한국중재학회지:중재연구 (Journal of Arbitration Studies)

한국중재학회 (The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

ICSID 중재판정의 취소를 통한 불복

Challenge through Annulment of ICSID Arbitral Awards

  • 김용일 (한국교통대학교 국제통상전공) ;
  • 오현석 (대구대학교 무역학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.21
  • 심사 : 2021.03.01
  • 발행 : 2021.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This article examines the Challenge through Annulment of ICSID Arbitral Awards. Either party may request annulment of the award by applying in writing addressed to the ICSID Secretary-General on one or more of the grounds under Article 52 of the ICSID Convention. The annulment proceedings must focus on the award itself. Because committees have no inherent supremacy over the arbitral tribunal, they should not review the tribunal's findings on evidence, damage, interest, and cost findings. Otherwise, the parties would have, in effect, two opportunities, and that will almost certainly weaken the reliability of the entire ICSID system. In short, because of the limited scope of review under ICSID annulment and because annulment is not an opportunity for the parties to re-try the case, committees should not allow new arguments or new evidence. Since an annulment committee is not a court of appeals, it cannot create a new res judicata. Committees can only decide not to annul an award, thus confirming the existing res judicata or annul the award, in which case the affected decision ceases to be res judicata. An obvious annulment decision stipulating which particular findings of the award remain res judicata should prevent any uncertainty in resubmission proceedings.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 산학협동재단 지원을 받아 수행하였음.

참고문헌

  1. 강병근, 「ICSID 중재제도 연구」, 법무부, 2006.
  2. 김상찬, "ICSID 중재판정 취소제도", 「중재연구」, 제25권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2015.
  3. 김용일, "ICSID 상소제도의 도입 필요성", 「중재연구」, 제29권 제4호, 한국중재학회, 2019.
  4. 김용일, "ICSID 중재판정의 재심제도에 관한 연구", 「국제상학」, 제28권 제3호, 한국국제상학회, 2013.
  5. 김용일, "ICSID 중재판정의 '집행정지'에 관한 고찰", 「무역상무연구」, 제68권, 한국무역상무학회, 2015.
  6. 박건도, "ICSID 협약상 취소제도의 성격 및 취소사유에 관한 소고: 명백한 월권 및 이유 미기재를 중심으로", 「법과 정책연구」, 제10집 제3호, 한국법정책학회, 2010.
  7. 오원석 외, "ICSID 중재의 취소제도에 관한 제 고찰", 「중재연구」, 제24권 제4호, 한국중재학회, 2014.
  8. 이기옥, "ICSID 중재판정의 취소와 집행에 관한 연구", 박사학위논문, 성균관대학교, 2015.
  9. 하현수, "ICSID 중재의 임시적 처분 구속력과 미준수 효과에 관한 연구", 「중재연구」, 제30권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2020.
  10. 이종현, "문재인 대통령, 5조원대 론스타 ISDS 소송 직접 챙겼다", 「조선비즈」, 2020.11.11.자, 접속일 2020.12.11. https://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2020/11/10.
  11. Bishop, R. D. and Marchili, S. M., Annulment under the ICSID Convention, Oxford, 2012.
  12. Curtis, C. T., "International Investment Disputes-Res Judicate Effect Partially Annulment ICSID Award-Amco Asia Corp v Republic of Indonesia," 83 American Law Journal of International Law 106, 1989.
  13. Giannakopoulos, C., "Reconceptualizing 'Failure to State Reasons' as a Ground for Annulment under Article 52 (1)(e) of the ICSID Convention," Journal of International Dispute Settlement 8(1), 2017.
  14. Giardina, A., 'ICSID; A Self-Contained Non-National Review System' in R B Lillich and C N Brower (eds), International Arbitration in the 21st Century, New York: Transnational Publishers, 1994.
  15. ICSID, The ICSID Caseload - Statistics, 2020.
  16. ICSID, Background Paper on Annulment for the Administrative Council of ICSID, Aug. 10, 2012.
  17. Lamm, C. B., "Jurisdiction of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes," ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal (2), Fall 1991.
  18. Mayer, P., 'To What Extent Can an Ad hoc Committee Review the Factual Finding of an Arbitral Tribunal?' in E Gaillard and Y Banifatemi (eds), Annulment of ICSID Awards, New York: Juris Publishing, 2004.
  19. Paulsson, J., "ICSID's Achievements and Prospects," ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal 6(2), Fall 1991.
  20. Reed, L. et al., Guide to ICSID Arbitration, Wolters Kluwer, 2011.
  21. Reisman, W. M., 'Reflection on the Control Mechanism of the ICSID System' in E. G. Aillard(ed), The Review of International Arbitral Awards, Jurist and International Arbitration Institute, 2010.
  22. Schreuer, C. H. et al., The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  23. Schreuer, C. H., "From ICSID Annulment to Appeal-Half Way Down the Slippery Slope," The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 10, 2011.
  24. Schwartz, E., 'Finality at What Cost? The Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee in Wena Hotels v Egypt' in E Gaillard and Y Banifatemi(eds), Annulment of ICSID Awards, New York: Juris Publishing, 2004.
  25. Tanzi, A. M., "On judicial autonomy and the autonomy of the parties in international adjudication, with special regard to investment arbitration and ICSID annulment proceedings," Leiden Journal of International Law 33(1), 2020.
  26. Thomas, J. C. and Dhillon, H. K., "The Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration: The ICSID Convention, Investment Treaties and the Review of Arbitration Awards," ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal 32(3), Fall 2017.
  27. Trooboff, P. D., 'To What Extent May an Ad hoc Committee Review the Factual Finding of an Arbitral Tribunal Based on a Procedural Error?' in E Gaillard and Y Banifatemi (eds), Annulment of ICSID Awards, New York: Juris Publishing, 2004.