Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of vowel duration on the perceived naturalness of English monosyllabic words ending in a stop: Some preliminary findings

  • Ko, Eon-Suk (Department of English Language and Literature, Chosun University)
  • Received : 2021.06.08
  • Accepted : 2021.06.18
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Preliminary findings are reported from five experiments testing the perceived naturalness of word tokens whose vowel durations are altered. The stimuli were minimal pairs of English words ending in a voiced/voiceless plosive. Results show an asymmetric effect of shortening and lengthening of the vowel on the perceived naturalness of the word. Incremental shortening of vowel duration initially shows a stable degree of perceived naturalness but rapidly deteriorates beyond a certain point. On the contrary, only a small degree of lengthening of the vowel made the perceived naturalness of the word quickly decay, but there was a floor effect such that the perceived degree of naturalness does not lower beyond a certain level. Further, the tokens with the original vowel duration were not always scored higher than the stimuli with a small degree of shortening. Future studies should address the issue of speaking rate and the ratio between the vowel and the stop closure duration to better understand the phenomenon. The issue investigated here has implications on the role of prototypical exemplars in the perception of phonotactic naturalness.

Keywords

References

  1. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. J. M. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341-345.
  2. Denes, P. (1955). Effect of duration on the perception of voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 761-764. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908020
  3. Gibson, E., Piantadosi, S., & Fedorenko, K. (2011). Using mechanical turk to obtain and analyze English acceptability judgments. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(8), 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00295.x
  4. Hogan, J. T., & Rozsypal, A. J. (1980). Evaluation of vowel duration as a cue for the voicing distinction in the following word-final consonant. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67(5), 1764-1771. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.384304
  5. House, A. S., & Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(1), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906982
  6. Ko, E.-S., Soderstrom, M. & Morgan, J. (2009) Development of perceptual sensitivity to extrinsic vowel duration in infants learning American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126.5, EL134-139. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3239465
  7. Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50(2), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212211
  8. Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1985). Contextual effects on vowel duration, closure duration, and the consonant/vowel ratio in speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78(6), 1949-1957. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392651
  9. Massaro, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21(3), 398-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90014-5
  10. Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  11. Oden, G. C., & Massaro, D. W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review, 85(3), 172-191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.172
  12. Raphael, L. J. (1972). Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51(4B), 1296-1303. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912974
  13. R Core Team (2019). R: R foundation for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
  14. Samuel, A. G. (1982). Phonetic prototypes. Perception & Psychophysics, 31(4), 307-314. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202653
  15. Utman, J. A. (1998). Effects of local speaking rate context on the perception of voice-onset time in initial stop consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(3), 1640-1653. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.421297