DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preoperative Assessment of Renal Sinus Invasion by Renal Cell Carcinoma according to Tumor Complexity and Imaging Features in Patients Undergoing Radical Nephrectomy

  • Ji Hoon Kim (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kye Jin Park (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Mi-Hyun Kim (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Jeong Kon Kim (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2020.06.01
  • 심사 : 2021.02.22
  • 발행 : 2021.08.01

초록

Objective: To identify the association between renal tumor complexity and pathologic renal sinus invasion (RSI) and evaluate the usefulness of computed tomography tumor features for predicting RSI in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 276 consecutive patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for RCC with a size of ≤ 7 cm between January 2014 and October 2017. Tumor complexity and anatomical renal sinus involvement were evaluated using two standardized scoring systems: the radius (R), exophytic or endophytic (E), nearness to collecting system or sinus (N), anterior or posterior (A), and location relative to polar lines (RENAL) nephrometry and preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomical classification (PADUA) system. CT-based tumor features, including shape, enhancement pattern, margin at the interface of the renal sinus (smooth vs. non-smooth), and finger-like projection of the mass, were also assessed by two independent radiologists. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors of RSI. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy of anatomical renal sinus involvement, and tumor features were evaluated. Results: Eighty-one of 276 patients (29.3%) demonstrated RSI. Among highly complex tumors (RENAL or PADUA score ≥ 10), the frequencies of RSI were 42.4% (39/92) and 38.0% (71/187) using RENAL and PADUA scores, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that a non-smooth margin and the presence of a finger-like projection were significant predictors of RSI. Anatomical renal sinus involvement showed high NPVs (91.7% and 95.2%) but low accuracy (40.2% and 43.1%) for RSI, whereas the presence of a non-smooth margin or finger-like projection demonstrated comparably high NPVs (90.0% and 91.3% for both readers) and improved accuracy (67.0% and 73.9%, respectively). Conclusion: A non-smooth margin or the presence of a finger-like projection can be used as a preoperative CT-based tumor feature for predicting RSI in patients with RCC.

키워드

과제정보

We thank Seo Young Park, a statistician of Asan Medical Center, who helped improve manuscript.

참고문헌

  1. Bonsib SM. The renal sinus is the principal invasive pathway: a prospective study of 100 renal cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:1594-1600 
  2. Bonsib SM, Gibson D, Mhoon M, Greene GF. Renal sinus involvement in renal cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:451-458 
  3. Trpkov K, Grignon DJ, Bonsib SM, Amin MB, Billis A, Lopez-Beltran A, et al. Handling and staging of renal cell carcinoma: the International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus (ISUP) conference recommendations. Am J Surg Pathol 2013;37:1505-1517 
  4. Kim C, Choi HJ, Cho KS. Diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography for renal sinus fat invasion in renal cell carcinoma patients. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:914-918 
  5. Bolster F, Durcan L, Barrett C, Lawler LP, Cronin CG. Renal cell carcinoma: accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of renal sinus fat invasion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2016;40:851-855 
  6. Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Cheville JC, Webster WS, Lohse CM, Kwon ED, et al. Is renal sinus fat invasion the same as perinephric fat invasion for pT3a renal cell carcinoma? J Urol 2005;174:1218-1221 
  7. Bamias A, Escudier B, Sternberg CN, Zagouri F, Dellis A, Djavan B, et al. Current clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and critical evaluation. Oncologist 2017;22:667-679 
  8. Buffi NM, Saita A, Lughezzani G, Porter J, Dell'Oglio P, Amparore D, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex (PADUA Score ≥10) tumors: techniques and results from a multicenter experience at four high-volume centers. Eur Urol 2020;77:95-100 
  9. Kim SP, Campbell SC, Gill I, Lane BR, Van Poppel H, Smaldone MC, et al. Collaborative review of risk benefit trade-offs between partial and radical nephrectomy in the management of anatomically complex renal masses. Eur Urol 2017;72:64-75 
  10. Kim SP, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Weight CJ, Han LC, Murad MH, et al. Comparative effectiveness for survival and renal function of partial and radical nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 2012;188:51-57 
  11. Gershman B, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, Costello BA, Cheville JC, et al. Radical versus partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2018;74:825-832 
  12. Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME, Bass EB, Cadeddu JA, Chang A, et al. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol 2017;198:520-529 
  13. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bensalah K, Dabestani S, Fernandez-Pello S, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2019 update. Eur Urol 2019;75:799-810 
  14. Mir MC, Derweesh I, Porpiglia F, Zargar H, Mottrie A, Autorino R. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical T1b and T2 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2017;71:606-617 
  15. Gorin MA, Ball MW, Pierorazio PM, Tanagho YS, Bhayani SB, Kaouk JH, et al. Outcomes and predictors of clinical T1 to pathological T3a tumor up-staging after robotic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis. J Urol 2013;190:1907-1911 
  16. Tay MH, Thamboo TP, Wu FM, Zhaojin C, Choo TB, Ramaan L, et al. High R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry scores are associated with pathologic upstaging of clinical T1 renal-cell carcinomas in radical nephrectomy specimens: implications for nephron-sparing surgery. J Endourol 2014;28:1138-1142 
  17. Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, Macchi V, Porzionato A, De Caro R, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2009;56:786-793 
  18. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182:844-853 
  19. Williamson SR, Rao P, Hes O, Epstein JI, Smith SC, Picken MM, et al. Challenges in pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma: an interobserver variability study of urologic pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol 2018;42:1253-1261 
  20. Fukui S, Miyake M, Iida K, Onishi K, Hori S, Morizawa Y, et al. The preoperative predictive factors for pathological T3a upstaging of clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2019;9:76 
  21. Ni D, Ma X, Li HZ, Gao Y, Li XT, Zhang Y, et al. Factors associated with postoperative renal sinus invasion and perinephric fat invasion in renal cell cancer: treatment planning implications. Oncotarget 2017;9:10091-10099 
  22. Kim SY, Woo S, Hwang SI, Moon MH, Sung CK, Lee HJ, et al. Usefulness of resistive index on spectral Doppler ultrasonography in the detection of renal cell carcinoma in patients with end-stage renal disease. Ultrasonography 2014;33:136-142 
  23. Hedgire SS, Elmi A, Nadkarni ND, Cao K, McDermott S, Harisinghani MG. Preoperative evaluation of perinephric fat invasion in patients with renal cell carcinoma: correlation with pathological findings. Clin Imaging 2013;37:91-96 
  24. Kim J, Park JS, Heo JE, Elghiaty A, Jang WS, Rha KH, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts pathological renal sinus fat invasion in renal cell carcinomas of ≤7 cm with presumed renal sinus fat invasion. Yonsei Med J 2019;60:1021-1027 
  25. Liu Y, Song T, Huang Z, Zhang S, Li Y. The accuracy of multidetector computed tomography for preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma. Int Braz J Urol 2012;38:627-636 
  26. El-Hefnawy AS, Mosbah A, El-Diasty T, Hassan M, Shaaban AA. Accuracy of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in staging of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): analysis of risk factors for mis-staging and its impact on surgical intervention. World J Urol 2013;31:887-891 
  27. Jeong SH, Kim JK, Park J, Jeon HJ, Yoon MY, Jeong CW, et al. Pathological T3a upstaging of clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: outcomes according to surgical technique and predictors of upstaging. PLoS One 2016;11:e0166183 
  28. Nayak JG, Patel P, Saarela O, Liu Z, Kapoor A, Finelli A, et al. Pathological upstaging of clinical T1 to pathological T3a renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of short-term outcomes. Urology 2016;94:154-160 
  29. Sokhi HK, Mok WY, Patel U. Stage T3a renal cell carcinoma: staging accuracy of CT for sinus fat, perinephric fat or renal vein invasion. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20140504 
  30. Amin MB, Edge SB. AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th ed. New York: Springer, 2017 
  31. Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, Gwet KL. A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:61 
  32. Koo KC, Kim JC, Cho KS, Choi YD, Hong SJ, Yang SC, et al. Oncological outcomes after partial vs radical nephrectomy in renal cell carcinomas of ≤7 cm with presumed renal sinus fat invasion on preoperative imaging. BJU Int 2016;117:87-93 
  33. Fernando A, Fowler S, O'Brien T; British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS). Nephron-sparing surgery across a nation - outcomes from the British Association of Urological Surgeons 2012 national partial nephrectomy audit. BJU Int 2016;117:874-882