Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Imaging Spectrum of Augmented Breast and Post-Mastectomy Reconstructed Breast with Common Complications: A Pictorial Essay

  • Renuka Nair Kunju Krisnan (Department of Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital) ;
  • Niketa Chotai (Department of Radiology, RadLink Diagnostic Imaging Center and Visiting Consultant, Tan Tock Seng Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.06.17
  • Accepted : 2020.11.28
  • Published : 2021.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Breast augmentation is becoming more common, be it for cosmetic reasons or post-mastectomy. Multiple articles in the literature describe the imaging findings of various types of cosmetic breast augmentation. Some articles describe imaging findings for different types of post-mastectomy reconstructions. This essay aims to serve as a comprehensive reference for the multimodality imaging of various types of breast augmentations in native breast and post-mastectomy reconstructions. Familiarity with these findings will facilitate the detection of complications and new or recurrent breast malignancies in patients. With the extensive illustrations provided in this essay on normal and abnormal imaging findings of augmented breasts, readers will receive exposure that will facilitate effective practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Yang N, Muradali D. The augmented breast: a pictorial review of the abnormal and unusual. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W451-W460 
  2. Wong T, Lo LW, Fung PY, Lai HY, She HL, Ng WK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast augmentation: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2016;7:399-410 
  3. Brown SL, Middleton MS, Berg WA, Soo MS, Pennello G. Prevalence of rupture of silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in Birmingham, Alabama. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1057-1064 
  4. Cheng NX, Wang YL, Wang JH, Zhang XM, Zhong H. Complications of breast augmentation with injected hydrophilic polyacrylamide gel. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002;26:375-382 
  5. Teo SY, Wang SC. Radiologic features of polyacrylamide gel mammoplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:W89-W95 
  6. Venkataraman S, Hines N, Slanetz PJ. Challenges in mammography: part 2, multimodality review of breast augmentation--imaging findings and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W1031-W1045 
  7. Erguvan-Dogan B, Yang WT. Direct injection of paraffin into the breast: mammographic, sonographic, and MRI features of early complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:888-894 
  8. Vasconez HC. TRAM flap variations in breast reconstruction. In: Hall-Findlay E, Evans G, eds. Aesthetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Philadelphia: Saunders Ltd., 2010:88-91 
  9. Hogge JP, Zuurbier RA, de Paredes ES. Mammography of autologous myocutaneous flaps. Radiographics 1999;19:S63-S72 
  10. Dialani V, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ. MR imaging of the reconstructed breast: what the radiologist needs to know. Insights Imaging 2012;3:201-213 
  11. Brinton LA, Lubin JH, Burich MC, Colton T, Brown SL, Hoover RN. Breast cancer following augmentation mammoplasty (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:819-827 
  12. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:1296-1316 
  13. Raj SD, Shurafa M, Shah Z, Raj KM, Fishman MDC, Dialani VM. Primary and secondary breast lymphoma: clinical, pathologic, and multimodality imaging review. Radiographics 2019;39:610-625