DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quantitative microbial risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus foodborne illness of sea squirt (Halocynthia roretzi) in South Korea

  • Kang, Joohyun (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Lee, Yewon (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Choi, Yukyung (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Kim, Sejeong (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Ha, Jimyeong (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Oh, Hyemin (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Kim, Yujin (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Seo, Yeongeun (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Park, Eunyoung (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Rhee, Min Suk (Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Heeyoung (Korea Food Research Institute) ;
  • Yoon, Yohan (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • Received : 2020.11.24
  • Accepted : 2021.01.26
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

The annual consumption of fishery products, particularly sea squirt (Halocynthia roretzi), per person has steadily increased in South Korea. However, the quantitative risk of Vibrio parahaemolyticus following intake of sea squirt has not been analyzed. This study focuses on quantitative predictions of the probability of consuming sea squirt and getting of V. parahaemolyticus foodborne illness. The prevalence of V. parahaemolyticus in sea squirt was evaluated, and the time spent by sea squirt in transportation vehicles, market displays, and home refrigerators, in addition to the temperature of each of these, were recorded. The data were fitted to the @RISK program to obtain a probability distribution. Predictive models were developed to determine the fate of V. parahaemolyticus under distribution conditions. A simulation model was prepared based on experimental data, and a dose-response model for V. parahaemolyticus was prepared using data from literature to estimate infection risk. V. parahaemolyticus contamination was detected in 6 of 35 (17.1%) sea squirt samples. The daily consumption quantity of sea squirt was 62.14 g per person, and the consumption frequency was 0.28%. The average probability of V. parahaemolyticus foodborne illness following sea squirt consumption per person per day was 4.03 × 10-9. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of foodborne illness caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus following sea squirt consumption in South Korea.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by a grant (17162MFDS035) from Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2018.

References

  1. Baranyi J, Roberts TA. A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. Int J Food Microbiol. 1994;23:277-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(94)90157-0
  2. Baranyi J, Ross T, McMeekin TA, Roberts TA. Effects of parameterization on the performance of empirical models used in 'predictive microbiology'. Food Microbiol. 1996;13:83-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.1996.0011
  3. Codex Alimentarius Commission [CAC]. Principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2019 Aug 31]. http://www.fao.org/3/y1579e/y1579e05.htm
  4. Feldhusen F. The role of seafood in bacterial foodborne diseases. Microbes Infect. 2000;2:1651-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01321-6
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016: contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome: FAO; 2016. p. 200.
  6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018: meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome: FAO; 2018. p. 227.
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO], World Health Organization [WHO]. Risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Aug 10]. http://www.fao.org/3/i2225e/i2225e00.pdf
  8. Food and Drug Administration [FDA]. Bad bug book: handbook of foodborne pathogenic microorganisms and natural toxins [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Sep 6]. https://www.fda.gov/media/83271/download
  9. Gram L, Dalgaard P. Fish spoilage bacteria-problems and solutions. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002;13:262-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00309-9
  10. Grimes DJ. Ecology of estuarine bacteria capable of causing human disease: a review. Estuaries. 1991;14:345-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352260
  11. Iwahori J, Yamamoto A, Suzuki H, Yamamoto T, Tsutsui T, Motoyama K, et al. Quantitative risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in finfish: a model of raw horse mackerel consumption in Japan. Risk Anal. 2010;30:1817-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01444.x
  12. Jung J, Lee J, Lee H, Lee S, Kim S, Ha J, et al. Quantitative microbial risk assessment for Campylobacter foodborne illness in raw beef offal consumption in South Korea. J Food Prot. 2017;80:609-18. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-159
  13. Jung SW. A foodborne outbreak of gastroenteritis caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus associated with cross-contamination from squid in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2018;40:e2018056. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2018056
  14. Kim HJ, Sujiwo J, Kim HJ, Jang A. Effects of dipping chicken breast meat inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes in lyophilized scallion, garlic, and kiwi extracts on its physicochemical quality. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019;39:418-29. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e37
  15. Kim JH, Kim MJ, Lee JS, Kim KH, Kim HJ, Heu MS, Kim JS. Development and characterization of sea squirt Halocynthia roretzi Sikhae. Kor J Fish Aquat Sci. 2013;46:27-36. https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2013.0027
  16. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [KDCA]. Korea health statistics 2016 [Internet]. Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys [KNHANES]. 2016 [cited 2019 Aug 20]. https://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/sub03/sub03_02_02.do
  17. KOSTAT [Statistics Korea]. Fishery product consumption (per person per year) [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 28]. http://www.index.go.kr/potal/stts/idxMain/selectPoSttsIdxSearch.do?idx_cd=1317&stts_cd=131701&freq=Y
  18. Lee H, Kim K, Choi KH, Yoon Y. Quantitative microbial risk assessment for Staphylococcus aureus in natural and processed cheese in Korea. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98:5931-45. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9611
  19. Lee H, Lee S, Kim S, Lee J, Ha J, Yoon Y. Quantitative microbial risk assessment for Clostridium perfringens in natural and processed cheeses. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016;29:1188-96. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.1007
  20. Lee J, Lee H, Lee S, Kim S, Ha J, Choi Y, Oh H,et al. Quantitative microbial risk assessment for Campylobacter jejuni in ground meat products in Korea. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019;39:565-75. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e39
  21. Lee Y, Choi Y, Lee S, Lee H, Kim S, Ha J, et al. Occurrence of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood distribution channels and their antibiotic resistance profiles in S. Korea. J Appl Microbiol. 2018;68:128-33.
  22. McLaughline JB, DePaola A, Bopp CA, Martinek KA, Napolilli NP, Allison CG, et al. Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis associated with Alaskan oysters. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1463-70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa051594
  23. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [MFDS]. Pathogenic microorganism profile [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Jan 10]. https://mfds.go.kr/brd/m_228/view.do?seq=15129&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&page=7
  24. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [MFDS]. Microbial risk profile [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Oct 20]. https://mfds.go.kr/brd/m_227/view.do?seq=25230&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&companycd=&company_nm=&page=13
  25. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [MFDS]. Foodborne illness statistics [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 10]. https://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/portal/healthyfoodlife/foodPoisoningStat.do?menu_no=3724&menu_grp=MENU_NEW02
  26. Newton A, Kendall M, Vugia DJ, Henao OL, Mahon BE. Increasing rates of vibriosis in the United States, 1996-2010: review of surveillance data from 2 systems. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:S391-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis243
  27. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2018-2027 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Apr 30]. http://www.fao.org/3/I9166EN/I9166EN.pdf
  28. Sanaa M, Coroller L, Cerf O. Risk assessment of listeriosis linked to the consumption of two soft cheeses made from raw milk: camembert of normandy and brie of Meaux. Risk Anal. 2004;24:389-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00440.x
  29. Sobrinho PS, Destro MT, Franco BD, Landgraf M. A quantitative risk assessment model for Vibrio parahaemolyticus in raw oysters in Sao Paulo state, Brazil. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;180:69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.04.008
  30. Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections associated with consumption of raw shellfish-three states, 2006. MMWR [Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report]. 2006 [cited 2020 Apr 26]. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm55d807a1.htm
  31. Vose DJ. Risk analysis in relation to the importation and exportation of animal products. Rev Sci Tech. 1997;16:17-29. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.16.1.997
  32. Wang T, Guo H, Zhang H, Ren F, Zhang M, Ge S, et al. Dynamics of bacterial communities of lamb meat packaged in air and vacuum pouch during chilled storage. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019;39:209-21. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e16
  33. Yamamoto A, Iwahori J, Vuddhakul V, Charernjiratragul W, Vose D, Osaka K. Quantitative modeling for risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in bloody clams in southern Thailand. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;124:70-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.02.021