation study. Neuropsychology 1999;13:424-433. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.13.3.424
  18. Barry RJ, Clarke AR. Spontaneous EEG oscillations in children, adolescents, and adults: typical development, and pathological aspects in relation to AD/HD. J Psychophysiol 2009;23:157-173. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.23.4.157
  19. Mann CA, Lubar JF, Zimmerman AW, Miller CA, Muenchen RA. Quantitative analysis of EEG in boys with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder: controlled study with clinical implications. Pediatr Neurol 1992;8:30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-8994(92)90049-5
  20. Lubar JF. Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Biofeedback Self Regul 1991;16:201-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000016
  21. Snyder SM, Hall JR. A meta-analysis of quantitative EEG power associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006;23:440-455
  22. Snyder SM, Quintana H, Sexson SB, Knott P, Haque AF, Reynolds DA. Blinded, multi-center validation of EEG and rating scales in identifying ADHD within a clinical sample. Psychiatry Res 2008;159:346-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.05.006
  23. FDA. De novo classification request for neuropsychiatric EEG-based assessment aid for ADHD (NEBA) system [updated 2013; cited 2021 Apr 15]. Available from URL: www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K112711.pdf.
  24. FDA. FDA permits marketing of first brain wave test to help assess children and teens for ADHD [updated 2013 Jul 15; cited 2021 Apr 15]. Available from URL: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm360811.htm.
  25. Barry RJ, Clarke AR, Johnstone SJ, Brown CR. EEG differences in children between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:1806-1811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.006
  26. Barry RJ, Clarke AR, Johnstone SJ, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M. Electroencephalogram theta/beta ratio and arousal in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence of independent processes. Biol Psychiatry 2009;66:398-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.04.027
  27. Clarke AR, Barry RJ, Dupuy FE, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M, Johnstone SJ. Excess beta activity in the EEG of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a disorder of arousal? Int J Psychophysiol 2013;89:314-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.04.009
  28. Clarke AR, Barry RJ, Karamacoska D, Johnstone SJ. The EEG theta/beta ratio: a marker of arousal or cognitive processing capacity? Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2019;44:123-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-09428-6
  29. Coolidge FL, Starkey MT, Cahill BS. Comparison of a parent-rated DSM-IV measure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and quantitative EEG parameters in an outpatient sample of children. J Clin Neurophysiol 2007;24:348-351. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0b013e318067bcfc
  30. Ogrim G, Kropotov J, Hestad K. The quantitative EEG theta/beta ratio in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and normal controls: sensitivity, specificity, and behavioral correlates. Psychiatry Res 2012;198:482-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.041
  31. Buyck I, Wiersema JR. Resting electroencephalogram in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: developmental course and diagnostic value. Psychiatry Res 2014;216:391-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.055
  32. Loo SK, Cho A, Hale TS, McGough J, McCracken J, Smalley SL. Characterization of the theta to beta ratio in ADHD: identifying potential sources of heterogeneity. J Atten Disord 2013;17:384-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712468050
  33. Arns M, Conners CK, Kraemer HC. A decade of EEG theta/beta ratio research in ADHD: a meta-analysis. J Atten Disord 2013;17:374-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712460087
  34. Snyder SM, Rugino TA, Hornig M, Stein MA. Integration of an EEG biomarker with a clinician's ADHD evaluation. Brain Behav 2015;5:e00330.
  35. Loo SK, Arns M. Should the EEG-based theta to beta ratio be used to diagnose ADHD? The ADHD Report 2015;23:8-13.
  36. Arns M, Loo SK, Sterman MB, Heinrich H, Kuntsi J, Asherson P, et al. Editorial perspective: how should child psychologists and psychiatrists interpret FDA device approval? Caveat emptor. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2016;57:656-658. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12524
  37. Stein MA, Snyder SM, Rugino TA, Hornig M. Commentary: objective aids for the assessment of ADHD-further clarification of what FDA approval for marketing means and why NEBA might help clinicians. A response to Arns et al. (2016). J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2016;57:770-771. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12534
  38. Canolty RT, Knight RT. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn Sci 2010;14:506-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.001
  39. Jerath R, Beveridge C, Jensen M. On the hierarchical organization of oscillatory assemblies: layered superimposition and a global bioelectric framework. Front Hum Neurosci 2019;13:426. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00426
  40. Sacks DD, Schwenn PE, McLoughlin LT, Lagopoulos J, Hermens DF. Phase-amplitude coupling, mental health and cognition: implications for adolescence. Front Hum Neurosci 2021;15:622313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.622313
  41. Kaminski M, Brzezicka A, Kaminski J, Blinowska KJ. Coupling between brain structures during visual and auditory working memory tasks. Int J Neural Syst 2019;29:1850046. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065718500466
  42. Axmacher N, Henseler MM, Jensen O, Weinreich I, Elger CE, Fell J. Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:3228-3233. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911531107
  43. Doesburg SM, Vinette SA, Cheung MJ, Pang EW. Theta-modulated gamma-band synchronization among activated regions during a verb generation task. Front Psychol 2012;3:195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00195
  44. Gonzalez-Trejo E, Mogele H, Pfleger N, Hannemann R, Strauss DJ. Electroencephalographic phase-amplitude coupling in simulated driving with varying modality-specific attentional demand. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 2019;49:589-598. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2019.2931011
  45. Lee TH, Kim M, Hwang WJ, Kim T, Kwak YB, Kwon JS. Relationship between resting-state theta phase-gamma amplitude coupling and neurocognitive functioning in patients with first-episode psychosis. Schizophr Res 2020;216:154-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.12.010
  46. Won GH, Kim JW, Choi TY, Lee YS, Min KJ, Seol KH. Thetaphase gamma-amplitude coupling as a neurophysiological marker in neuroleptic-naive schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2018;260:406-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.021
  47. Kim JW, Lee J, Kim BN, Kang T, Min KJ, Han DH, et al. Thetaphase gamma-amplitude coupling as a neurophysiological marker of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Neurosci Lett 2015;603:25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2015.07.006
  48. Kim JW, Kim BN, Lee J, Na C, Kee BS, Min KJ, et al. Desynchronization of theta-phase gamma-amplitude coupling during a mental arithmetic task in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. PLoS One 2016;11:e0145288. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145288
  49. Hurtig T, Ebeling H, Taanila A, Miettunen J, Smalley SL, McGough JJ, et al. ADHD symptoms and subtypes: relationship between childhood and adolescent symptoms. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007;46:1605-1613. https://doi.org/10.1097/chi.0b013e318157517a
  50. Epstein JN, Loren RE. Changes in the definition of ADHD in DSM-5: subtle but important. Neuropsychiatry (London) 2013;3:455-458. https://doi.org/10.2217/npy.13.59
  51. Lecei A, van Hulst BM, de Zeeuw P, van der Pluijm M, Rijks Y, Durston S. Can we use neuroimaging data to differentiate between subgroups of children with ADHD symptoms: a proof of concept study using latent class analysis of brain activity. Neuroimage Clin 2019;21:101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.11.011
  52. Qureshi MN, Min B, Jo HJ, Lee B. Multiclass classification for the differential diagnosis on the ADHD subtypes using recursive feature elimination and hierarchical extreme learning machine: structural MRI study. PLoS One 2016;11:e0160697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160697
  53. Qian X, Castellanos FX, Uddin LQ, Loo BRY, Liu S, Koh HL, et al. Large-scale brain functional network topology disruptions underlie symptom heterogeneity in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuroimage Clin 2019;21:101600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.11.010
  54. Karalunas SL, Nigg JT. Heterogeneity and subtyping in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-considerations for emerging research using person-centered computational approaches. Biol Psychiatry 2020;88:103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.11.002
  55. Clarke AR, Barry RJ, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M. EEG-defined subtypes of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:2098-2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00668-X
  56. Llinas RR, Ribary U, Jeanmonod D, Kronberg E, Mitra PP. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia: a neurological and neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by magnetoencephalography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:15222-15227. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.26.15222
  57. Bussalb A, Collin S, Barthelemy Q, Ojeda D, Bioulac S, BlascoFontecilla H, et al. Is there a cluster of high theta-beta ratio patients in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder? Clin Neurophysiol 2019;130:1387-1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.02.021
  58. Clarke AR, Barry RJ, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M. Excess beta activity in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an atypical electrophysiological group. Psychiatry Res 2001;103:205-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1781(01)00277-3
  59. Clarke AR, Barry RJ, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M. EEG differences between good and poor responders to methylphenidate and dexamphetamine in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:194-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00736-2
  60. Clarke AR, Barry RJ, Dupuy FE, Heckel LD, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M, et al. Behavioural differences between EEG-defined subgroups of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122:1333-1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.12.038
  61. Loo SK, McGough JJ, McCracken JT, Smalley SL. Parsing heterogeneity in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder using EEG-based subgroups. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2018;59:223-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12814
  62. Byeon J, Choi TY, Won GH, Lee J, Kim JW. A novel quantitative electroencephalography subtype with high alpha power in ADHD: ADHD or misdiagnosed ADHD? PLoS One 2020;15:e0242566. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242566