Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow

Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society (대한견·주관절의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Long-term outcomes of initially conservatively treated midshaft clavicle fractures

  • Lee, Gwan Bum (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyojune (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeon, In-Ho (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Koh, Kyoung Hwan (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2020.12.18
  • Accepted : 2021.01.20
  • Published : 2021.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Recent studies about completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures have reported that their nonunion/malunion rates were significantly higher in conservatively treated patients compared to surgically treated patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with treatment decisions for midshaft clavicle fractures and also the factors that affect patient satisfaction with their treatment choice. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 75 patients who had been diagnosed with a midshaft clavicle fracture and were treated conservatively at a single institution between March 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. Their medical records were reviewed to investigate the severity of the initial vertical displacement. A telephone survey was carried out to identify the presence of any patient-perceived deformity and determine if the patient eventually underwent surgery and whether the patient would prefer surgery if the injury recurred. Results: Significantly more patients with vertical displacement ≥100% (9/28) eventually underwent surgery compared to patients with vertical displacement <100% (3/32, p=0.028). Patients with vertical displacement ≥100% (13/28) were significantly more likely to prefer surgery compared to patients with vertical displacement <100% (7/32, p=0.044). Among the conservatively treated patients, nine of 32 participants with a patient-perceived deformity and one of 16 without a patient-perceived deformity responded that they would prefer to receive surgery in same situation in the future (p=0.079). Conclusions: Patients with a midshaft clavicle fracture with vertical displacement of ≥100% may eventually require surgical treatment. When conservative treatment is carried out, the long-term patient results may be unsatisfactory due to perceived residual deformities.

Keywords

References

  1. Nordqvist A, Petersson C. The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;(300):127-32.
  2. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:452-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.126613
  3. NEER CS 2nd. Nonunion of the clavicle. J Am Med Assoc 1960;172:1006-11. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1960.03020100014003
  4. Rowe CR. An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968;58:29-42.
  5. Fuglesang HF, Flugsrud GB, Randsborg PH, Stavem K, Utvag SE. Radiological and functional outcomes 2.7 years following conservatively treated completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016;136:17-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2354-z
  6. Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Johnston RV, Belloti JC, Faloppa F. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(6):CD009363.
  7. McKee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:675-84. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01364
  8. Woltz S, Stegeman SA, Krijnen P, et al. Plate fixation compared with nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017;99:106-12. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01394
  9. Eskola A, Vainionpaa S, Myllynen P, Patiala H, Rokkanen P. Outcome of clavicular fracture in 89 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1986;105:337-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449938
  10. Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AE. Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86:1359-65. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200407000-00002
  11. Slover J, Shue J, Koenig K. Shared decision-making in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:1046-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2156-8
  12. Kellam JF, Meinberg EG, Agel J, et al. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018: International Comprehensive Classification of Fractures and Dislocations Committee. J Orthop Trauma 2018;32 Suppl 1:S1-170.
  13. Omid R, Kidd C, Yi A, Villacis D, White E. Measurement of clavicle fracture shortening using computed tomography and chest radiography. Clin Orthop Surg 2016;8:367-72. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2016.8.4.367
  14. Plocher EK, Anavian J, Vang S, Cole PA. Progressive displacement of clavicular fractures in the early postinjury period. J Trauma 2011;70:1263-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182166a6f
  15. Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994;3:347-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0
  16. Nencini S, Ivanusic JJ. The physiology of bone pain. how much do we really know. Front Physiol 2016;7:157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00157
  17. Cha SD, Chung ST, Kim YH, Park SJ. The analysis of conservative treatment in midshaft fractures of clavicle. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc 2010;13:27-33. https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2010.13.1.027