Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

  • 제51권2호
  • /
  • Pages.135-143
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2093-2278(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-2286(eISSN)
대한치주과학회 (Korean Academy of Periodontology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Long-term outcomes of adjacent and antagonistic teeth after implant restoration: a focus on patient-related factors

  • Park, Su-Yeon (Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Gun (Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Suh, Jo-Young (Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Du-Hyeong (Department of Prosthodontics, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Mok (Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2020.07.15
  • 심사 : 2020.11.13
  • 발행 : 2021.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: To investigate factors affecting the antagonistic and adjacent teeth in patients after implant restoration and prosthetic rehabilitation. Methods: In total, 160 patients who visited Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital for implant surgery, prosthesis placement, and supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) were included in this study. The average follow-up period was 88.06 months, and the maximum was 175 months. Patients' history of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and osteoporosis was investigated, and panoramic radiographs were taken after surgery and prosthetic treatment. During the follow-up period, extraction and prosthetic/endodontic treatments of the antagonistic and adjacent teeth were analyzed. The statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, the Fisher exact test, and multiple logistic regression analyses. Results: Treatment was performed on 29.4% of the studied antagonistic teeth with extraction performed in 20.0% and prosthetic treatment in 10.0%. Furthermore, 19.4% of the studied adjacent teeth underwent treatment, of which extraction was performed in 12.5% and prosthetic treatment in 7.5%. The treatment rate for adjacent teeth was 25.3% in smokers, which was higher than that of non-smokers (12.3%) (P=0.039). Patients who were non-adherent to SPT showed a significantly higher rate (19.6%) of antagonistic prosthetic treatment than did those who were adherent (5.5%) (P=0.006). Conclusions: Implant restoration can affect the adjacent and antagonistic teeth. Smoking, osteoporosis history, and absence of SPT may be risk factors for the treatment of the adjacent and antagonistic teeth.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Yamaga T, Ogawa H, Miyazaki H. Influence of occlusal deterioration considering prosthetics on subsequent all-cause mortality in a Japanese elderly independent population. Gerodontology 2019;36:163-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12394
  2. Marcus SE, Drury TF, Brown LJ, Zion GR. Tooth retention and tooth loss in the permanent dentition of adults: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75 2_suppl:684-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/002203459607502S08
  3. Millennium Research Group. U.S. markets for dental implants 2001: executive summary. Implant Dent 2001;10:234-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200110000-00005
  4. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:185-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01094.x
  5. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:26-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01067.x
  6. Urdaneta RA, Daher S, Lery J, Emanuel K, Chuang SK. Factors associated with crestal bone gain on single-tooth locking-taper implants: the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1063-78.
  7. Urdaneta RA, Leary J, Panetta KM, Chuang SK. The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:e179-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12087
  8. Misch CE, Misch-Dietsh F, Silc J, Barboza E, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Posterior implant single-tooth replacement and status of adjacent teeth during a 10-year period: a retrospective report. J Periodontol 2008;79:2378-82. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080188
  9. Yoshino K, Nishibori M, Fujiseki M, Ito K, Kuroda M, Matsukubo T. Loss of teeth in positions mesially adjacent to implant-supported fixed dentures: a retrospective clinical survey. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:158-60. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3969
  10. Delatola C, Adonogianaki E, Ioannidou E. Non-surgical and supportive periodontal therapy: predictors of compliance. J Clin Periodontol 2014;41:791-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12271
  11. Salinas TJ, Eckert SE. In patients requiring single-tooth replacement, what are the outcomes of implantas compared to tooth-supported restorations? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22 Suppl:71-95.
  12. Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:80-90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090203.x
  13. Busenlechner D, Furhauser R, Haas R, Watzek G, Mailath G, Pommer B. Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2014;44:102-8. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.3.102
  14. Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000 2017;73:7-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12185
  15. Chapman RJ. Principles of occlusion for implant prostheses: guidelines for position, timing, and force of occlusal contacts. Quintessence Int 1989;20:473-80.
  16. Akpinar I, Anil N, Parnas L. A natural tooth's stress distribution in occlusion with a dental implant. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:538-45. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00511.x
  17. Kim SY, Lee JK, Chang BS, Um HS. Effect of supportive periodontal therapy on the prevention of tooth loss in Korean adults. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2014;44:65-70. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.2.65
  18. Dockter KM, Williams KB, Bray KS, Cobb CM. Relationship between prereferral periodontal care and periodontal status at time of referral. J Periodontol 2006;77:1708-16. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060063
  19. Machtei EE, Oettinger-Barak O, Horwitz J. Axial relationship between dental implants and teeth/implants: a radiographic study. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:425-31. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00052
  20. Hekimoglu C, Anil N, Cehreli MC. Analysis of strain around endosseous dental implants opposing natural teeth or implants. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:441-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.023
  21. Kasai K, Takayama Y, Yokoyama A. Distribution of occlusal forces during occlusal adjustment of dental implant prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis considering the capacity for displacement of opposing teeth and implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:329-35.
  22. Kawamoto S, Nagaoka E. The effect of oestrogen deficiency on the alveolar bone resorption caused by traumatic occlusion. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:587-94. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00542.x
  23. Grossi SG, Genco RJ. Periodontal disease and diabetes mellitus: a two-way relationship. Ann Periodontol 1998;3:51-61. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.1998.3.1.51
  24. Imamura N, Nakata S, Nakasima A. Changes in periodontal pulsation in relation to increasing loads on rat molars and to blood pressure. Arch Oral Biol 2002;47:599-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(02)00041-9
  25. McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. The effect of blood flow on the material properties of bone. Ann Biomed Eng 1994;22:194-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390377
  26. Machuca G, Rosales I, Lacalle JR, Machuca C, Bullon P. Effect of cigarette smoking on periodontal status of healthy young adults. J Periodontol 2000;71:73-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.1.73
  27. de Araujo Nobre M, Malo P. Prevalence of periodontitis, dental caries, and peri-implant pathology and their relation with systemic status and smoking habits: Results of an open-cohort study with 22009 patients in a private rehabilitation center. J Dent 2017;67:36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.013
  28. Genco RJ, Genco FD. Common risk factors in the management of periodontal and associated systemic diseases: the dental setting and interprofessional collaboration. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2014;14 Suppl:4-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.03.003
  29. American Academy of Periodontology. Parameter on plaque-induced gingivitis. J Periodontol 2000;71 Suppl:851-2. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.5-S.851
  30. Cao X, Wang D, Zhou J, Yuan H, Chen Z. Relationship between dental caries and metabolic syndrome among 13 998 middle-aged urban Chinese. J Diabetes 2017;9:378-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12424
  31. Ritter AV, Preisser JS, Puranik CP, Chung Y, Bader JD, Shugars DA, et al. A predictive model for root caries incidence. Caries Res 2016;50:271-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445445
  32. Jiun IL, Siddik SN, Malik SN, Tin-Oo MM, Alam MK, Khan MM. Association between oral hygiene status and halitosis among smokers and nonsmokers. Oral Health Prev Dent 2015;13:395-405.
  33. Nishi N, Ogurii S, Onoda T, Nohara M, Inoue H, Okayama A. Knowledge of smoking-related risks and opinions on tobacco control by smoking status and education level in Japan. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 2005;52:962-70.
  34. Kim YT, Choi JK, Kim DH, Jeong SN, Lee JH. Association between health status and tooth loss in Korean adults: longitudinal results from the National Health Insurance Service-Health Examinee Cohort, 2002-2015. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2019;49:158-70. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2019.49.3.158

피인용 문헌

  1. Evaluation of Stresses on Implant, Bone, and Restorative Materials Caused by Different Opposing Arch Materials in Hybrid Prosthetic Restorations Using the All-on-4 Technique vol.14, pp.15, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154308