DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Effect on Domestic PV Capacity under the REC Revision and Mandatory Supply

REC 개정과 의무공급량이 국내 태양광 설비량에 미치는 영향 분석

  • Beak, Hun (Department of Consulting, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Taesung (School of Industrial Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 백훈 (금오공과대학교 컨설팅학과) ;
  • 김태성 (금오공과대학교 산업공학부)
  • Received : 2021.03.10
  • Accepted : 2021.06.20
  • Published : 2021.06.28

Abstract

Currently, the RPS(Renewable Portfolio Standard) is the policy which supplies new and renewable energy. Power generation companies with large capacity should produce renewable energy or secure through the purchase of REC (Renewable Energy Certificates) as mandatory. The government has revised the REC weight several times, which weights each energy source by evaluating the economic and social value of renewable energy sources, and revised the mandatory supply ratio to gradually increase. This study helps to find the impact of policies on related industries. In this study, time-series analysis and regression analysis on the capacity of PV(Photovoltaics) facilities as a dependent variable were performed to analyze the effect of the revision of the REC weight for photovoltaic power generation and the amount of mandatory supply for renewable energy. As a result, it was statistically assessed that the revision of the REC weight and the increase in the mandatory supply has a significant effect on the increase in the amount of PV facilities.

현재 국내 신재생에너지 보급 정책은 RPS(Renewable Portfolio Standard; 공급의무화제도)이다. 대용량 발전사업자는 신재생 의무공급량을 직접 생산하거나 REC(Renewable Energy Certificates; 공급인증서) 구매를 통해서 확보한다. 정부는 신재생 에너지원의 경제적, 사회적 가치를 평가하여 각 에너지원에 가중치를 매기는 REC 가중치를 여러 차례 개정했으며 의무공급 비율도 점차 증가하도록 개정했다. 본 연구는 정부의 정책이 관련 산업에 미치는 영향을 확인하는 데 도움이 된다. 태양광발전에 관한 REC 가중치 개정과 신재생 의무공급량이 태양광 설비량에 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위해 태양광 설비량을 종속변수로 시계열 분석과 의무공급량에 대한 회귀분석을 수행하였다. 결과적으로 REC 가중치 개정과 의무공급량 증가는 태양광 설비량 증가에 유의미한 영향을 미친다는 것을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Grover & M. D. Goslar. (1993). The initiation, adoption, and implementation of telecommunications technologies in US organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 141-163. DOI: 10.1080/07421222.1993.11517994
  2. D. E. Kim. (2017). An empirical study of policy instruments for renewable energy growth: Focusing on the interaction between policy instruments and government effectiveness. Korean Public Administration Review, 51(2), 33-59. https://doi.org/10.18333/KPAR.51.2.33
  3. J. M. Hong. (2011). An AHP Approach for the Importance Weight of Renewable Energy Investment Criterion in the Private Sector. Korean Energy Economic Review, 10(1), 115-142.
  4. S. Y. Huh, M. S. Jo & Y. G. Lee. (2016). Analysis of Priorities of Constructive Factors of New and Renewable Energy Policy in South Korea using Analytic Hierarchical Process. Korea Innovation Studies, 11(1), 29-69.
  5. T. E. Kim. (2011). Determinants of New Renewable Energy Growth: Empirical Testing of the Effectiveness of Feed-in Tariff and Renewable Portfolio Standard Policy. Korean Public Administration Review, 45(3), 305-333. UCI: G704-000298.2011.45.3.008
  6. D. E. Kim, J. W. Park, H. J. Choi & S. C. Yeom. (2014). A Comparative Study of the Determinants of Green Technology Development for Mitigating Climate Change: Focusing on the Renewable Energy. The Korean Association for Policy Studies Spring Conference.
  7. H. S. Lee & S. W. Ahn. (2011). Implementation of RPS and Its influence on the Renewable Energy Promotion. Environment Forum, 165, 1-8. UCI: I410-ECN-0102-2014-500-001763804
  8. D. S. Lee & T. H. Moon. (2015). A Comparative Study on Renewable Energy Policies using System Dynamics Modelling- Focusing on Feed-in Tariff(FIT) and Renewable Portfolio Standards(RPS) policies. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 50(6), 173-187.
  9. J. Y. Kim, S. B. Kim & S. O. Park. (2016). The Effect of the Renewable Portfolio Standards(RPS) on Electric Power Generation in Korea. KOREAN SOCIETY AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRACTION, 27(2), 131-160. UCI: I410-ECN-0101-2017-350-001609601
  10. Y. L. Jung. (2020). A Study on Factors Influencing New and Renewable Energy Growth: Focusing on Renewable Portfolio Standard(RPS) Policy. Seoul National University, Seoul.
  11. S. H. Sonu. (2016). Effect of the REC Price Volatility on the PV System Installation by Private Participants: Empirical Test on a Korea Case under the RPS System. New & Renewable Energy, 12(3), 156-164. https://doi.org/10.7849/ksnre.2016.9.12.3.156
  12. S. J. Lee & S. J. Yun. (2011). Theory and Practice of Renewable Portfolio Standards: Based on an Analysis of Nations with RPS. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration, 19(3), 79-111.
  13. S. D. Lee. (2016). A Comparative Analysis on the Policy Effect of New & Renewable Energy Supply Program: Focusing on Testing of Porter Hypothesis. Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul.
  14. Statistics Korea Statistical Training Institute. (2016). Analysis and Practical Affairs of Time Series Data. Seoul : Spastics Training Institute.
  15. K. D. Ki. (2007). A Time Series Analysis on Relationship of Police and Crime in Korea: 1964-2005. Korean Police Studies Association, 6(2), 257-290. UCI: G704-001889.2007.6.2.005
  16. N. R. Choi. (2012). Application of time series analysis in suicide research. Korea University, Seoul.
  17. W. W. Lee & I. H. Jang. (2018). Time Series Data Analysis Using SPSS. Paju : Free Academy.
  18. K. J. Lee & M. G. Song. (2020). A Time-series Analysis of the Influence Factors on Public Library Patron Numbers. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 54(4), 195-220.
  19. B. S. Baek & J. Y. Moon. (2010). The Analysis on the Relation between Real Military Expenditure and Real GDP through Regression Analysis. Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 36(2), 143-152.
  20. J. H. Yang. (2018). A study on the improvement of REC weight of existing facilities through the utilization factor analysis of PV system for RPS. Doctoral dissertation. Dongguk University, Seoul.