대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제37권6호
  • /
  • Pages.117-126
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

르 코르뷔지에의 자연관에 대한 비판의 전개 양상

Development of Criticisms on Le Corbusier's Perspectives on Nature

  • 김영민 (서울시립대학교 조경학과)
  • Kim, Youngmin (Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Seoul)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.22
  • 심사 : 2021.05.27
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Until now Le Corbusier has been accused of the sin separating modern architecture from nature. However, Le Corbusier had never insisted that his architecture was disconnected from the outer world, rather he had tried to establish a close relationship between the built environment and nature. The purpose of this study is to track where the negative perception of Le Corbusier's perspective on nature was originated from and how it had been developed. In the 1920s, Le Corbusier's attitude on nature reflected in his abstract and mechanic architecture was blamed by Haring and Wright who supported the concept of Organic Architecture. Later on, the interpretation of Hitchcock and Gideon strengthened the bias on the separation between architecture and nature in Le Corbusier's theory and practice. Even though Le Corbusier's attitude towards nature had changed significantly in the 1930s, the schema of the 1920s was fixed by both his supports and dissenters as his international influence of works and theory of the 1920s became greater. New theoretical interpretation on Le Corbusier in the 1960s, suggested by Rowe and Eisenman did not change the stereotype view but reinforced it. In the 1970s Rowe provides a complete version of abstract schema on architecture and nature by expanding Gideon's interpretation of Le Corbusier to the city. After the 1980s, there have been ongoing efforts to reevaluate Le Corbusier's thoughts and works on the landscape, it is hard to say that the theoretical view on his perspectives on nature is changed much. Le Corbusier's influence and contribution on forming the framework of the modern landscape still remains to be further discovered.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2021년도 서울시립대학교 교내학술연구비에 의하여 지원되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Banham, R. (1960). Theory and Design in the First Machine Age, London, The Architectural Press.
  2. Constant, C. (1987). From the Virginian dream to Chandigarh: Le Corbusier and the modern landscape, Architectural Review, 181, 66-72.
  3. Cohen, J. (2013). In the cause of landscape. In J. Cohen, (Ed.), Le Corbusier: An Atlas of Modern Landscape, New York, The Museum of Modern Art, 23.
  4. Collins, P. (1965). Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950, London, Faber & Faber.
  5. Curtis, W. J. R. (1987). Le Corbusier: Ideas & Forms, London, Phaidon Press, 114-115, 109.
  6. Eisenman, P. (Ed.) Five Architects: Eisenman, Graves, Gwathmey, Hejduk, Meier, New York, George Wittenborn & Co.
  7. Frampton, K. (1972). Frontality vs. Rotation, In P. Eisenman (Ed.) Five Architects: Eisenman, Graves, Gwathmey, Hejduk, Meier, New York, George Wittenborn & Co.
  8. Frampton, K. (1988). Le Corbusier, London: Thames & Hudson, 114, 224.
  9. Gideon, S. (1967). Space, Time, and Architecture (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 527. (Original work published 1941)
  10. Haring, H. (1925). Wege zur Form, Die Form, 1, Reprinted in H. Lauterbach & J. Joedicke (Eds.), 1965, Hugo Haring. Schriften, Entwurfe, Bauten. Dokumente der Modernen Architektur Band 4, Stuttgart, Kramer, 14.
  11. Haring, H. (1931). Kunst und strukturprobleme des bauens, Zentralbatt der Bauverwaltung, 29.
  12. Haring, H. (1932). Versuch einer orientierung, Die Form, 7, 220, 32.
  13. Haring, H. (1934). Proportionen, Deutsche Bauzeitung, Vol. 29, Reprinted in H. Lauterbach & J. Joedicke (Eds.), 1965, Hugo Haring. Schriften, Entwurfe, Bauten. Dokumente der Modernen Architektur. Band 4, Stuttgart, K. Kramer, 34.
  14. Hegel H. W. F. (2008) The Philosophy of Nature, (B. Park, Trans.) Seoul, Nanam. (Original work published 1847)
  15. Hitchcock, H. R. (1932). The International Sytle: Architecture Since 1922, New York, W.W. Norton, 77.
  16. Jones, P. B. (1999). Hugo Haring: The Organic versus the Geometric, Stuttgart, Axel Menges, 220.
  17. Jenks, C. (2000). Le Corbusier: and the Continual Revolution in Architecture, New York, Monacelli Press, 189-190, 189, 293.
  18. Le Corbusier (1987). The City of Tomorrow and Its Planning, (F. Etchells, Trans.) Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. (Original work published 1925)
  19. Le Corbusier (2004). Precisions on the Present State of Architecture and City Planning, (J. Jung and K. Lee, Trans.) Seoul, Dongneok. (Original work published 1930)
  20. Leatherbarrow, D. (2009). Architecture Otherwise, New York, Princeton Architectural Press. 271-295.
  21. Mallgrave, H. F. (2005). Modern Architectural Theory: A Historical Survey, 1673-1968, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 245.
  22. Mallgrave, H. F., & D. Goodman, (2011). An Introduction to Architectural Theory, 1968 to the Present, Hoboken, NJ, Wiley-Blackwell, 30, 215-226.
  23. Mumford, L. (1947). Skyline, Status Quo, The New Yorker, 11, 108-109.
  24. Mumford, E. (2000). The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism, 1928-1960, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  25. Neutra, R. J. (1954). Survival through Design, London, Oxford University Press.
  26. Sarin, M. (1979). Urban planning, petty trading and squatter settlements in Chandigarh, India, In R. Bromley & Gerry, C. (Eds.) Casual Work and Poverty in Third World Cities, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 133-160.
  27. Shindler, R. M. (1934). Space Architecture, Dune Forum, 44-46.
  28. Skirbekk, G., & Gilje, N. (2000). A History of Western Thought 1, (H. Yoon, Trans.) Seoul, Yihaksa.
  29. Sterling, J. (1955). Garches to Jaoul: Le Corbusier as domestic architect in 1927 and 1953, Architectural Review, 118, 145-151.
  30. Park, J. (2004). A Study of process ideological of Le Corbusier's utopian attitude towards nature, Journal of Architectural History, 13(2), 7-19.
  31. Pevsner, N. (1960). Pioneers of Modern Design, London, Penguin.
  32. Reichlin, B. (1984) The Pros and Cons of the Horizontal Window: The Perret-Le Corbusier Controversy, Diadalos, 13, 64-78.
  33. Reichlin, B. (2013) Le Pradet: "The composition is shaped by the landscape." In J. Cohen, (Ed.), Le Corbusier: An Atlas of Modern Landscape, New York, The Museum of Modern Art, 178-184.
  34. Rowe, C. (1947). The mathematics of the ideal villa: Palladio and Le Corbusier compared, Architectural Review, 101, 101-104.
  35. Rowe, C. (1950). Mannerism and modern architecture, Architectural Review, 107, 289-299.
  36. Rowe, C., & Koetter, F. (1978) Collage City, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  37. Ruegg, A. (2013). Paris and the suburbs: Interior and landscape, contrasts and analogies, In J. Cohen, (Ed.), Le Corbusier: An Atlas of Modern Landscape, New York, The Museum of Modern Art, 268-273.
  38. Tafuri, M. (1976). Architecture and Utopia, Design and Capitalist Development, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  39. Treib, M. (2017). Landscapes of Modern Architecture: Wrights, Mies, Neutra, Aalto, Barragan, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 13.
  40. Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, New York, Museum of Modern Art.
  41. Vidler, A. (2013) Paris: Beistegui apartment, or horizons deferred. In J. Cohen, (Ed.), Le Corbusier: An Atlas of Modern Landscape, New York, The Museum of Modern Art, 274-279.
  42. Wright, F. L. (1928, September). Towards a New Architecture, World Unity, in F. L. Wright, 1992, Frank Lloyd Wright Collected Writings, Vol. 1: 1894-1930, Pfeiffer B. B. (Ed.), New York, Rizzoli, 317-318.
  43. Wright, F. L. (1929, July). Surface and mass - Again!, Architectural Record, in F. L. Wright, 1992, Frank Lloyd Wright Collected Writings, Vol. 1: 1894-1930, Pfeiffer B. B. (Ed.), New York, Rizzoli, 327.
  44. Wright, F. L. (1931). Modern Architecture: Being the Kahn Lectures, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, Reprinted in F. L. Wright, 1992, Frank Lloyd Wright Collected Writings, Vol. 2: 1931-1932, Pfeiffer B. B. (Ed.), New York, Rizzoli, 58.
  45. Zevi, B. (1951). Towards Organic Architecture, London, Faber & Faber. (Original work published 1945)
  46. Zevi, B. (1957). Architecture as Space: Howe to look at architecture, (M. Gendel, Trans.) New York, Horizon Press, (Original work published 1948)
  47. Zizek, S. (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology, London, Verso. (S. Lee Trans.) Ingansarang, 2001, 60.