DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intracorporeal Esophagojejunostomy during Reduced-port Totally Robotic Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: a Novel Application of the Single-Site® Plus 2-port System

  • Choi, Seohee (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Son, Taeil (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Song, Jeong Ho (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sejin (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Minah (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Yoo Min (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyoung-Il (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hyung, Woo Jin (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2021.01.25
  • Accepted : 2021.05.14
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy during reduced-port gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer is a technically challenging technique. No study has yet reported a robotic technique for anastomosis. Therefore, to address this gap, we describe our reduced-port technique and the short-term outcomes of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent a totally robotic reduced-port total or proximal gastrectomy between August 2016 and March 2020. We used an infra-umbilical Single-Site® port with two additional ports on both sides of the abdomen. To transect the esophagus, a 45-mm endolinear stapler was inserted via the right abdominal port. The common channel of the esophagojejunostomy was created between the apertures in the esophagus and proximal jejunum using a 45-mm linear stapler. The entry hole was closed with a 45-mm linear stapler or robot-sewn continuous suture. All anastomoses were performed without the aid of an assistant or placement of stay sutures. Results: Among the 40 patients, there were no conversions to open, laparoscopic, or conventional 5-port robotic surgery. The median operation time and blood loss were 254 min and 50 mL, respectively. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 40.5. The median time to first flatus, soft diet intake, and length of hospital stay were 3, 5, and 7 days, respectively. Three (7.5%) major complications, including two anastomosis-related complications and a case of small bowel obstruction, were treated with an endoscopic procedure and re-operation, respectively. No mortality occurred during the study period. Conclusions: Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy during reduced-port gastrectomy can be safely performed and is feasible with acceptable surgical outcomes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing.

References

  1. Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, et al. A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg 2015;39:2734-2741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3160-z
  2. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage i gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 2016;263:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346
  3. Park DJ, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Kim MC, Kim W, Ryu SY, et al. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopyassisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1548-1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2065-7
  4. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:627-633.
  5. Kang SH, Cho YS, Min SH, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, et al. Early experience and learning curve of solo single-incision distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a review of consecutive 100 cases. Surg Endosc 2019;33:3412-3418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06638-1
  6. Kim SM, Ha MH, Seo JE, Kim JE, Choi MG, Sohn TS, et al. Comparison of single-port and reduced-port totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for patients with early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2016;30:3950-3957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4706-8
  7. Lee S, Kim JK, Kim YN, Jang DS, Kim YM, Son T, et al. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial. Surg Endosc 2017;31:4002-4009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5435-y
  8. Kim YY, Lee Y, Lee CM, Park S. Lymphadenectomy using two instrument arms during robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a strategy to facilitate reduced-port robotic gastrectomy. Asian J Surg 2020;43:459-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.05.014
  9. Seo WJ, Son T, Roh CK, Cho M, Kim HI, Hyung WJ. Reduced-port totally robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a modified technique using Single-Site® and two additional ports. Surg Endosc 2018;32:3713-3719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6208-y
  10. Lee JH, Son T, Kim J, Seo WJ, Rho CK, Cho M, et al. Intracorporeal delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy in reduced-port robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2018;32:4344-4350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6244-7
  11. Kunisaki C, Miyamoto H, Sato S, Tanaka Y, Sato K, Izumisawa Y, et al. Surgical outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy versus conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensitymatched retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:3604-3612. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6733-x
  12. Kunisaki C, Makino H, Kimura J, Takagawa R, Ota M, Kosaka T, et al. Application of reduced-port laparoscopic total gastrectomy in gastric cancer preserving the pancreas and spleen. Gastric Cancer 2015;18:868-875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0441-4
  13. Kawamura H, Tanioka T, Kuji M, Tahara M, Takahashi M. The initial experience of dual port laparoscopyassisted total gastrectomy as a reduced port surgery for total gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 2013;16:602-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-012-0212-z
  14. Ahn SH, Son SY, Jung DH, Park YS, Shin DJ, Park DJ, et al. Solo intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy reconstruction using a laparoscopic scope holder in single-port laparoscopic total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer 2015;15:132-138. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2015.15.2.132
  15. Inaba K, Satoh S, Ishida Y, Taniguchi K, Isogaki J, Kanaya S, et al. Overlap method: novel intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:e25-e29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.005
  16. Cho M, Son T, Kim HI, Noh SH, Choi S, Seo WJ, et al. Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2019;33:1757-1768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6448-x
  17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  18. Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Lee YJ, Park JM, Kim JJ, et al. A feasibility study of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a prospective multi-center phase II clinical trial, KLASS 03. Gastric Cancer 2019;22:214-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0864-4
  19. Brenkman HJ, Haverkamp L, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Worldwide practice in gastric cancer surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:4041-4048. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.4041
  20. Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Kunisaki C, Sakuramoto S, Inaki N, et al. Single-arm confirmatory trial of laparoscopy-assisted total or proximal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1401. Gastric Cancer 2019;22:999-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00929-9
  21. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, et al. Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage i gastric cancer: the KLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:506-513. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727
  22. Kim HB, Kim SM, Ha MH, Seo JE, Choi MG, Sohn TS, et al. Comparison of reduced port totally laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (Duet TLTG) and conventional laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2016;26:e132-e136. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000329
  23. Kunisaki C, Makino H, Yamaguchi N, Izumisawa Y, Miyamato H, Sato K, et al. Surgical advantages of reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy in gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2016;30:5520-5528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4916-8
  24. Son T, Lee JH, Kim YM, Kim HI, Noh SH, Hyung WJ. Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2606-2615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3511-0
  25. Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 2009;249:927-932. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73