International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security (국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Methods of Regulating Migration Processes in EU Countries

  • Received : 2021.03.05
  • Published : 2021.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Modern methods of regulating migration processes in EU states include a wide variety of adapted, transformed under the sway of globalization tools in order to influence the movement of human capital within the European space. The main purpose of the regulatory policy on migration flows is the redistribution of professionally competent professionals between different spheres of life. Herewith, the determining factor in the effectiveness of such distribution is a rational combination of stimulating and disincentive levers of influence on the movement of citizens of different EU countries and taking into account the motives of such mobility. Modernization of migration management approaches can be a major economic, social, political and cultural progress of European countries. The purpose of the research is to conduct a detailed analysis of existing practices of migration flow management, in particular their stimulation or containment, and to outline key migration trends formed under the influence of multicomponent approaches to migration regulation, transformation of regulatory legislation and changing priorities of modern society. The research methods: statistical-analytical method; ARIS method; method of tabular, graphical and analytical modeling; comparative analysis; systematization, generalization. Results. Current pan-European methods of regulating migration processes are insufficiently adapted to the multinational socialeconomic space; consequently, there are some disparities in the distribution of migrants between EU countries, although the overall dynamics of migration is positive. Fluctuations in the population of European countries during 2000-2019 and trends in the transformation of social-economic space confirm the insufficient level of influence of current methods of regulating migration flows. Along with this, the presence of a characteristic asymmetry in the distribution of migrants requires a greater focus on the modernization of regulatory instruments, in particular, the regulatory mechanism for managing migration processes. As a result of the conducted study, further prospects for the implementation of alternative methods of regulating migration processes in EU states have been outlined; the current and projected limits for increasing the level of observance of migrants' rights at the European level have been clarified through the adoption of appropriate regulatory acts; effective solutions for intensifying the influx of high-quality labor resources from different countries to EU have been identified. The research results can be used to study methods of regulating migration processes in the countries in the global dimension.

Keywords

References

  1. International Organization for Migration (IOM) (2020) World Migration Report 2020. Geneva: International Organization for Migration, 477 p.
  2. United Nations (2019) International Migration 2019 Report. New York: published by United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 71 p.
  3. Bugra, A., Agartan, K. (2007). Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 267 p.
  4. Burawoy, M. (2015). Facing an Unequal World. Current Sociology, 63 (1), pp. 5-34 https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114564091
  5. Castillejo, C. (2017). The EU Migration Partnership Framework: time for a rethink?, Discussion Paper, No. 28/2017, Deutsches Institut fur Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Bonn. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/199518.
  6. Castles, S. (2018a). International migration at the beginning of the twenty-first century: global trends and issues. International Social Science Journal, 68(227-228), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12185
  7. United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) (1997) The State of the World's Refugees 1997-98: A Humanitarian Agenda. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. White A., Grabowska I., Kaczmarczyk P. & Slany K. (2018). The Impact of Migration on Poland: EU Mobility and Social Change. London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787350687
  9. Vertovec, S. (2018). The public understanding of migration: a variety of factors influence how people conceive of the issue. Max Planck Society Newsroom. https://www.mpg.de/12570028/the-public-understanding-ofmigration.
  10. Bouoiyour J., Miftah A., Selmi R. The economic impact of migrants and refugees on Europe. Med Brief , 24.
  11. Kirkegaard J.F. (2016) The Economic Challenges of Migration in Europe. Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE).https://www.piie.com/commentary/speeches-papers/economic-challenges-migration-europe
  12. Luyten K., Gonzalez Diaz S. (2019) Legal migration to the EU. European Parliamentary Research Service, 12 p. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/635559/EPRS_BRI(2019)635559_EN.pdf.
  13. European Commission (2020) Annual Report on Migration and Asylum 2019. European Migration Network. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, p. 78.
  14. Linden M., Reis E., Bacci M., Castles S., Delgado-Wise R., Kanger L. (2018) Social trends and new geographies. In: IPSP, International Panel on Social Progress (ed.) Rethinking society for the 21st century. Report of The International Panel On Social Progress, 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 9-40.
  15. Keating M. (2020) Rescaling Europe, rebounding territory: A political approach. Regional & Federal Studies, pp. 1-20 https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1791095.
  16. Zlobina A., Basabe N., Paez D., & Furnham A. (2006). Sociocultural adjustment of immigrants: Universal and group-specific predictors. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(2), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.005.
  17. Roberts C. (2010) Language Socialization in the Workplace. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000127
  18. Lafleur J.-M., Stanek M. (eds.), (2017). South-North Migration of EU Citizens in Times of Crisis, IMISCOE Research Series, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39763-4_10.
  19. Drinkwater S. (2010) Immigration and the Economy. National Institute Economic Review, 213 (1), R1-R4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027950110380319
  20. Haniya S., Tzirides A.-O., Georgiadou K., Montebello M., Kalantzis M, Cope B. (2019) Assessment Innovation in Higher Education by Integrating Learning Analytics. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, Vol. 6, No. 1, 53-57. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.6.1.53-57
  21. International Organization for Migration (IOM) (2019) Migration governance indicators a global perspective. Geneva: International Organization for Migration, 45 p.
  22. EC (European Commission). (2017a). Partnership framework on migration one year on: Lessons learned, challenges and way forward. Brussels: Author.
  23. Steinmo S. (2008) Historical institutionalism. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118-138 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511801938.008.
  24. Suddaby R. and Greenwood R. (2011) Methodological Issues in Researching Institutional Change. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, Paperback Edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd., pp. 176-195.
  25. Blyth M., Helgadottir O., Kring W. (2016) Ideas and Historical Institutionalism. Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford University Press: New York and London, pp. 584-843. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.001.0001.
  26. Castles, S. (2017) Migration policies are problematic - because they are about migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(9), 1538-1543. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1308532
  27. W. (Ed.), Amran G., Belanger A., Conte A., Gailey N., Ghio D., Grapsa E., Jensen K., Loichinger E., Marois G., Muttarak R., Potancokova M., Sabourin P., Stonawski M. (2019) Demographic Scenarios for the EU - Migration, Population and Education, Publications Office, Luxembourg, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2760/590301, JRC116398.
  28. Neal S., Bennett K., Cochrane A., Mohan G. (2018) Lived Experiences of Multiculture: The New Social and Spatial Relations of Diversity. Routledge Research in Race and Ethnicity. Abingdon: Routledge, 182 p.
  29. Vertovec, S. (2017). Talking around super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1406128.
  30. Besharov D. J., Lopez M. H. (2016) Adjusting to a World in Motion: Trends in Global Migration and Migration Policy. Oxford University Press, 440 p.
  31. Seilonen J. (2016) Fortress Europe - a brief history of the European migration and asylum policy: A historical institutionalist analysis of the migration and asylum policy, and the impacts of the current migration crisis. Helsinki: Helsingfors universitet, 112 p.