Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회논문집)

Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of Conditional Spectra to Seismic Fragility Assessment for an NPP Containment Building based on Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

조건부스펙트럼을 적용한 원전 격납건물의 비선형 동적 해석 기반 지진취약도평가

  • Shin, Dong-Hyun (Department of Architecture, Incheon National University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Hun (Division of Architecture and Urban Design, Incheon National University) ;
  • Jeon, Seong-Ha (Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, Incheon National University)
  • 신동현 (인천대학교 일반대학원 건축학과) ;
  • 박지훈 (인천대학교 도시건축학부) ;
  • 전성하 (인천대학교 산학협력단)
  • Received : 2020.12.23
  • Accepted : 2021.03.26
  • Published : 2021.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Conditional spectra (CS) are applied to the seismic fragility assessment of a nuclear power plant (NPP) containment building for comparison with a relevant conventional uniform hazard response spectrum (UHRS). Three different control frequencies are considered in developing conditional spectra. The contribution of diverse magnitudes and epicentral distances is identified from deaggregation for the UHRS at a control frequency and incorporated into the conditional spectra. A total of 30 ground motion records are selected and scaled to simulate the probability distribution of each conditional spectra, respectively. A set of lumped mass stick models for the containment building are built considering nonlinear bending and shear deformation and uncertainty in modeling parameters using the Latin hypercube sampling technique. Incremental dynamic analysis is conducted for different seismic input models in order to estimate seismic fragility functions. The seismic fragility functions and high confidence of low probability of failure (HCLPF) are calculated for different seismic input models and analyzed comparatively.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 산업통상자원부(MOTIE)와 한국에너지기술평가원(KETEP)의 지원을 받아 수행한 연구 과제입니다(No. 20201510100020).

References

  1. EPRI, Seismic Fragility and Seismic Margin Guidance for Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessments. EPRI 3002012994. EPRI Palo Alto. CA. c2018.
  2. Choi IK, Ahn SM, Choun YS. Seismic Fragility Analysis of PSC Containment Building by Nonlinear Anaysis. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2006 Feb;10(1):63-74.
  3. Choi IK, Choun YS, Ahn SM, Seo JM. Probabilistic seismic risk analysis of CANDU containment structure near-fault earthquakes. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. Republic of Korea. 2008 Jun;238(6):1382-1391.
  4. Kim MK, Choi IK. Effect of Evaluation Response Spectrum on the Seismic Risk of Structure. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2009 Dec;13(6):39-46.
  5. Hahm D, Seo JM, Choi IK, Rhee HM. Uniform Hazard Spectrum Evaluation Method for Nuclear Power Plants on Soil Sites based on the Hazard Spectra of Bedrock Sites. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2012 Jun;16(3):35-42.
  6. Baker JW. Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2011 Mar;137(3):322-331. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000215
  7. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Creteria for Buildings and other Structures. c2017.
  8. Haselton CB, Baker JW, Stewart JP, Whittaker AS, Luco N, Fry A, Hamburger RO, Zimmerman RB, Hooper JD, Charney FA, Pekelnicky RG. Response History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP provisions and ASCE/SEI 7 Standard: part I - overviwe and Specification of Ground Motions. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):373-395.
  9. Haselton CB, Fry A, Hamburger RO, Baker JW, Zimmerman RB, Luco N, Elwood KJ, Hooper JD, Charney FA, Pekelinicky RG, Whittaker AS. Response History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP Provisions and ASCD/SEI 7 Standard:Part II-Structural Aanlysis Procedures and Acceptance Criteria. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):397-417.
  10. Jarrett JA, Zimmerman RB, Charney FA, Jalalian A. ResponseHistory Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP Provisions and ASCE/SEI 7 Sthandard: Part IV-A Study of Assumptions. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):449-468.
  11. Zimmerman RB, Baker JW, Hooper JD, Bono S, Haselton CB, Engel A, Hamburger RO, Celikbas A, Jalalian A. Response History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP Provisions and ASCD/SEI 7 Standard : Part III - Example Applications Illustrating the Recommended Methodology. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):419-447.
  12. Renault P. PEGASOS refinement project: new findings and challenges from a PSHA for Swiss Nuclear Power Plants, Transactions, SMiRT 21. 2011 Nov;Div-IV:Paper ID# 561.
  13. Renault P, Kurmann D. Comparison of uniform hazard spectra and conditional spectra approach in the framework of fragility curve development. Transactions. SMiRT 22. 2013 Aug;Div-IV.
  14. Renault P, Proske D, Kurmann D, Asfura AP. Evaluation of the seismic risk of a NPP building using the conditional spectra approach. Transactions. SMiRT 23. 2015 Aug;Div-IV.
  15. Renault P, Asfura AP. Comparison of approaches for selecting and adjusting time histories to be used in seismic fragility analyses. Transactions. SMiRT 25. 2019 Aug;Div-IV.
  16. Reed JW, Kennedy RP. Methodology for developing seismic fragilities, EPRI TR-103959. Electric Power Research Institute. Palo Alto. CA. c1994.
  17. Park WH, Park JH. Seismic Fragility Assessment of NPP Containment Structure based on Conditional Mean Spectra for Multiple Earthquake Scenarios. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2019 Nov;23(6):301-309. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2019.23.6.301
  18. Park WH, Seismic Fragility Analysis of Nuclear Power Plant Containment Structures Based on Conditional Spectrum. Incheon National University. 2019 Dec.
  19. Korea Electrical Power Corporation. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., LTD. APR1400 DESIGN CONTROL DOCUMENT TIER2. APR1400-K-X-FS-14002-NP REVISION 0. Republic of Korea. c2014.
  20. Japan Electric Association (JEA). Technical Guidelines for A Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants. JEAG-4601. Japan Electric Association. Tokyo. Japan. c1991.
  21. Chang GA, Mander JB. Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: part 1 - evaluation of seismic capacity, NCEER Technical Rep. No. NCEER-94-0006, c1994.
  22. Ogaki Y, Kobayashi M, Takeda T, Yamaguchi T, Yoshizaki K, Sugano S. Shear strength tests of prestressed concrete containment vessels. SMiRT-6. 1981;13(22)J4/3.
  23. American Society of Civil Engineers. Seismic Design Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components in Nuclear Facilities. ASCE/SEI 43-05. American Society of Civil Engineers. c2005.
  24. Atkinson GM, Boore DM. Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2006;96(6):2181-2205. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050245
  25. Lin T, Harmsen SC, Baker JW, Luco N. Conditional spectrum computation incorporating multiple causal earthquakes and ground motion prediction models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2013;103(2A):1103- 1116. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110293
  26. Al Atik L, Abrahamson NA. An improved method for non-stationary spectral matching. Earthquake Spectra. 2010;26(3):601-617. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3459159
  27. Jayaram N, Lin T, Baker JW. A Computationally Efficient GroundMotion Selection Algorithm for Matching a Target Response Spectrum Mean and Variance. Earthquake Spectra. 2011 Aug;27(3):797-815. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3608002
  28. Helton JC, Davis FJ. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2003;81(1):23-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00058-9
  29. Vamvatsikos DC, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002;31(3):491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  30. Jiang L, Zhong J, He M, Yuan W. Optimal seismic intensity measure selection for isolated bridges under pulse-like ground motions. Advances in Civil Engineering. c2019.
  31. Khosravikia F, Clayton P. Updated evaluation metrics for optimal intensity measure selection in probabilistic seismic demand models. Engineering Structures 2020;202(109899).
  32. Baker JW. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra. c2014.