Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing Spillovers of Domestic Varieties Developed by Rural Development Agencies

농촌진흥기관 개발 품종의 경제적 파급효과 분석

  • Kim, Seong-Sup (Farm and Agribusiness Management Division, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Su (Strategy Consulting HyeAn) ;
  • Yun, Jin-Woo (Strategy Consulting HyeAn) ;
  • Chae, Yong-Woo (Research Performance Management Division, Rural Development Administration)
  • 김성섭 (농촌진흥청 농산업경영과) ;
  • 이동수 (전략컨설팅 혜안(주)) ;
  • 윤진우 (전략컨설팅 혜안(주)) ;
  • 채용우 (농촌진흥청 연구성과관리과)
  • Received : 2021.03.02
  • Accepted : 2021.06.04
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined the spillovers (economics) of domestic varieties. The analysis model used the supply-driven of inter-industry analysis (input-output analysis), and the scope of the study was limited to the varieties developed by rural development agencies. The spillovers were analyzed by dividing into the effects on production inducement and employment inducement. First, the effects on production inducement were the largest in Sindongjin, a rice variety, with 49,599.3 billion won. Seolhyang, a strawberry variety, was the second largest with 32,936.9 billion won. On the other hand, Baekma, a flower variety, was small at 87.7 billion won. On the other hand, this is a very large number considering the small area of cultivation of flowers and how most of the flower varieties depend on overseas varieties. Second, the effect on the employment inducement coefficient appeared in a similar order to the effect on production inducement. Sindongjin was the largest with 756,682, and Seolhyang was 701,403. Baekma was analyzed as 1,582 people. The results are of great significance in that it quantitatively analyzed the spillovers of the varieties developed by rural development agencies and ensured a justification for the development of varieties by national institutions through their value.

본 연구는 국산 품종의 경제적 파급효과를 분석하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었다. 분석모형은 산업연관분석의 공급견인모형을 활용하였으며, 연구의 범위는 농촌진흥기관 개발 품종으로 한정하였다. 경제적 파급효과는 생산유발효과와 취업유발효과로 구분하여 분석하였다. 먼저, 생산유발효과는 벼 품종인 신동진이 495,993억원으로 가장 크게 나타났으며, 딸기 품종인 설향은 329,369억원으로 두 번째로 컸다. 반면 화훼류 품종인 백마는 877억원으로 적었으나, 화훼류가 재배면적이 적은 부분과 화훼품종 대부분이 해외 품종에 의존하고 있는 상황을 고려하면 매우 큰 수치이다. 둘째, 취업유발효과는 생산유발효과와 비슷한 순서로 나타났다. 신동진이 756,682명으로 가장 컸으며, 설향은 701,403명이었다. 백마는 1,582명으로 분석되었다. 본 연구의 결과는 농촌진흥기관 개발품종의 경제적 파급효과를 정량적으로 분석하고, 그 가치를 통해 국가기관에서 수행되는 품종개발의 당위성을 확보했다는데 큰 의의가 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 농촌진흥청 연구사업(PJ01404202)의 지원에 의해 수행되었음.

References

  1. H. T. Park, K. H. Park, Tasks for the leap of the seed industry, Korea Rural Economic Institute, 2013, pp.1.
  2. K. H. Park, H. T. Park, C. G. Chung, I. W. Yu, J. S. Shin, Recent Trends of the seed industry and a strategy to foster domestic seed companies, korea rural economic institute, Korea Rural Economic Institute, 2010, pp.4.
  3. J. N. Hwang, Golden seeds, seeds more expensive than gold, Korea Institute of science and technology information, Korea Rural Economic Institute, 2014, pp.11-12.
  4. Korea Seed & Variety Service, Variety protection registration status, http://www.seed.go.kr, (accessed Dec. 31, 2020)
  5. Korea Seed & Variety Service, Seed import and export trends, Public Data Portal, https://data.go.kr, (accessed Jan. 4, 2021)
  6. D. G. Park, J. H. Song, Policy tasks for improving self-sufficiency rate of grain, Agricultural Outlook 2013, Korea Rural Economic Institute, 2013, pp.1-130.
  7. W. S. Park, Countermeasures in Korea's agricultural and food sectors to the Nagoya protocol, Korea Rural Economic Institute, 2016, pp.1-130.
  8. Y. H. Lim, J. R. Lee, H. I. Park, S. J. Choo, Policy initiative on science and technology-based agricultural innovation for food security, science and technology policy institute, 2019, pp.1-130.
  9. O. S. Kwon, Analyzing Spillovers of R&D Expenditures Using Input-Output Tables, Korea Agricultural Economics Association, Vol.51, No.3, pp.27-45, Sep. 2010.
  10. W. Ju, J. G. Park, J. R. Lee, Analyzing cost-benefit & spilovers of horticulture breeding R&D, Productivity review, Vol.27, No.3, pp.5-29, Sep. 2013.
  11. C. Y. Hong, Regional economic impacts of R&D investment using regional input-output statistics, Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planing, 2018, pp.1-130.
  12. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planing, Guideline on The preliminary feasibility study for national R&D programs, 2019, pp.294.
  13. Statistics Korea, Crop production survey, agricultural and forestry production index, and consumer price survey by item, https://kosis.kr, (accessed Dec. 31, 2020)
  14. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Flower Cultivation Status, 2019, pp.44-45.
  15. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Agricultural outlook 2020, 2020, pp.343-514.
  16. Department of Agricultural Outlook, Agricultural outlook_furit and vegetables_strawberry, Korea Rural Economic Institute, https://aglook.krei.re.kr, (accessed Dec. 31, 2020)
  17. Rural Development Administration, cultivated area of minor crop: Institutional Internal Data, 2020.
  18. Bank of Korea, 2015 Input-Output Statistics, 2019, pp.252-253.
  19. Foundation of Agri. Tech. Commercialization & Transfer, Plant Variety Valuation Manual, 2016, pp.71-72.
  20. Ministry of Trand, industry and energy, Practical Guide for Technology Valuation, 2017, pp.54.
  21. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Supply and demand analysis and establishment of response directions for mid-to long-term horticultural specialty crops, 2016, pp.205, 323.
  22. Rural Development Administration, Study on Agriculture Technology Valuation and Economic Impact, 2015, pp.262-291.