DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Forage Sources in Total Mixed Ration (TMR) on in vitro Rumen Fermentation of Goat

다양한 조사료를 이용해 제조한 TMR이 흑염소 반추위 in vitro 발효성상에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Jinwook (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Soo (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Chan-Lan (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Bong-Hwan (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hoon (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Kyo (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Do (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Kwan-Woo (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Ryu, Chae Hwa (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • Received : 2021.03.30
  • Accepted : 2021.06.16
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

In this study, the effect of forage sources in the total mixed ration (TMR) on in vitro goat rumen fermentation was investigated. Rice straw (RS), Italian ryegrass (IRG), timothy (TIM), and alfalfa (ALF) were used as forage sources. Each forage source was mixed with a commercial goat concentrate diet in the ratio of 1:1. Total 4 TMR were prepared. Rumen simulated in vitro fermentation using goat rumen fluid collected from the slaughterhouse was conducted until 72th. For fermentation parameters, gas production (GP), volatile fatty acids (VFAs), and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) were examined. All assays were performed at 24th, 48th, and 72th h of incubation individually. Contents of crude protein and non-fibrous carbohydrate were greater in the order of RS < IRG < TIM < ALF. Significant treatment effects were found in valerate and NH3-N at 24th h of incubation (p<0.05). ALF showed the greatest contents of them and RS was the lowest. At 48th incubation, a significant effect was detected at GP (p<0.05) and RS was greater than others. However, GP of RS was lower than others at 72th. Significant effects on Total VFA, butyrate, and valerate productions were found at 72th h of incubation (p<0.05). ALF showed the greatest production. Methane production from all treatments was not significantly different for each incubation time (p>0.05). The present study provided primary information on how goat rumen fermentation responds to different nutrient contents and forage sources of TMR. And the information could be used for the design or optimizing economical diet formulation for goats.

본 연구는 TMR에 사용된 조사료원의 종류가 염소 반추위 발효 특성에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 시험에 사용된 조사료원은 볏짚(RS), 이탈리안 라이그라스(IRG), 티모시(TIM) 및 알팔파(ALF)을 이용하여 시험용 TMR을 제조하였다. In vitro 반추위 발효 실험은 24, 48 및 72시간 동안 진행하였고, 각 시간별 발효성상(발효가스, 휘발성지방산, 암모니아태 질소)을 조사하였다. 시험사료의 조단백질 및 비섬유성 탄수화물 함량은 RS, IRG, TIM 그리고 ALF 순으로 높았다. 발효 24시간에서는 valerate와 암모니아태 질소에서 유의적인 차이가 관찰되었고, ALF 시험구가 가장 높았고, RS가 가장 낮았다. 발효 48시간에서는 총 가스 발생량에서 유의적 차이가 관찰되었고(p<0.05), RS 시험구에서 가장 높은 가스발생량이 관찰되었다. 그러나 발효 72시간대에서는 RS 시험구에서 유의적으로 가장 낮은 가스발생량이 관찰되었다. 휘발성 지방산의 유의적인 차이는 발효 72시간에 관찰되었다. ALF 시험구에서 유의적으로 높은 총 휘발성지방산, butyrate 및 valerate 생성량이 관찰되었다(p<0.05). 메탄가스 발생량은 모든 발효시간동안 처리구간 유의적 차이가 관찰되지 않았다(p>0.05). 본 연구결과 염소에서 사료 내 조사료의 종류가 발효성상 변화에 영향을 줄 수 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 이는 염소에서 양질조사료의 활용성을 향상시키기 위한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다. 그러나 실제 가축에서의 생산성 변화 등의 효과를 확인하기 위하여 in vivo 상에서 추가적인 연구가 필요하다고 생각된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 농촌진흥청 연구사업(과제명 : 염소 장내발효 메탄 배출량에 영향을 미치는 메탄생성균 다양성 조사. 과제번호 : PJ013607)의 지원에 의해 이루어진 것임. 본 연구는 2021년도 농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 전문연구원 과정 지원 사업 및 2021년도 농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 학·연협동연구 석·박사학위과정 운영사업에 의해 이루어진 것임

References

  1. Agnihotri, M.K., Rajkumar, V. and Dutta, T.K. 2006. Effect of feeding complete rations with variable protein and energy levels prepared using by-products of pulses and oilseeds on carcass characteristics, meat and meat ball quality of goats. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 19:1437-1449. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1437
  2. AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Gaitherburg, MD.
  3. Benchaar, C., Pomar, C. and Chiquette, J. 2001. Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: A modelling approach. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 81:563-574. https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-119
  4. Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G., Yanez-Ruiz, D.R., Martin-Garcia, A.I. and Molina-Alcaide, E. 2009. Effects of forage: Concentrate ratio and forage type on apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and microbial growth in goats. Journal of Animal Science. 87:622-631. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1142
  5. Chaney, A.L. and Marbach, E.P. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry. 8:130-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130
  6. Choi, Y.J., Choi, N.J., Park, S.H., Song, J.Y., Um, J.S., Ko, J.Y. and Ha, J.K. 2002. Effects of Passtein® Supplements on protein degradability, ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestibility. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 44(5):549-560. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2002.44.5.549
  7. Durmic, Z., Ramirez-Restrepo, C.A., Gardiner, C., O'Neill, C.J., Hussein, E. and Vercoe, P.E. 2017. Differences in the nutrient concentrations, in vitro methanogenic potential and other fermentative traits of tropical grasses and legumes for beef production systems in northern Australia. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 97:4075-4086. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8274
  8. Eom, J.S., Lee, S.J., Lee, Y.K. and Lee, S.S. 2018. Comparison of volatile fatty acids, monosaccharide analysis and metabolic profiling in rumen fluid according to feeding methods. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 19:814-824. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.12.814
  9. Erwin, E.S., Marco, G.J. and Emery, E.M. 1961. Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science. 44:1768-1771. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(61)89956-6
  10. Getachew, G., Blummel, M., Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K. 1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 72(3):261-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00189-2
  11. Getachew, G., Robinson, P.H., DePeters, E.J. and Taylor, S.J. 2004. Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 111:57-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00217-7
  12. Giger-Reverdin, S., Domange, C., Broudiscou, L.P., Sauvant, D. and Berthelot, V. 2020. Rumen function in goats, an example of adaptive capacity. Journal of Dairy Research. 87:45-51. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022029920000060
  13. Goetsch, A.L., Merkel, R.C. and Gipson, T.A. 2011. Factors affecting goat meat production and quality. Small Ruminant Research. 101:173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.09.037
  14. Ha, J.J., Kim, B.K., Jung, D.J., Yi, J.K., Kim, D.H., Lee, J.Y. and Oh, D.Y. 2018. Effects of different roughage type on disappearance rates of nutrients in the Rumen and CH4 emission in Hanwoo cows. The Korean Data and Information Science Society. 29(3):621-632. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2018.29.3.621
  15. Hiltner, P. and Dehority, B.A. 1983. Effect of soluble carbohydrates on digestion of cellulose by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 46:642-648. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.46.3.642-648.1983
  16. Hofmann, R.R. 1985. Digestive physiology of the deer-their morphophysiological specialisation and adaptation. Biology of deer production. Proceedings of an International Conference Held at Dunedin, New Zealand. pp. 393-407.
  17. Hoover, W. 1986. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion. Journal of Dairy Science. 69(10):2755-2766. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(86)80724-x
  18. Hwangbo, S., Jo, I.H., Song, K.J. and Lee, S.H. 2007. Effects of dietary probiotics on feed intakes, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention in Korean black goats fed two diets differing in forage to concentrate ratios. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 15:195-205.
  19. Jung, G.W., Jo, I.H., Hwangbo, S. and Lee, S.H. 2009. Effects of feeding total mixed rations containing different winter forage crop silages on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and blood characteristics in Korean black goats. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 29(4):389-398. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.4.389
  20. Jung, G.W., Jo, I.H., Hwangbo, S., Lee, S.H. and Song, H.B. 2008. Effects of different feeding systems on nutrient availability, nitrogen retention and blood characteristics in native or crossbred Korean black goats. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 28:341-350. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.4.341
  21. Ki, K.S., Park, S.B., Lim, D.H. and Seo, S.W. 2017. Evaluation of the nutritional value of locally produced forage in Korea using chemical analysis and in vitro ruminal fermentation. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 30:355-362. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0626
  22. Kim, K.K., Hwangbo, S. and Jo, I.H. 2007. Effects of organic TMR with whole barley silage on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and blood characteristics in Korean black goats. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 15:413-424.
  23. Kim, S.W., Yoon, S.H., Kim, J.H., Ko, Y.G., Kim, D.H., Kang, G.H., Kim, Y.S., Lee, S.M. and Suh, S.W. 2012. Effects of feeding levels of concentrate on the growth, carcass characteristics and economic evaluation in feeds based on rice-straw of Korean black goats. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 32(4):429-436. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.4.429
  24. Kingbury, J.M. 1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Soil Science. 98:349. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196411000-00022
  25. Larbi, A., Smith, J.W., Kurdi, I.O., Adekunle, I.O., Raji, A.M. and Ladipo, D.O. 1998. Chemical composition, rumen degradation, and gas production characteristics of some multipurpose fodder trees and shrubs during wet and dry seasons in the humid tropics. Animal Feed Science Technology. 72:81-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00170-3
  26. Lee, B.D., Lee, S.K. and Lee, K.D. 1999. Effects of activated charcoal on in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics and nutrient disappearances. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science. 26(2):25-32.
  27. Lee, W.S., Lee, B.S., Oh, Y.K., Kim, K.H., Kang, S.W., Lee, S.S. and Ha, J.K. 2004. Effects of concentrate to roughage ratios on duration and frequencies of rumination and chewing in Hanwoo Steers. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 46:55-60. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2004.46.1.055
  28. Li, M., Penner, G.B., Hernandez-Sanabria, E., Oba, M. and Guan, L.L. 2009. Effects of sampling location and time, and host animal on assessment of bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in the bovine rumen. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 107:1924-1934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04376.x
  29. Loor, J.J., Elolimy, A.A. and McCann, J.C. 2016. Dietary impacts on rumen microbiota in beef and dairy production. Animal Frontiers. 6:22-29.
  30. McAllan, A.B., Lewis, P.E. and Griffith, E.S. 1987. The effects of frequency of feeding on some quantitative aspects of digestion in the rumens of growing steers. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 37(9):791-803.
  31. Mehrez, A.Z., Orskov, E.R. and McDonald, I. 1977. Rates of rumen fermentation in relation to ammonia concentration. British Journal of Nutrition. 38(3):437-443. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19770108
  32. Moore, J. 1970. Procedures for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forages. Nutrition Research Techniques for Domestic and Wild Animals. 1:5001-5003.
  33. Morais, S. and Mizrahi, I. 2019. The road not taken: The rumen microbiome, functional groups, and community states. Trends in Microbiology. 27:538-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2018.12.011
  34. Na, H.R., Bae, G.S., Kim, C.H., Kim, E.J. and Chang, M.B. 2021. Evaluation of typical protein sources for Hanwoo cattle on rumen bypass protein and their effects on the composition of rumen microbial amino acids. Journal of Agriculture and Life Science. 55(1):91-99.
  35. Na, Y., Hwang, S., Choi, Y., Park, G. and Lee, S. 2018. Nutrient digestibility and greenhouse gas emission in castrated goats (capra hircus) fed various roughage sources. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 38(1):39-43. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2018.38.1.39
  36. Nocek, J.E., Steele, R.L. and Braund, D.G. 1985. Effect of mixed ration nutrient density on milk of cows transferred from high production group. Journal of Dairy Science. 68:133-139. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(85)80806-7
  37. Pearson, R.A., Archibald, R.F. and Muirhead, R.H. 2007. A comparison of the effect of forage type and level of feeding on the digestibility and gastrointestinal mean retention time of dry forages given to cattle, sheep, ponies and donkeys. British Journal of Nutrition. 95:88-98. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN20051617
  38. Tilley, J.M.A. and Terry, R.A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science. 18:104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
  39. Troelsen, J.E. and Hanel, D.J. 1966. Ruminant digestion in vitro as affected by inoculum donor, collection day, and fermentation time. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 46:149-156. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas66-022
  40. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2