Research in Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Introduction of Fractions in Germany, Singapore, and South Korea Mathematics Textbooks

  • Received : 2021.05.26
  • Accepted : 2021.06.30
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This exploratory study focuses on analyzing three mathematics textbooks in Germany, Singapore and South Korea to reveal similarities and differences in their introductions of fraction concepts. Findings reveal that all three countries' textbooks introduce fraction concepts predominantly by using pictorial representations such as area models, but the introductions of multiple fraction constructs vary. The Singaporean and South Korean textbooks predominantly used a part-whole construct to introduce fractional concepts while the German textbook introduced various constructs sequentially in the first pages using several scenarios from different real-life situations. The findings were represented using visual representations, which we called textbook signatures. The textbook signatures provided configurations of the textbook features across the three countries. At the end of paper, we share insights and limitations about the use of textbook signatures in the research on textbook analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, G. & Quinn, R. (2006). Algebra students' difficulty with fractions: An error analysis. AMT 62(4), 28-40.
  2. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
  3. Chang, B. L., Cromley, J. G., & Tran, N. (2016). Coordinating multiple representations in a reform calculus textbook. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(8), 1475 - 1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9652-3
  4. Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H.-Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903460070
  5. Choy, B. H., Lee, M. Y., & Mizzi, A. (2015). Textbook signatures: An exploratory study of the notion of gradient in Germany, Singapore and South Korea. In Beswick, K., Muir, T., & Wells, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2, pp. 201-208. Hobart, Australia: PME.
  6. Choy, B. H., Lee, M. Y., & Mizzi, A. (2020). Insights into the teaching of gradient from an exploratory study of mathematics textbooks from Germany, Singapore, and South Korea. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8273
  7. Clarke, D. M., Roche, A., & Mitchell, A. (2008). Ten practical tips for making fractions come alive and make sense. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(7), 373-380.
  8. Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & del Mas, R. C. (2002) Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricular with the effects of using the Rational Number Project Curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 111-144. https://doi.org/10.2307/749646
  9. Cramer, K., & Whitney, S. (2010). Learning rational number concepts and skills in elementary classrooms. In D. V. Lambdin & F. K. Lester (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics: Translating research to the elementary classroom (pp. 15-22). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  10. Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM, 45(5), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
  11. Getenet, S., & Callingham, R. (2019). Teaching interrelated concepts of fraction for understanding and teacher's pedagogical content knowledge. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33, 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00275-0
  12. Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2015). Relationships between students' fractional knowledge and equation writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 196-243. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.2.0196
  13. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the "voice" of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344-369.
  14. Huntley, M. A. (2008). A framework for analyzing differences across mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 10(2), 10-17.
  15. Kieren, T. E. (1980). The rational number construct: Its elements and mechanisms. In T. E. Kieren (Ed.), Recent research on number learning (pp. 125-149). Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.
  16. Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning. In F. K. J. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629-667). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  17. Lamon, S. J. (2012). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  18. Leong, Y. H., & Kaur, B. (2019). The enacted school mathematics curriculum. In T. L. Toh, B. Kaur, & E. G. Tay (Eds.), Mathematics education in Singapore (pp. 55-65). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3573-0_4
  19. Leung, F. K. S. (2014). What can and should we learn from international studies of mathematics achievement? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 579-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0109-0
  20. Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.2307/749754
  21. Lee, M. Y., & Hackenberg, A. J. (2014). Relationships between fractional knowledge and algebraic reasoning: The case of Willa. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 975-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9442-8
  22. Lee, J., & Lee, M. Y. (2020). Pre-service teachers' exploration of model breaking points. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 549-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09974-3
  23. Lee, M. Y., & Lee, J. (2021). Pre-service teachers' selection, interpretation, and sequence of fraction examples. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(3), 539-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10062-0
  24. Lee, J., & Lee, M. Y. (accepted). How elementary pre-service teachers use three fraction models: Their perceptions and difficulties. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.
  25. Ministry of Education. (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education of Korea Government.
  26. Ministry of Education. (2015). Suhak 3-1. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education.
  27. Ministry of Education. (2015). Suhak 3-2. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education.
  28. Ministry of Education-Singapore. (2012). Primary mathematics teaching and learning syllabus. Singapore: Curriculum Planning and Development Division.
  29. Mizzi, A., Choy, B. H., & Lee, M. Y. (2016). Textbook signatures: An exploratory study of the notion of fractions in Germany, Singapore, and South Korea. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-13). Hamburg, Germany.
  30. National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Report of the task group on conceptual skills and knowledge. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  31. Nicol, C. C., & Crespo, S. M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-5423-y
  32. O'Keeffe, L., & O'Donoghue, J. (2015). A role for language analysis in mathematics textbook analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3), 605-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9463-3
  33. Pepin, B., Haggarty, L., & Keynes, M. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Away to understand teaching and learning cultures. ZDM, 33(5), 158-175.
  34. Petit, M. M., Laird, R., & Marsden, E. (2010). Informing practice: They "get" fractions as pies; now what? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 16(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.16.1.0005
  35. Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In T. S. E. Wood, & D. V. E. Tirosh (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 1-35): Sense Publishers.
  36. Simon, M. A., Placa, N., Avitzur, A., & Kara, M. (2018). Promoting a concept of fraction-as-measure: A study of the Learning Through Activity research program. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52, 122-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.03.004
  37. Smith, J. P. (2002). The development of students' knowledge of fractions and ratios. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp. 3 - 17). Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  38. Son, J. W., & Diletti, J. (2017). What can we learn from textbook analysis? In J.-W. Son, T. Watanabe, & J.-J. Lo (Eds.), What matters? Research trends in international comparative studies in mathematics education (pp. 3-32). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51187-01
  39. Stafylidou, S., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of students' understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 503-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.015
  40. Stigler, J. W., Fuson, K. C., Ham, M., & Kim, M. S. (1986). An analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in American and Soviet elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 3(3), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0303_1
  41. Usiskin, Z. (2013). Studying textbooks in an information age: A United States perspective. ZDM, 45(5), 713-723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0514-6
  42. Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the Book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0844-0
  43. van de Walle, J., Karp, K. S., & Bam-Williams, J. M. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  44. Vig, R., Murray, E., & Star, J. R. (2014). Model breaking points conceptualized. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9254-6
  45. Wang, Y., Barmby, P., & Bolden, D. (2015). Understanding linear function: Acomparison of selected textbooks from England and Shanghai. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9674-x
  46. Wong, K. Y. (2015). Effective mathematics lessons through an eclectic Singapore approach. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.