DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

How Effectively Safety Incentives Work? A Randomized Experimental Investigation

  • Ahmed, Ishfaq (Hailey College of Commerce, University of the Punjab) ;
  • Faheem, Asim (College of Business Administration, Imam Abdul Rehman Bin Faisal University)
  • Received : 2019.03.25
  • Accepted : 2020.08.11
  • Published : 2021.03.30

Abstract

Background: Incentive and penalty (I/P) programs are commonly used to increase employees' safety outcomes, but its influence on employees' safety outcomes is under-investigated. Moreover, under developed economies lack safety culture and there is dearth of literature focusing on empirical studies over there [1]. Based on these gaps, this study attempts to see the impact of I/P programs on safety outcomes in a developing country. Methods: The study was carried out in three stages, where Stage I revealed that selected 45 organizations were deficit of safety culture and practices, while only three firms were found good at safety practices. At Stage II, these three firms were divided in two clusters (groups), and were probed further at Stage III. At this stage group, one was manipulated by providing incentives (experimental group) and employees' responses in terms of safety motivation and performance were noticed. Results: It was observed that the experimental group's safety motivation and performance had improved (both for immediate and 1-month later performance). The results were further probed at Phase 3 (after 3 months), where it was found that the benefits of I/P programs were not long lasting and started replenishing. Conclusion: Findings of the study helped researchers conclude that safety incentives have only short-term influence on safety outcomes, while a long-term and permanent solution should be found.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge the contribution made by editorial team members and reviewers who made constructive comments to improve this article. They are also thankful to workers and contractors who helped them in data collection and accepted their repeated visits, open heartedly, at the work sites.

References

  1. Ahmed I, Shaukat MZ, Usman A, et al. Occupational health and safety issues in informal economic segment of Pakistan: a survey of construction sites. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2017;24(2):240-50.
  2. Vinodkumar MN, Bhasi M. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivaiton. Accid Anal Prev 2010;42(6):2082-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021
  3. Hinze J, Applegate LL. Costs of construction injuries. J Constr Eng Manag 1991;(117):537-50.
  4. Leung MU, Chan IM, Yu J. Preventing construction worker injury incidents through the management of personal stress and organizational stressors. Accid Anal Prev 2012;(48):156-66.
  5. Teo EA, Ling FY. Developing a model to measure the effectiveness of safety management system of construction sites. Build Environ 2006;41(11):1584-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.06.005
  6. Shakioye SO, Haight JM. Modeling using dynamic variablesdan approach for the design of loss prevention programs. Saf Sci 2010;48(1):46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.04.008
  7. Clarke S. The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a meta-analytic review. J Occup Health Psycho 2010;11(4):315-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315
  8. Neal A, Griffin MA, Hart PM. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Saf Sci 2000;34(1-3):99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4
  9. Singer S, Falwell A, Gaba D, et al. Relationship of safety climate and safety performance in hospitals. Health Serv Res 2009;42(2):399-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00918.x
  10. Siu OL, Phillips DR, Leung TW. Safety climate and safety performance among construction workers in Hong Kong: the role of psychological strains as mediator. Accid Anal Prev 2004;36(3):359-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00016-2
  11. Zhang J, Chen N, Fu G, et al. The safety attitude of senior managers in the Chinese coal industry. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13(11):1147. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111147
  12. Hofmann DA, Jacobs R, Landy F. High reliability process industries: individual, micro and macro organizational influences on safety performance. J Saf Res 1995;26:131-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(95)00011-E
  13. Krause TR, Seymour KJ, Sloat KM. Long-term evaluation of a behavior-based method for improving safety performance: a meta-analysis of 73 interrupted time-series replications. Saf Sci 1999;32(1):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(99)00007-7
  14. Mearns K, Whitaker SM, Flin R. Safety climate, safety management practices and safety performance in offshore environment. Saf Sci 2003;41(8):641-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00011-5
  15. Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol 2006;91(4):946-53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
  16. Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol 2000;5(3):347-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
  17. Oyewole SA, Haight JM. Making the business case: assessment of safety intervention and optimization of resource allocation. In: Proceedings of the ASSE professional development conference and exhibition; 2007 June 24-27; Orlando, Florida 2009.
  18. Bansal V. Application of geographic information systems in construction safety planning. Int J Proj Manag 2011;29(1):66-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.007
  19. Benjaroran V, Bhokha S. An integrated safety management with construction management using 4D CAD model. Saf Sci 2010;(48):395-403.
  20. Lai DC, Liu M, Ling FY. A comparative study on adopting human resource practices for safety management on construction projects in the United States and Singapore. Int J Proj Manag 2010;(29):1008-32.
  21. Hasan A, Jha KN. Acceptance of the incentive/disincentive contracting strategy in developing construction markets: empirical study from India. J Constr Eng Manag 2015;142(2):04015064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001048
  22. Wilde GJ. Risk homeostasis theory: an overview. Inj Prev 1998;18(2):89-91. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.4.2.89
  23. Herath T, Rao HR. Protection motivation and deterrence: a framework for security policy compliance in organizations. Eur J Inf Syst 2009;18(2):106-25. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.6
  24. Draganidis F, Mentzas G. Competency based management: a review of systems and approaches. Inf Manag Comput Secur 2006;14(1):51-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220610648373
  25. Teo EL, Ling FY, Chong AW. Framework for project managers to manage construction safety. Int J Proj Manag 2005;(23):329-41.
  26. Hinze J. Safety incentives: do they reduce injuries? Pract Period Struct Des Const 2002;(7):81-4. ASCE.
  27. Stukhart G. Contractual incentives. J Constr Eng Manag 1984;110(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1984)110:1(34)
  28. Molenaar KR, Jeong II P, Washington S. Framework for measuring corporate safety culture and its impact on construction safety performance. J Constr Eng Manag 2009;135(6):488-96. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:6(488)
  29. Hasan A, Jha KN. Safety incentive and penalty provisions in Indian construction projects and their impact on safety performance. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2013;20(1):3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2011.648676
  30. Kadefors A. Trust in project relationship e inside the black box. Int J Proj Manag 2004;(22):175-82.
  31. Gangwar M, Goodrum PM. The effect of time on safety incentive programs in the US construction industry. Const Manag Econ 2005;23(8):851-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500184527
  32. Hinze J, Gambatese J. Factors that influence safety performance of specialty contractors. J Constr Eng Manag 2003;(129):159-64. ASCE.
  33. Ghasemi F, Mohammadfam I, Soltanian AR, et al. Surprising incentive: an instrument for promoting safety performance of construction employees. Saf Health Work 2015;6(3):227-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2015.02.006
  34. Chan MW, Chan PC. Empirical study of the risks and difficulties in implementing guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in construction. J Constr Eng Manag 2010;(136):495-507. ASCE.
  35. Blau PM. Social exchange. Int Encycl Soc Sci 1968;7:452-7.
  36. Savlovschi LI, Robu NR. The role of SMEs in modern economy. Econ Seria Manag 2011;14(1):277-81.
  37. Cheng EW, Stephen K, Ryan N. Use of safety management practices for improving project performance. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2013;22(1):33-9(2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2013.844715
  38. Kirk RE. Experimental design. London: John Wiley & Sons; 1982.
  39. DeJoy DM, Schaffer BS, Wilson MG, et al. Creating safer workplaces: assessing the determinants and role of safety climate. J Saf Res 2004;35(1):81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.018
  40. Inness M, Turner N, Barling J, et al. Transformational leadership and employee safety performance: a within-person, between jobs design. J Occup Health Psychol 2010;15(3):279-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019380
  41. Farooqui RU, Arif F, Rafeeqi SFA. Safety performance in construction industry of Pakistan. In: Paper presented at: First International conference on construction in developing countries (ICCIDC-I). Advancing and integrating construction education: research & practices 2008 Aug 4-5. Karachi.
  42. Pandita S. Reaching the unreachable: social security for informal workers in India [Internet]; 2006 [Internet] [cited 2017, June 17]. Available from: http://www.amrc.org.hk/content/reaching-unreachable-social-securityinformalworkers-india.
  43. Kohn A. Why incentive plans cannot work? Harv Bus Rev 1993;71(5):54-62.

Cited by

  1. A Qualitative Study on Nurses’ Experiences of Reporting Patient Safety Incidents in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia vol.11, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v11i3.38400