Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effectiveness of porcine-derived xenograft with enamel matrix derivative for periodontal regenerative treatment of intrabony defects associated with a fixed dental prosthesis: a 2-year follow-up retrospective study

  • Kim, Yeon-Tae (Daejeon Dental Care Center for Persons with Special Needs, Daejeon Dental Hospital, Institute of Wonkwang Dental Research, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jeong, Seong-Nyum (Department of Periodontology, Daejeon Dental Hospital, Institute of Wonkwang Dental Research, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Hong (Department of Periodontology, Daejeon Dental Hospital, Institute of Wonkwang Dental Research, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2020.09.29
  • Accepted : 2021.03.10
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Due to the difficulty of the hygienic care and sanitary management of abutment teeth and subpontic areas associated with fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), intrabony defects occur and accelerate due to the accumulation of plaque and calculus. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of regenerative periodontal surgery for intrabony defects associated with FDPs. Methods: The study inclusion criteria were met by 60 patients who underwent regenerative treatment between 2016 and 2018, involving a total of 82 intrabony defects associated with FDPs. Periodontal osseous lesions were classified as 1-, 2-, and 3-wall intrabony defects and were treated with an enamel matrix derivative in combination with bone graft material. The changes in clinical (pocket probing depth [PPD] and clinical attachment level [CAL]) and radiographic (defect depth and width) outcomes were measured at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months. Results: Six months after regenerative treatment, a significant reduction was observed in the PPD of 1-wall (P<0.001), 2-wall (P<0.001), and 3-wall (P<0.001) defects, as well as a significant reduction in the CAL of 2-wall (P<0.001) and 3-wall (P<0.001) intrabony defects. However, there was a significant increase in the CAL of 1-wall intrabony defects (P=0.003). Radiographically, a significant reduction in the depth of the 3-wall (P<0.001) defects and a significant reduction in the width of 2-wall (P=0.008) and 3-wall (P<0.001) defects were observed. The depth decreased in 1-wall defects; however, this change was not statistically significant (P=0.066). Conclusions: Within the limitations of the current study, regenerative treatment of 2- and 3-wall intrabony defects associated with FDPs improved clinical and radiological outcomes. Additional prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings and to assess long-term outcomes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Wonkwang University in 2021.

References

  1. Tan K, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, Chan ES. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:654-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x
  2. Hochman N, Yaffe A, Ehrlich J. Splinting: a retrospective 17-year follow-up study. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:600-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90154-3
  3. Fayyad MA, al-Rafee MA. Failure of dental bridges: III--effect of some technical factors. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:675-8.
  4. Fayyad MA, al-Rafee MA. Failure of dental bridges. II. Prevalence of failure and its relation to place of construction. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:438-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00875.x
  5. Knoernschild KL, Campbell SD. Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:492-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.110262
  6. Freilich MA, Niekrash CE, Katz RV, Simonsen RJ. Periodontal effects of fixed partial denture retainer margins: configuration and location. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:184-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90450-O
  7. Valderhaug J, Ellingsen JE, Jokstad A. Oral hygiene, periodontal conditions and carious lesions in patients treated with dental bridges. A 15-year clinical and radiographic follow-up study. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:482-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00395.x
  8. Muller HP. The effect of artificial crown margins at the gingival margin on the periodontal conditions in a group of periodontally supervised patients treated with fixed bridges. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:97-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb01440.x
  9. Valderhaug J, Birkeland JM. Periodontal conditions in patients 5 years following insertion of fixed prostheses. Pocket depth and loss of attachment. J Oral Rehabil 1976;3:237-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1976.tb00949.x
  10. Meyle J, Chapple I. Molecular aspects of the pathogenesis of periodontitis. Periodontol 2000 2015;69:7-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12104
  11. Papapanou PN, Tonetti MS. Diagnosis and epidemiology of periodontal osseous lesions. Periodontol 2000 2000;22:8-21. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2220102.x
  12. Reynolds MA, Kao RT, Camargo PM, Caton JG, Clem DS, Fiorellini JP, et al. Periodontal regeneration - intrabony defects: a consensus report from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol 2015;86:S105-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.140378
  13. Blumenthal NM, Alves ME, Al-Huwais S, Hofbauer AM, Koperski RD. Defect-determined regenerative options for treating periodontal intrabony defects in baboons. J Periodontol 2003;74:10-24. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.1.10
  14. Diaz-Faes L, Fernandez-Somoano A, Magan-Fernandez A, Mesa F. Efficacy of regenerative therapy in aggressive periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:1369-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03237-0
  15. Barbato L, Selvaggi F, Kalemaj Z, Buti J, Bendinelli E, Marca M, et al. Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) and non-surgical (MINST) treatments of periodontal intra-bony defect. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCT's. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:1125-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03229-0
  16. Lee JH, Park YS, Kim YT, Kim DH, Jeong SN. Assessment of early discomfort and wound healing outcomes after periodontal surgery with and without enamel matrix derivative: an observational retrospective case-control study. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:229-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02941-w
  17. Lee JH, Kim DH, Jeong SN. Adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivatives to porcine-derived xenograft for the treatment of one-wall intrabony defects: two-year longitudinal results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 2020;91:880-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0432
  18. Needleman I, Tucker R, Giedrys-Leeper E, Worthington H. A systematic review of guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infrabony defects. J Periodontal Res 2002;37:380-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0765.2002.01369.x
  19. Murphy KG, Gunsolley JC. Guided tissue regeneration for the treatment of periodontal intrabony and furcation defects. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:266-302. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.266
  20. Needleman IG, Worthington HV, Giedrys-Leeper E, Tucker RJ. Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD001724.
  21. Reynolds MA, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Branch-Mays GL, Gunsolley JC. The efficacy of bone replacement grafts in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:227-65. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.227
  22. Lee JH, Kim DH, Jeong SN. Comparative assessment of anterior maxillary alveolar ridge preservation with and without adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivative: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020;31:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13477
  23. Li W, Xiao L, Hu J. The use of enamel matrix derivative alone versus in combination with bone grafts to treat patients with periodontal intrabony defects: a meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:e46-56. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0327
  24. Matarasso M, Iorio-Siciliano V, Blasi A, Ramaglia L, Salvi GE, Sculean A. Enamel matrix derivative and bone grafts for periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:1581-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1491-7
  25. Nemoto Y, Kubota T, Nohno K, Nezu A, Morozumi T, Yoshie H. Clinical and CBCT evaluation of combined periodontal regenerative therapies using enamel matrix derivative and deproteinized bovine bone mineral with or without collagen membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018;38:373-81. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3288
  26. Kubota T, Nemoto Y, Nohno K, Nezu A, Morozumi T, Yoshie H. A comparable study of combinational regenerative therapies comprising enamel matrix derivative plus deproteinized bovine bone mineral with or without collagen membrane in periodontitis patients with intrabony defects. Open J Stomatol 2018;8:277-86. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2018.89026
  27. Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Weinlaender M, Nedic M, Aleksic Z, Kenney EB. A comparison between enamel matrix proteins used alone or in combination with bovine porous bone mineral in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans. J Periodontol 2000;71:1110-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.7.1110
  28. Zucchelli G, Amore C, Montebugnoli L, De Sanctis M. Enamel matrix proteins and bovine porous bone mineral in the treatment of intrabony defects: a comparative controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 2003;74:1725-35. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1725

Cited by

  1. Effects of noni on cellular viability and osteogenic differentiation of gingiva‑derived stem cells demonstrated by RNA sequencing and quantitative PCR vol.23, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10954
  2. Periodontal regenerative treatment with connective tissue grafts in deep intrabony defect and gingival recession in the maxillary canine: a case report with 3-year follow-up vol.45, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.45.04.202112.223