Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene (한국치위생학회지)

Korean Society of Dental Hygiene (한국치위생학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of human rights indicators for dental hygiene students

치위생(학)과 학생들의 인권 실태 지표 개발: 치과의료기관 임상실습을 중심으로

  • Won, Yoon-Ah (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Yonsei University) ;
  • Noh, Hie-Jin (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University) ;
  • Mun, So-Jung (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chung, Won-Gyun (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Bo-Young (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Yonsei University) ;
  • Sim, Eun-Bi (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Eun-Mi (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Yonsei University)
  • 원윤아 (연세대학교 일반대학원 치위생학과) ;
  • 노희진 (소프트웨어디지털헬스케어융합대학 치위생학과) ;
  • 문소정 (소프트웨어디지털헬스케어융합대학 치위생학과) ;
  • 정원균 (소프트웨어디지털헬스케어융합대학 치위생학과) ;
  • 박보영 (연세대학교 일반대학원 치위생학과) ;
  • 심은비 (연세대학교 일반대학원 치위생학과) ;
  • 최은미 (연세대학교 일반대학원 치위생학과)
  • Received : 2021.04.13
  • Accepted : 2021.06.04
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to develop human rights indicators through reliability and validity tests in order to measure the human rights situation of dental hygiene students who experience clinical practice at dental clincs. Methods: The basic framework of questions was constructed through literature review. Nine experts were tested for validity of the contents of the experts twice. The main survey was conducted on 121 students in the 3rd and 4th grade who were enrolled in the department of dental hygiene located in Seoul, Gyeonggi and Gangwon-do. Validity was tested through exploratory factor analysis, and reliability was tested through internal reliability coefficient and test-retest method. Results: The cronbach's α value was 0.734, and the Kappa coefficient was 0.584. The result of the reliability and validity test was composed of 11 questions and 3 factors. Conclusions: During the practice of a dental institution, the validity and reliability of the indicators that can grasp the human rights status of dental hygiene students were tested. It is expected that the indicators of this study will be provided an opportunity to understand the human rights situation of dental hygiene students and to improve problems such as human rights violations.

Keywords

References

  1. Jang KA. Factors affecting clinical competency of dental hygiene students. J Korea Converg Soc 2015;6(6):35-42. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.6.035
  2. Son JL, Lee EB, Jang JH. Relationship between incivility through clinical experience and major satisfaction in dental hygiene students. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2016;16(5):701-8. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2016.16.05.701
  3. Lee HY, Kim SR, Park ES, Choi GJ, Kim SY, Lee DJ, et al. A survey on the human rights situation of medical students. Seoul: National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea; 2018:31-51.
  4. Hakojarvi HR, Salminen L, Suhonen R. Health care students' personal experiences and coping with bullying in clinical training. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34(1):138-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.08.018
  5. Thomas SP, Burk R. Junior nursing students' experiences of vertical violence during clinical rotations. Nurs Outlook 2009;57(4):226-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2008.08.004
  6. Choi J. Convergence relationship study on clinical practice stress and professional identity in some dental hygiene students. J Korea Converg Soc 2019;10(1):79-85. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.1.079
  7. Kim JH, Kim JJ, Kim IS, Kang EE, Kim BN, Kim HM, et al. Socialworker's humanrights situationsurvey. Soeul: National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea; 2013:210-8.
  8. OHCHR U. Human rights indicators: A guide to measurement and implementation. New York and Geneva: UNOHCHR; 2012:2-85.
  9. Lee HW, Song SH, Lee MA. A study on setting the basic direction ofthe establishment of human rights guarantee and promotion basic plan. Gyeonggi: Gyeonggi Research Institute; 2015:15-7.
  10. Binmadi NO, Alblowi JA. Prevalence and policy of occupational violence against oral healthcare workers: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 2019;19(1):279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0974-3.
  11. DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication; 2016:1-280.
  12. Oh BS, Park JB, Kim BG, Hong SP, Park GS. Commentary on human rights. Seoul: National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea; 2011:34-108.
  13. Korea Law Information Center. Constitution of the republic of Korea [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 20]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/법령/대한민국헌법.
  14. Kang ST, Kim JS, Park JH.Developing the indicators of human rights in the university. Seoul: National Human Rights Commision of the Republic of Korea; 2009:32-63.
  15. Choi CY, Park YG, Kim JH, Yim ST, Jeon SM, Jo SH, et al. A study on the reality of Korean youth human rights level againstinternational standards I: Development of youth human rights indicators. Seoul: National Youth Policy Institute; 2006:47-190.
  16. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity.Nurs Res 1986;35(6):382-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
  17. Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess 1995;7(3):286. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.286
  18. Field A. Exploratory factor analysis. In :Discovering statisticsusing IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. Editedby Field A: London: Sage; 2013:670-8.
  19. Hair JF Jr,Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multi variate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall; 2010:91-146.
  20. Muzaffer S, Sirakaya-Turk E, Uysal M. Factor analytical procedure and scale reliability. In: Research methods for leisure, recreation and tourism. 2nd ed. Edited by Sirakaya-Turk E, Uysal M, Hammitt WE, Vaske JJ: Boston: CABI; 2017:320-38.
  21. Park MS, Kang KJ, Jang SJ, Lee JY, Chang SJ. Evaluating test-retest reliability in patient-reported outcome measures for older people: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2018;79:58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.003
  22. Streiner DL. Figuring out factors: The use and misuse of factor analysis. Can J Psychiatry 1994;39(3):135-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379403900303
  23. UN, UN General Assembly. Universal declaration of human rights. United States of America: UN General Assembly 1948;302(2):14-25.
  24. Korea NHRCoTRo. National perception survey on discrimination in 2020. Seoul: National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea; 2020:16-33.
  25. Hwang JI, Park SY, Ju JS, An SS, Dong JY, Shin SS, et al. Sexual harassment survey in 2018. Seoul: Ministry of Gender Equality and Family; 2018:76-187.
  26. Lee KH, Shin SJ. Validity of instrument development research in Korean nursing research. J Korean Acad Nurs 2013;43(6):697-703. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.697
  27. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310