한국해양공학회지 (Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology)

  • 제35권3호
  • /
  • Pages.238-246
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-0767(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6715(eISSN)
한국해양공학회 (Korean Society of Ocean Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Engagement-Scenario-Based Decoy-Effect Simulation Against an Anti-ship Missile Considering Radar Cross Section and Evasive Maneuvers of Naval Ships

  • Kim, Kookhyun (School of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Tongmyong University)
  • 투고 : 2021.05.17
  • 심사 : 2021.06.14
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The survivability of a naval ship is the ability of the ship and its onboard systems to remain functional and continue a designated mission in man-made hostile environments. A passive decoy system is primarily used as a weapon system for improving the survivability of a naval ship. In this study, an engagement scenario-based simulation program was developed for decoy effectiveness assessments against an anti-ship missile (ASM), which tracks a target with sea-skimming and active radar homing. The program can explain the characteristics of a target ship, such as the radar cross section and evasive maneuvers, as well as the operational performance of the onboard decoy system, the guidance method of the ASM, and the engagement environment's wind speed and direction. This paper describes the theory and formulations, configuration, and user interface of the developed program. Numerical examples of a decoy effect assessment of a virtual naval ship against an ASM are presented.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by Tongmyong University Research Grants 2019 (2019A020-1).

참고문헌

  1. An, B., & Seo, S. (2015). A Study on the Setting Procedure of Standard Value and Design Target Value for the RCS Reduced Design for Naval Ships. Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, 26(6), 581-588. https://doi.org/10.5515/KJKIEES.2015.26.6.581
  2. Chapman, S.J., & Benke, K. (2000). Assessment of Ship Air Defence Performance by Modelling and Simulation. Proceedings of the Simulation Technology and Training Conference, Perth WA, Australia, 235-241.
  3. Dan, J., Hao, C., & Lei, Z. (2016). A Simulation Study of Chaff Echo Signal Based on LFM. International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 9(4). 131-140. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsip.2016.9.4.12
  4. Kim, K., & Lee, J. (2014). Integrated Survivability Assessment Given Multiple Penetration Hits. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 28(1), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2014.28.1.069
  5. Kim, K. (2020). Decoy Effectiveness Simulation Against Anti-Ship Missile Considering RCS and Tactical Diameter of Warship. Proceeding of Korean Society of Ocean Engineers Fall Conference, On-line, 198-200.
  6. Kumar, R. (1990). Defense of Surface Ships Against Anti-Ship Missiles (Master's thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA, USA.
  7. Lukenbill, F.C. (1990). A Target Missile Engagement Scenario Using Classical Proportional Navigation (Master's thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA, USA.
  8. Manji, N., Kocakanat, M., & Kitsikis, A. (2002). Quantifying the Effects of Chaff Screening on Hardkill and Softkill Coordination (Report No. RTO-MP-097(I)). Ottawa Canada: Defense R&D Canada.
  9. Poulos, A.M. (1994). An Anti-air Warfare Study for a Small Size Navy (Master's thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA, USA.
  10. TTI. (2002). User's Guide: ASCMA Anti-Ship Cruise Missile ECM Effectiveness Simulator. 3.2, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Tactical Technologies Inc.
  11. Seo, D.W., Nam, H., Kwon O., & Myung, N.H. (2012). Dynamic RCS Estimation of Chaff Clouds. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 48(3), 2114-2127. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2012.6237582
  12. Swee, J. CS. (2000). Missile Terminal Guidance and Control Against Evasive Target (Master's thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA, USA.