The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제13권3호
  • /
  • Pages.180-190
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Micro-shear bond strengths of resin-matrix ceramics subjected to different surface conditioning strategies with or without coupling agent application

  • Gunal-Abduljalil, Burcu (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University) ;
  • Onoral, Ozay (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University) ;
  • Ongun, Salim (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.15
  • 심사 : 2021.06.14
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose. This study aimed to assess the influence of various micromechanical surface conditioning (MSC) strategies with or without coupling agent (silane) application on the micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) of resin- matrix ceramics (RMCs). Materials and Methods. GC Cerasmart (GC), Lava Ultimate (LU), Vita Enamic (VE), Voco Grandio (VG), and Brilliant Crios (BC) were cut into 1.0-mm-thick slices (n = 32 per RMC) and separated into four groups according to the MSC strategy applied: control-no conditioning (C), air-borne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide particles (APA), 2W- and 3W-Er,Cr:YSGG group coding is missing. The specimens in each group were further separated into silane-applied and silane-free subgroups. Each specimen received two resin cement microtubules (n = 8 per subgroup). A shear force was applied to the adhesive interface through a universal test machine and µSBS values were measured. Data were statistically analyzed by using 3-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test. Failure patterns were scrutinized under stereomicroscope. Results. RMC material type, MSC strategy, and silanization influenced the µSBS values (P<.05). In comparison to the control group, µSBS values increased after all other MSC strategies (P<.05) while the differences among these strategies were insignificant (P>.05). For control and APA, there were insignificant differences between RMCs (P>.05). The silanization decreased µSBS values of RMCs except for VE. Considerable declines were observed in GC and BC (P<.05). Conclusion. MSC strategies can enhance bond strength values at the RMC - cement interface. However, the choice of MSC strategy is dependent on RMC material type and each RMC can require a dedicated way of conditioning.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barutcigil K, Barutcigil C, Kul E, Ozarslan MM, Buyukkaplan US. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to a CAD/CAM Restorative Material. J Prosthodont 2019;28:71-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12574
  2. Cengiz-Yanardag E, Kurtulmus Yilmaz S, Karakaya I, Ongun, S. effect of different surface treatment methods on micro-shear bond strength of CAD-CAM restorative materials to resin cement. J Adhes Sci Technol 2019;33:110-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1514992
  3. Conejo J, Ozer F, Mante F, Atria PJ, Blatz MB. Effect of surface treatment and cleaning on the bond strength to polymer-infiltrated ceramic network CAD-CAM material. J Prosthet Dent 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10/1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.016
  4. Ghallab O, Wahsh M, Kamel M. Assessment of Er, Cr: YSGG laser surface treatment and self-adhesive resin cements formulae on microtensile bond strength to various CAD/CAM ceramic esthetic. Egypt Dent J 2018; 64:1459-72. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2018.77459
  5. Harorli OT, Barutcugil C, Kirmali O, Kapdan A. Shear bond strength of a self-etched resin cement to an indirect composite: effect of different surface treatments. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:405-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.151783
  6. Helbling F, Ozcan M. Adhesion of resin cement to contemporary hybrid ceramic and polymeric CAD/CAM materials: effect of conditioning methods and ageing. J Adhes Sci Technol 2019;33:886-902. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1564528
  7. Alp G, Subasi MG, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Effect of different resin cements and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of ceramic-glass polymer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:454-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.016
  8. Bellan MC, Cunha PFJSD, Tavares JG, Spohr AM, Mota EG. Microtensile bond strength of CAD/CAM materials to dentin under different adhesive strategies. Braz Oral Res 2017;31:e109.
  9. Ghorab S, Farahat D. Influence of sandblasting parameters and luting materials on microshear bond strength to a CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material. Egypt Dent J 2020;66:1637-48. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2020.24097.1123
  10. Eldafrawy M, Greimers L, Bekaert S, Gailly P, Lenaerts C, Nguyen JF, Sadoun M, Mainjot A Silane influence on bonding to CAD-CAM composites: an interfacial fracture toughness study. Dent Mater 2019;35:1279-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.019
  11. Demirtag Z, Culhaoglu AK. Surface roughness of ceramic-resin composites after femtosecond laser irradiation, sandblasting or acid etching and their bond strength with and without silanization to a resin cement. Oper Dent 2019;44:156-67. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-391-L
  12. Lise DP, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Vieira L, Baratieri LN, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of composite cement to novel CAD/CAM materials as a function of surface treatment and aging. Oper Dent 2017; 42:73-81. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-263-L
  13. Marshall SJ, Bayne SC, Baier R, Tomsia AP, Marshall GW. A review of adhesion science. Dent Mater 2010;26:e11-6.
  14. Tzanakakis EG, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT. Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.008
  15. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Ongun S, Karakaya I. The effect of surface treatments on the mechanical and optical behaviors of CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e496-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12749
  16. Oz FD, Canatan S, Bolay S. Effects of surface treatments on the bond strength of composite resin to hybrid computer-assisted design/manufacturing blocks. J Adhes Sci Technol 2019;33:986-1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1575566
  17. Campos F, Almeida CS, Rippe MP, de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Resin bonding to a hybrid ceramic: effects of surface treatments and aging. Oper Dent 2016;41:171-8. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-057-L
  18. Kim JE, Kim JH, Shim JS, Roh BD, Shin Y. Effect of air-particle pressures on the surface topography and bond strengths of resin cement to the hybrid ceramics. Dent Mater J 2017;36:454-60. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-293
  19. Sagirkaya E, Atay A. Effects of different surface treatments on the bond strength of CAD/CAM resin nano ceramic or ceromer to resin cement. Cumhur Dent J 2019;22:226-34. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.497650
  20. Sismanoglu S, Gurcan AT, Yildirim-Bilmez Z, TuruncOguzman R, Gumustas B. Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12:22-32. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.22
  21. Emsermann I, Eggmann F, Krastl G, Weiger R, Amato J. Influence of pretreatment methods on the adhesion of composite and polymer infiltrated ceramic CAD-CAM blocks. J Adhes Dent 2019;21:433-43.
  22. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012;28:467-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.009
  23. Zakir M, Ashraf U, Tian T, Han A, Qiao W, Jin X, Zhang M, Tsoi JKH, Matinlinna JP. The role of silane coupling agents and universal primers in durable adhesion to dental restorative materials-a review. Curr Oral Heal Reports 2016;3:244-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-016-0108-9
  24. Tekce N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Kara D, Baydemir C. Microtensile bond strength of CAD/CAM resin blocks to dual-cure adhesive cement: The effect of different sandblasting procedures. J Prosthodont 2019;28: e485-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12737
  25. Awad MM, Albedaiwi L, Almahdy A, Khan R, Silikas N, Hatamleh MM, Alkhtani FM, Alrahlah A. Effect of universal adhesives on microtensile bond strength to hybrid ceramic. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0865-7
  26. Rodrigues C da S, Guilardi LF, Follak AC, Jacques LB, May LG. Effect of an MDP-containing ceramic primer application on adhesion to a ZLS ceramic with or without prior acid etching. J Adhes Sci Technol 2020. DOI:10.1080/01694243.2020.1855917.
  27. Albero A, Pascual A, Camps I, Grau-Benitez M. Comparative characterization of a novel CAD-CAM polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7:e495-500.
  28. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013;29:419-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002
  29. Komurcuoglu MB, Sagirkaya E, Tulga A. Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:439-46. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.439
  30. Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials for natural teeth. J Dent Res 2018;97:1082-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518779759
  31. Bajraktarova-Valjakova E, Korunoska-Stevkovska V, Kapusevska B, Gigovski N, Bajraktarova-Misevska C, Grozdanov A. Contemporary dental ceramic materials, a review: chemical composition, physical and mechanical properties, indications for use. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018;6:1742-55. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.378
  32. Aboushelib MN, Elsafi MH. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue. Dent Mater 2016;32:529-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.001
  33. Alamoush RA, Silikas N, Salim NA, Al-Nasrawi S, Satterthwaite JD. Effect of the composition of CAD/CAM composite blocks on mechanical properties. Biomed Res Int 2018:4893143. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4893143
  34. Kassem AS, Atta O, El-Mowafy O. Fatigue resistance and microleakage of CAD/CAM ceramic and composite molar crowns. J Prosthodont 2012;21:28-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00773.x
  35. Zandparsa R. Digital imaging and fabrication. Dent Clin North Am 2014;58:135-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2013.09.012
  36. Magne P, Schlichting LH, Paranhos MP. Risk of onlay fracture during pre-cementation functional occlusal tapping. Dent Mater 2011;27:942-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.011
  37. Duarte S, Sartori N, Phark JH. Ceramic-reinforced polymers: CAD/CAM hybrid restorative materials. Curr Oral Health Rep 2016;3:198-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-016-0102-2
  38. Said AM, Zohdy MM, Morsy TS. The effect of aging and surface treatments on micro-shear bond strength of resin nano-ceramic material using two resin cements. J Dent Oral Sci 2020;2:1-4
  39. Sismanoglu S, Turunc-Oguzman R. Microshear bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM restorative materials: effect of surface treatment and aging. J Adhes Sci Technol 2020;34:2484-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1763543
  40. Celik E, Sahin SC, Dede DO. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of indirect resin composite to resin matrix ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:223-31. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.4.223
  41. Harorli OT, Barutcugil C, Kirmali O, Kapdan A. Shear bond strength of a self-etched resin cement to an indirect composite: effect of different surface treatments. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:405-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.151783
  42. Gokce B, Ozpinar B, Dundar M, Comlekoglu E, Sen BH, Gungor MA. Bond strengths of all-ceramics: acid vs laser etching. Oper Dent 2007;32:173-8. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-52
  43. Colombo M, Poggio C, Lasagna A, Chiesa M, Scribante A. Vickers micro-hardness of new restorative CAD/CAM dental materials: evaluation and comparison after exposure to acidic drink. Materials (Basel) 2019;12:1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081246
  44. Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2016;32:e275-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222
  45. Peumans M, Valjakova EB, De Munck J, Mishevska CB, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness of luting composites to different CAD/CAM materials. J Adhes Dent 2016;18:289-302.
  46. Murillo-Gomez F, De Goes MF. Bonding effectiveness of tooth-colored materials to resin cement provided by self-etching silane primer after short-and long-term storage. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:713.e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.018