DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Graduates Seeking Jobs

  • El-Boghdadi, Hatem M. (Islamic University of Madinah) ;
  • Noor, Fazal (Islamic University of Madinah) ;
  • Mahmoud, Mostafa (Islamic University of Madinah)
  • Received : 2021.01.05
  • Published : 2021.01.30

Abstract

The appearance of COVID-19 virus has affected many aspects of our life. These include and not limited to social, financial and economic changes. One of the most important impacts is the economic effects. Many countries have taken actions to continue the teaching process through online teaching platforms. The students are expected to graduate during the next few semesters with certificates that include some online-completed courses and their graduation certificates are called mixed certificates. This paper considers graduation mixed certificates with some online courses and its impact on graduates seeking jobs. First, we study how well the mixed certificates are accepted by job market. In other words, how different companies, organizations and even governmental entities would accept such certificates when hiring. We study the perception of job market for such certificates for different learning fields. Secondly, we study how well the online courses are accepted by the students keeping in mind that these students are used to traditional face to face teaching. Finally, we paper our results and recommendations according to the collected data from the surveys. Some of the results show that about 60% of companies don't have policies to encourage hiring graduates with mixed certificates. Also, colleges are almost divided evenly between preferring face to face and preferring online teaching.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work is done under the grant received (6/41) by Deanship of research at Islamic University of Madinah (IUM) for research that studies the economic effect of COvid-19 pandemic. We also give special thanks to the administration of IUM for their support in every aspect.

References

  1. Wicks, M. 2010. A national primer on K-12 online learning. Version 2. http://www.inacol.org/research/docs/iNCL_NationalPrimerv22010-web.pdf.
  2. Olster, S. 2010, July 27. Summer school goes online. Fortune. http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/010/07/27/summer-school-goes-online.
  3. Krafcik, M. 2010. Monongalia alters summer school program. http://yourwvabc.com/story.cfm?func=viewstoryandstoryid=73739.
  4. Kearsley, G., and B. Shneiderman. 1998. Engagement theory: A framework for technologybased teaching and learning. Educational Technology 38 (5): 20-23.
  5. Horn, M., and H. Staker. 2011. The rise of K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute. http://www.innosightinstitute.org/innosight/wpcontent/uploads/2011/01/The-Rise-ofK-12-Blended-Learning.pdf.
  6. service of learning (pp. 154-178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sloan, J., and K. Mackey. 2009. VOISE Academy: Pioneering a blended-learning model in a Chicago public high school. Innosight Institute. http://www.innosightinstitute.org.
  7. Cavanaugh, C. 2008. Augmented reality gaming in education: Authentic and engaged blended learning. In R. Ferdig (ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
  8. Graham, C. R., S. Allen, and D. Ure. 2005. Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In M. Khosrow-Pour (ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (pp. 253-259). Hershey, PA: Idea Group
  9. Sloan, J., and K. Mackey. 2009. VOISE Academy: Pioneering a blended-learning model in a Chicago public high school. Innosight Institute. http://www.innosightinstitute.org.
  10. Marianne Bakia, Linda Shear, Yukie Toyama, Austin Lasseter, Understanding the implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity, Report, U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology, 2013.
  11. Clark, R. A., & Jones, D. (2001). A comparison of traditional and online formats in a public speaking course. Communication Education 50(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520109379238
  12. Leung, P. W. (2007). Introducing e-learning in a traditional Chinese context. In M. Keppel (Ed.), Instructional design: Case studies in communities of practice: InfoSci-Journals (pp. 275-297).
  13. Ho, J., & Burns, M. (2010, August). Distance education pilots for Indonesia: An evaluation of pilot program 1-Decentralized Basic Education 2 (DBE 2). Evaluation report submitted to the United States Agency for International Development. Washington, DC: Education Development Center, Inc.
  14. Jung, I., (2002, August). Issues and challenges of providing online in-service teacher training: Korea's experience [PDF document]. In International Review of Open and Distance Learning. Retrieved from from http:// www.irrodl.org/content/v2.1/jung.pdf
  15. Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London, UK, and New York, NY: Routledge
  16. Latchem, C., & Jung, I. (2010). Distance and blended learning in Asia. New York, NY: Routledge.
  17. Mary Burns, 2011, Distance Education for Teacher Training: Modes, Models, and Methods, Education Development Center, Inc. Washington, DC.
  18. Akwasi Arko-Achemfuor, Student support gaps in an open distance learning context, Issues in Educational Research, 27(4), 2017.
  19. Council for Higher Education (2016). Higher Education data: Participation. http://www.che.ac.za/focus_areas/higher_education_data/2013/participation.
  20. Jenifer Vanek, Destiny Simpson, Jerome Johnston, and Leslie I. Petty, Sixth Edition, (2018), IDEAL Distance Education and Blended Learning Handbook.