Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

영남대 의대 학술지 편집위원회 (Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute Medical Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review

  • Kim, Sungjin (Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital) ;
  • Kang, Sung Il (Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sohyun (Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jae Hwang (Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2020.12.14
  • 심사 : 2021.01.13
  • 발행 : 2021.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Omental transposition has been used to facilitate perineal wound healing in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR). However, there is no high-level evidence supporting the effectiveness of omental transposition in this regard. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after APR. Methods: In this systematic review, we systematically searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for literature regarding the topic of our study. Studies published since the inception of each database were considered for review. The outcomes of interest were the perineal wound healing rate at 1 and 3 months postoperatively, perineal wound infection rate, and perineal wound healing period. Results: Of the 1,923 studies identified, four articles representing 819 patients (omental transposition patients, n=295) were included in the final analysis. The wound healing rates at 1 and 3 months postoperatively in the omental transposition group (68.5% and 79.7%, respectively) did not significantly differ from those in the control group (57.4% and 78.7%, respectively) (p=0.759 and p=0.731, respectively). Perineal wound infection and chronic wound complication rates, including sinus, dehiscence, and fistula rates, also did not significantly differ between the omental transposition (8% and 7%, respectively) and control (11% and 7%, respectively) groups (p=0.221 and p=0.790, respectively). Conclusion: Our results suggest that omental transposition does not affect perineal wound healing in patients who undergo APR.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Miles WE. A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon (1908). CA Cancer J Clin 1971;21:361-4. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.21.6.361
  2. Nilsson PJ. Omentoplasty in abdominoperineal resection: a review of the literature using a systematic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1354-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0643-x
  3. Mohammed S, Anaya DA, Awad SS, Albo D, Berger DH, Artinyan A. Sphincter preservation rates after radical resection for rectal cancer in the United States veteran population: opportunity for improvement in early disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:216-23. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4101-z
  4. Tompkins RG, Warshaw AL. Improved management of the perineal wound after proctectomy. Ann Surg 1985;202:760-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198512000-00016
  5. Fingerhut A, Hay JM, Delalande JP, Paquet JC. Passive vs. closed suction drainage after perineal wound closure following abdominoperineal rectal excision for carcinoma. A multicenter, controlled trial. The French Association for Surgical Research. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:926-32.
  6. Artioukh DY, Smith RA, Gokul K. Risk factors for impaired healing of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection of rectum for carcinoma. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:362-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01159.x
  7. Musters GD, Sloothaak DA, Roodbeen S, van Geloven AA, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a two-centre experience in the era of intensified oncological treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29:1151-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1967-y
  8. John H, Buchmann P. Improved perineal wound healing with the omental pedicle graft after rectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:193-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341389
  9. Wiatrek RL, Thomas JS, Papaconstantinou HT. Perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2008;21:76-85. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1055325
  10. El-Gazzaz G, Kiran RP, Lavery I. Wound complications in rectal cancer patients undergoing primary closure of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:1962-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b71ef9
  11. Nisar PJ, Scott HJ. Myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvis after abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11:806-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01743.x
  12. Hultman CS, Sherrill MA, Halvorson EG, Lee CN, Boggess JF, Meyers MO, et al. Utility of the omentum in pelvic floor reconstruction following resection of anorectal malignancy: patient selection, technical caveats, and clinical outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:559-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181ce3947
  13. de Bruin AF, Gosselink MP, Wijffels NA, Coene PP, van der Harst E. Local gentamicin reduces perineal wound infection after radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection. Tech Coloproctol 2008;12:303-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0440-8
  14. Sumrien H, Newman P, Burt C, McCarthy K, Dixon A, Pully-blank A, et al. The use of a negative pressure wound management system in perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2016;20:627-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1495-6
  15. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  16. Wang JY, Huang CJ, Hsieh JS, Huang YS, Juang YF, Huang TJ. Management of the perineal wounds following excision of the rectum for malignancy. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 1994; 10:177-81.
  17. Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Paquet JC, Flamant Y. Management of the pelvic space with or without omentoplasty after abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the rectum: a prospective multi-center study. The French Association for Surgical Research. Eur J Surg 1997;163:199-206.
  18. Blok RD, Musters GD, Borstlap WA, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, et al. Snapshot study on the value of omentoplasty in abdominoperineal resection with primary perineal closure for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:729-36.
  19. Miles WE. Technique of the radical operation for cancer of the rectum. Br J Surg 1914;2:292-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800020609
  20. Oates GD, Williams JA. Primary closure of the perineal wound in excision of the rectum. Proc R Soc Med 1970;63(Suppl 1):128.
  21. Broader JH, Masselink BA, Oates GD, Alexander-Williams J. Management of the pelvic space after proctectomy. Br J Surg 1974;61:94-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800610204
  22. Ruckley CV, Smith AN, Balfour TW. Perineal closure by omental graft. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970;131:300-2.
  23. Killeen S, Devaney A, Mannion M, Martin ST, Winter DC. Omental pedicle flaps following proctectomy: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2013;15:e634-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12394
  24. Collins D, Hogan AM, O'Shea D, Winter DC. The omentum: anatomical, metabolic, and surgical aspects. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:1138-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0855-1
  25. Moreaux J, Horiot A, Barrat F, Mabille J. Obliteration of the pelvic space with pedicled omentum after excision of the rectum for cancer. Am J Surg 1984;148:640-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(84)90342-8
  26. Smith SR, Swift I, Gompertz H, Baker WN. Abdominoperineal and anterior resection of the rectum with retrocolic omentoplasty and no drainage. Br J Surg 1988;75:1012-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800751020
  27. Marks CG, Leighton M, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR. Primary suture of the perineal wound following rectal excision for adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 1976;63:322-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800630417
  28. Dencker H, Norryd C, Tranberg KG. Management of the perineal wound after rectal excision. Acta Chir Scand 1973;139: 568-70.
  29. Ferguson CM. Use of omental pedicle grafts in abdominoperineal resection. Am Surg 1990;56:310-2.
  30. Blok RD, Hagemans JA, Klaver CE, Hellinga J, van Etten B, Burger JW, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on omentoplasty for the management of abdominoperineal defects in patients treated for cancer. Ann Surg 2020;271:654-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003266