Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

한국수산과학회 (The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk assessment of vibriosis by Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus in whip-arm octopus consumption in South Korea

  • Oh, Hyemin (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Yoon, Yohan (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Ha, Jimyeong (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Lee, Jeeyeon (Department of Food and Nutrition, Dong-Eui University) ;
  • Shin, Il-Shik (Department of Marine Food Science and Technology, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Mog (Department of Food Science and Technology/Institute of Food Science, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Park, Kwon-Sam (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Kim, Sejeong (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.30
  • 심사 : 2021.05.23
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study evaluated the risk of foodborne illness from highly pathogenic Vibrio spp. (Vibrio vulnificus and V. cholerae) by raw whip-arm octopus (Octopus minor) consumption. In total 180 samples of raw whip-arm octopus were collected from markets and examined for the prevalence of V. vulnificus and V. cholerae. Predictive models describing the kinetic behavior of Vibrio spp. in raw whip-arm octopus were developed, and the data on amounts and frequency of raw whip-arm octopus consumption were collected. Using the collected data, a risk assessment simulation was conducted to estimate the probability of foodborne illness raw whip-arm octopus consumption using @RISK. Initial contamination levels of Vibrio spp. in raw whip-arm octopus were -3.9 Log colony-forming unit/g, as estimated by beta distribution fitting. The developed predictive models were appropriate to describe Vibrio spp. in raw whip-arm octopus during distribution and storage with R2 values of 0.946-0.964. The consumption frequency and daily consumption amounts of raw whip-arm octopus per person were 0.47% and 57.65 g, respectively. The probability of foodborne illness from raw whip-arm octopus consumption was estimated to be 8.71 × 10-15 for V. vulnificus and 7.08 × 10-13 for V. cholerae. These results suggest that the risk of Vibrio spp. infection from raw whip-arm octopus consumption is low in South Korea.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by a grant (18162MFDS542) from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2019.

참고문헌

  1. Baker-Austin C, Oliver JD, Alam M, Ali A, Waldor MK, Qadri F, et al. Vibrio spp. infections. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:1-19.
  2. Baranyi J, Roberts TA. A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. Int J Food Microbiol. 1994; 23:277-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(94)90157-0
  3. Bross MH, Soch K, Morales R, Mitchell RB. Vibrio vulnificus infection: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76:539-44.
  4. Cash RA, Music SI, Libonati JP, Snyder MJ, Wenzel RP, Hornick RB. Response of man to infection with Vibrio cholerae. I. Clinical, serologic, and bacteriologic responses to a known inoculum. J Infect Dis. 1974;129:45-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/129.1.45
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO], World Health Organization [WHO]. Risk assessment tools for Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus associated with seafood. Rome: FAO; 2020.
  6. Food and Drug Administration of the United Nations [FDA]. BAM appendix 2: most probable number from serial dilutions 2020. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 6]. https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-appendix-2-most-probable-number-serial-dilutions
  7. Ha J, Lee J, Oh H, Kim HJ, Choi Y, Lee Y, et al. Description of kinetic behavior of pathogenic Escherichia coli in cooked pig trotters under dynamic storage conditions using mathematical equations. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2020;40:938-45. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e64
  8. Ha J, Lee J, Oh H, Shin IS, Kim YM, Park KS, et al. Microbial risk assessment of high risk Vibrio foodborne illness through raw oyster consumption. J Food Hyg Saf. 2020;35:37-44. https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2020.35.1.37
  9. Gauthier DT. Bacterial zoonoses of fishes: a review and appraisal of evidence for linkages between fish and human infections. Vet J. 2015;203:27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.10.028
  10. Jang YM, Park SK, Jeong HJ, Lee JW, Yoon YH, Park KS, et al. Quantitative cell count of Vibrio vulnificus cells based on MPN-PCR method. J Food Hyg Saf. 2018;33:412-5. https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2018.33.5.412
  11. Jones MK, Oliver JD. Vibrio vulnificus: disease and pathogenesis. Infect Immun. 2009;77:1723-33. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01046-08
  12. Kaspar CA, Tamplin ML. Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival of Vibrio vulnificus in seawater and shellfish. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:2425-9. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.59.8.2425-2429.1993
  13. Kim HJ, Ryu JO, Lee SY, Kim ES, Kim HY. Multiplex PCR for detection of the Vibrio genus and five pathogenic Vibrio species with primer sets designed using comparative genomics. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0577-3
  14. Kim JU, Park JH, Kang HS. Changing consumer intake of oyster, a twenties focus group study. J Fish Mar Sci Educ. 2019;31:1150-60. https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2019.8.31.4.1150
  15. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [KCDC]. Vibrio management guidelines. [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2020 Dec 20]. https://kdca.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20507020000&bid=0019&act=view&list_no=138508
  16. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [KCDC]. Epidemiological investigation of infectious diseases in Korea, Annual report 2016. [Internet] 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 5]. http://www.kdca.go.kr/npt/biz/npp/portal/nppPblctDtaView.do?pblctDtaSeAt=5&pblctDtaSn=23
  17. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention, [KCDC]. National health statistics in 2017. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 10]. https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/main.do
  18. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [KCDC]. Increasing incidence of patients with Vibrio sepsis 328 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 5]. https://kdca.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20501010000&bid=0015&act=view&list_no=364775
  19. Korea Rural Economic Institute [KREI]. Food balance sheet. Naju, Korea: KREI; 2014.
  20. Korean Statistical Information Service [KOSIS]. Fishery production trend survey 2018 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 2]. https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1EW0001
  21. Lyu ES. The standardized recipe and nutrient analysis of stirfried whip-arm octopus in Busan. J Korean Soc Food Cult. 2003;18:9-16.
  22. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [MFDS]. Numbers and toxicities of Vibrio vulnificus in various natural samples. 2003.
  23. Nair GB, Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya SK, Mukhopadhyay AK, Garg S, Bhattacharya MK, et al. Spread of Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal in India. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:1029-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/169.5.1029
  24. Nandi B, Nandy RK, Mukhopadhyay S, Nair GB, Shimada T, Ghose AC. Rapid method for species-specific identification of Vibrio cholerae using primers targeted to the gene of outer membrane protein OmpW. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4145-51. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.38.11.4145-4151.2000
  25. Ross T. Indices for performance evaluation of predictive models in food microbiology. J Appl Bacteriol. 1996;81:501-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb03539.x
  26. Sanaa M, Coroller L, Cerf O. Risk assessment of listeriosis linked to the consumption of two soft cheeses made from raw milk: Camembert of Normandy and Brie of Meaux. Risk Anal. 2004;24:389-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00440.x
  27. Tantillo GM, Fontanarosa M, Di Pinto A, Musti M. Updated perspectives on emerging Vibrios associated with human infections. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2004;39:117-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01568.x
  28. Tsai YH, Huang TJ, Hsu RWW, Weng YJ, Hsu WH, Huang KC, et al. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections and primary sepsis caused by Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio cholerae non-O1. J Trauma. 2009;66:899-905. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31816a9ed3
  29. Vose D. Quantitative risk analysis: a guide to Monte Carlo simulation modelling. Chichester, New York, NY: John & Wiley Sons; 1996.
  30. World Health Organization [WHO], Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. Risk assessment of Vibrio vulnificus in raw oysters: interpretative summary and technical report. Rome: FAO; 2005a.
  31. World Health Organization [WHO], Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. Risk assessment of choleragenic Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 in warm water shrimp in international trade: interpretative summary and technical report. Rome: FAO; 2005b.
  32. Yan L, Pei X, Zhang X, Guan W, Chui H, Jia H, et al. Occurrence of four pathogenic Vibrios in Chinese freshwater fish farms in 2016. Food Control. 2019;95:85-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.043