Acknowledgement
We appreciate Mr. Wooin Jung, RT, for his excellent technical supports.
References
- van der Linde D, Rossi A, Yap SC, McGhie JS, van den Bosch AE, Kirschbaum SW, et al. Ascending aortic diameters in congenital aortic stenosis: cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography. Echocardiography 2013;30:497-504 https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.12086
- Nickl W, Futh R, Smettan J, Kohler T, Lankisch M, Kramer F, et al. Assessment of aortic valve area combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arq Bras Cardiol 2012;98:234-242 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2012005000017
- Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL, Bertella E, Mushtaq S, Gripari P, et al. Comparison of accuracy of aortic root annulus assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance versus echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2013;112:1790-1799 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.050
- Altiok E, Frick M, Meyer CG, Al Ateah G, Napp A, Kirschfink A, et al. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2014;113:1859-1866 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.038
- Garcia J, Capoulade R, Le Ven F, Gaillard E, Kadem L, Pibarot P, et al. Discrepancies between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography in the measurement of transvalvular gradient in aortic stenosis: the effect of flow vorticity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:84
- Hamm K, Trinkmann F, Heggemann F, Gruettner J, Schmid-Bindert G, Borggrefe M, et al. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using a hybrid approach of Doppler echocardiography and inert gas rebreathing. In Vivo 2012;26:1027-1033
- Speiser U, Quick S, Haas D, Youssef A, Waessnig NK, Ibrahim K, et al. 3-T magnetic resonance for determination of aortic valve area: a comparison to echocardiography. Scand Cardiovasc J 2014;48:176-183 https://doi.org/10.3109/14017431.2014.906646
- Singh A, McCann GP. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of aortic stenosis. Heart 2019;105:489-497 https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313003
- Choe YH, Kim SM, Park SJ. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of aortic valve stenosis: an update. Precis Future Med 2020;4:119-132 https://doi.org/10.23838/pfm.2020.00093
- Kim MY, Park EA, Lee W, Lee SP. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking in aortic stenosis: exploration of strain parameters and prognostic value in asymptomatic patients with preserved ejection fraction. Korean J Radiol 2020;21:268-279 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0441
- Bak SH, Kim SM, Park SJ, Kim MY, Kim HJ, Lee SC, et al. Semiautomated analysis of aortic stenosis parameters on velocity-encoded phase-contrast MR images in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a comparison with echocardiography. Cardiovasc Imaging Asia 2017;1:78-85 https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2016.00087
- Lee JW, Hur JH, Yang DH, Lee BY, Im DJ, Hong SJ, et al. Guidelines for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 2: interpretation of cine, flow, and angiography data. Cardiovasc Imaging Asia 2019;3:113-124 https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2019.00115
- Jo Y, Kim J, Park CH, Lee JW, Hur JH, Yang DH, et al. Guidelines for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging from Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (KOSCI) - Part 1: standardized protocol. Investig Magn Reson Imaging 2019;23:296-315 https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2019.23.4.296
- Tanaka K, Makaryus AN, Wolff SD. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:799-805 https://doi.org/10.1080/10976640701545479
- Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, Vancraeynest D, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1436-1443 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21182
- Dimitriou P, Kahari A, Emilsson K, Thunberg P. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of stenotic aortic valve area: a comparative study. Acta Radiol 2012;53:995-1003 https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2012.120261
- Song I, Park JA, Choi BH, Ko SM, Shin JK, Chee HK, et al. Morphological and functional evaluation of quadricuspid aortic valves using cardiac computed tomography. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:463-471 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.463
- John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR, Rau M, Ricken W, Bachmann G, et al. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:519-526 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00707-1
- Ahn JH, Kim SM, Park SJ, Jeong DS, Woo MA, Jung SH, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction as a mechanism of angina in severe AS: prospective adenosine-stress CMR study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1412-1422 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.013
- Tandon A, Grayburn PA. Imaging of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:184-195 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.005
- Fairbairn TA, Steadman CD, Mather AN, Motwani M, Blackman DJ, Plein S, et al. Assessment of valve haemodynamics, reverse ventricular remodelling and myocardial fibrosis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Heart 2013;99:1185-1191 https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303927
- Buchner S, Debl K, Schmid FX, Luchner A, Djavidani B. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of the aortic valve stenosis: an in vivo and ex vivo study. BMC Med Imaging 2015;15:34
- Myerson SG. Heart valve disease: investigation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:7