과제정보
We thank all the members of our laboratory for technical support and helpful discussions and the funding agency for their financial support.
참고문헌
- Shenk MK. Fertility and fecundity. In: Whelehan P, Bolin A editors. The international encyclopedia of human sexuality. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. pp. 369-426.
- Wood JW. Fecundity and natural fertility in humans. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol 1989;11:61-109.
- Wang C, Swerdloff RS. Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests. Fertil Steril 2014;102:1502-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.021
- de Kretser DM, Baker HWG. Infertility in men: recent advances and continuing controversies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:3443-50. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.10.6101
- Binsila B, Selvaraju S, Somashekar L, et al. Molecular advances in semen quality assessment and improving fertility in bulls-a review. Indian J Anim Reprod 2018;39:1-10.
- Patel AS, Leong JY, Ramasamy R. Prediction of male infertility by the World Health Organization laboratory manual for assessment of semen analysis: A systematic review. Arab J Urol 2018;16:96-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.10.005
- Aitken RJ, Best FS, Richardson DW, Djahanbakhch O, Templeton A, Lees MM. An analysis of semen quality and sperm function in cases of oligozoospermia. Fertil Steril 1982;38: 705-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46698-7
- Lemack GE, Goldstein M. Presence of sperm in the prevasectomy reversal semen analysis: incidence and implications. J Urol 1996;155:167-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66584-4
- Menkveld R. Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl 2010;12:47-58. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2009.14
- Hoflack G, Opsomer G, Rijsselaere T, et al. Comparison of computer-assisted sperm motility analysis parameters in semen from belgian blue and Holstein-Friesian bulls. Reprod Domest Anim 2007;42:153-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00745.x
- Veeramachaneni DN, Ott RS, Heath EH, McEntee K, Bolt DJ, Hixon JE. Pathophysiology of small testes in beef bulls: relationship between scrotal circumference, histopathologic features of testes and epididymides, seminal characteristics, and endocrine profiles. Am J Vet Res 1986;47:1988-99.
- Bruner KA, Van Camp SD. Assessment of the reproductive system of the male ruminant. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 1992;8:331-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30738-6
- Chenoweth PJ, McPherson FJ. Bull breeding soundness, semen evaluation and cattle productivity. Anim Reprod Sci 2016;169: 32-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.03.001
- Jarow JP, Sharlip ID, Belker AM, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. J Urol 2002;167:2138-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65109-9
- Brazil C, Swan SH, Drobnis EZ, et al. Standardized methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study. J Androl 2004;25:635-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02835.x
- Eo Y, Kim SH, Bang S-G, Oh MG, Park CH, Yoon JT. Effect of Extenders with TCG and DMSO on the Viability of Rabbit Sperm. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol 2019;34:100-5. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.34.2.100
- Rando OJ. Intergenerational transfer of epigenetic information in sperm. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2016;6:a022988. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a022988
- Hajjar C, Sampuda KM, Boyd L. Dual roles for ubiquitination in the processing of sperm organelles after fertilization. BMC Dev Biol 2014;14:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-14-6
- Barbagallo F, Vignera SL, Cannarella R, Aversa A, Calogero AE, Condorelli RA. Evaluation of sperm mitochondrial function: a key organelle for sperm motility. J Clin Med 2020;9: 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020363
- Connor WE, Lin DS, Wolf DP, Alexander M. Uneven distribution of desmosterol and docosahexaenoic acid in the heads and tails of monkey sperm. J Lipid Res 1998;39:1404-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2275(20)32521-9
- Hughes CM, Lewis SE, McKelvey-Martin VJ, Thompson W. A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men, using a modified comet assay. Mol Hum Reprod 1996;2:613-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/2.8.613
- Inoue N, Satouh Y, Ikawa M, Okabe M, Yanagimachi R. Acrosome-reacted mouse spermatozoa recovered from the perivitelline space can fertilize other eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:20008-11. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116965108
- DeJarnette JM, Marshall CE, Lenz RW, Monke DR, Ayars WH, Sattler CG. Sustaining the fertility of artificially inseminated dairy cattle: the role of the artificial insemination industry. J Dairy Sci 2004;87:E93-E104. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70065-X
- Diskin MG. Semen handling, time of insemination and insemination technique in cattle. Animal 2018;12:s75-s84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000952
- Selvaraju S, Parthipan S, Somashekar L, et al. Current status of sperm functional genomics and its diagnostic potential of fertility in bovine (Bos taurus). Syst Biol Reprod Med 2018; 64:484-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2018.1444816
- Karoui S, Diaz C, Serrano M, Cue R, Celorrio I, Carabano MJ. Time trends, environmental factors and genetic basis of semen traits collected in Holstein bulls under commercial conditions. Anim Reprod Sci 2011;124:28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.008
- Verstegen J, Iguer-Ouada M, Onclin K. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 2002;57:149-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00664-1
- Yata VK, Gangwar DK, Sharma V, et al. Semen analysis and sperm characteristics of Karan Fries cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2020;212:106250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106250
- Nallella KP, Sharma RK, Aziz N, Agarwal A. Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril 2006;85:629-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.024
- Groen AF, Steine T, Colleau J-J, Pedersen J, Pribyl J, Reinsch N. Economic values in dairy cattle breeding, with special reference to functional traits. Report of an EAAP-working group. Livest Prod Sci 1997;49:1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00041-9
- Barbas JP, Mascarenhas RD. Cryopreservation of domestic animal sperm cells. Cell Tissue Bank 2009;10:49-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-008-9081-4
- Mahmoud AM, Depoorter B, Piens N, Comhaire FH. The performance of 10 different methods for the estimation of sperm concentration. Fertil Steril 1997;68:340-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81526-9
- Kuster C. Sperm concentration determination between hemacytometric and CASA systems: why they can be different. Theriogenology 2005;64:614-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.047
- Christensen P, Hansen C, Liboriussen T, Lehn-Jensen H. Implementation of flow cytometry for quality control in four Danish bull studs. Anim Reprod Sci 2005;85:201-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.038
- Anzar M, Kroetsch T, Buhr MM. Comparison of different methods for assessment of sperm concentration and membrane integrity with bull semen. J Androl 2009;30:661-8. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.108.007500
- Prathalingam NS, Holt WW, Revell SG, Jones S, Watson PF. The precision and accuracy of six different methods to determine sperm concentration. J Androl 2006;27:257-62. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.05112
- Eggert-Kruse W, Schwarz H, Rohr G, Demirakca T, Tilgen W, Runnebaum B. Sperm morphology assessment using strict criteria and male fertility under in-vivo conditions of conception. Hum Reprod 1996;11:139-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019007
- Eggert-Kruse W, Reimann-Andersen J, Rohr G, Pohl S, Tilgen W, Runnebaum B. Clinical relevance of sperm morphology assessment using strict criteria and relationship with spermmucus interaction in vivo and in vitro. Fertil Steril 1995;63: 612-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57435-4
- Gadea J. Sperm factors related to in vitro and in vivo porcine fertility. Theriogenology 2005;63:431-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.023
- Donnelly ET, Lewis SE, McNally JA, Thompson W. In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome. Fertil Steril 1998; 70:305-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00146-0
- Gago C, Perez-Sanchez F, Yeung C, et al. Morphological characterization of ejaculated cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) sperm. Am J Primatol 1999;47:105-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1999)47:2<105::AID-AJP2>3.0.CO;2-L
- Rijsselaere T, Van Soom A, Hoflack G, Maes D, de Kruif A. Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser. Theriogenology 2004;62:1292-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.01.005
- Cuche E, Marquet P, Depeursinge C. Simultaneous amplitude-contrast and quantitative phase-contrast microscopy by numerical reconstruction of Fresnel off-axis holograms. Appl Opt 1999;38:6994-7001. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.38.006994
- Love CC. Modern techniques for semen evaluation. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2016;32:531-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2016.07.006
- Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ, Sloter E, et al. The association of age and semen quality in healthy men. Hum Reprod 2003;18: 447-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg107
- Yoshida M, Kawano N, Yoshida K. Control of sperm motility and fertility: diverse factors and common mechanisms. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008;65:3446-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-008-8230-z
- Ren D, Navarro B, Perez G, et al. A sperm ion channel required for sperm motility and male fertility. Nature 2001;413:603-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/35098027
- David I, Kohnke P, Lagriffoul G, et al. Mass sperm motility is associated with fertility in sheep. Anim Reprod Sci 2015; 161:75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.08.006
- Shen S, Wang J, Liang J, He D. Comparative proteomic study between human normal motility sperm and idiopathic asthenozoospermia. World J Urol 2013;31:1395-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1023-5
- Hering DM, Olenski K, Kaminski S. Genome-wide association study for poor sperm motility in Holstein-Friesian bulls. Anim Reprod Sci 2014;146:89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.01.012
- Iranpour FG, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Valojerdi MR, Al-Taraihi TMT. Chromomycin A3 staining as a useful tool for evaluation of male fertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000;17:60-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009406231811
- Simon L, Lewis SEM. Sperm DNA damage or progressive motility: which one is the better predictor of fertilization in vitro? Syst Biol Reprod Med 2011;57:133-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/19396368.2011.553984
- Cabrillana ME, Monclus MA, Lancellotti TES, et al. Thiols of flagellar proteins are essential for progressive motility in human spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 2017;29:1435-46. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd16225
- Hardy MP, Dent JN. Regulation of motility in sperm of the red-spotted newt. J Exp Zool 1986;240:385-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402400313
- Morisawa S, Mizuta T, Kubokawa K, Tanaka H, Morisawa M. Acrosome reaction in spermatozoa from the amphioxus acrosome reaction in Branchiostoma belcheri (Cephalochordata, Chordata). Zool Sci 2004;21:1079-84. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.21.1079
- Okamura N, Tajima Y, Soejima A, Masuda H, Sugita Y. Sodium bicarbonate in seminal plasma stimulates the motility of mammalian spermatozoa through direct activation of adenylate cyclase. J Biol Chem 1985;260:9699-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(17)39295-5
- Hess KC, Jones BH, Marquez B, et al. The "soluble" adenylyl cyclase in sperm mediates multiple signaling events required for fertilization. Developmental Cell 2005;9:249-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.06.007
- Elbashir S, Magdi Y, Rashed A, et al. Relationship between sperm progressive motility and DNA integrity in fertile and infertile men. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2018;23:195-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2017.12.002
- Brito LF. Evaluation of stallion sperm morphology. Clinical Techniques in Equine Practice 2007;6:249-64. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ctep.2007.09.004
- Vantman D, Banks SM, Koukoulis G, Dennison L, Sherins RJ. Assessment of sperm motion characteristics from fertile and infertile men using a fully automated computer-assisted semen analyzer. Fertil Steril 1989;51:156-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)60446-6
- Gunzel-Apel A, Gunther C, Terhaer P, Bader H. Computerassisted analysis of motility, velocity and linearity of dog spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil Supplement 1993;47:271-8.
- van der Horst G. Computer Aided Sperm Analysis (CASA) in domestic animals: current status, three D tracking and flagellar analysis. Anim Reprod Sci 2020:106350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106350
- Katz DF, Davis RO, Delandmeter BA, Overstreet JW. Realtime analysis of sperm motion using automatic video image digitization. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1985;21: 173-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(85)90002-1
- Katz DF, Davis RO. Automatic analysis of human sperm motion. J Androl 1987;8:170-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1987.tb02428.x
- Farrell P, Presicce G, Brockett C, Foote R. Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Theriogenology 1998;49:871-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00036-3
- England G, Allen W. Factors affecting the viability of canine spermatozoa: II. Effects of seminal plasma and blood. Theriogenology 1992;37:373-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90195-W
- Moruzzi JF, Wyrobek AJ, Mayall BH, Gledhill BL. Quantification and classification of human sperm morphology by computer-assisted image analysis. Fertil Steril 1988;50:142-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)60022-5
- Gravance CG, Champion Z, Liu IK, Casey PJ. Sperm head morphometry analysis of ejaculate and dismount stallion semen samples. Anim Reprod Sci 1997;47:149-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4320(96)01634-x
- Larsen L, Scheike T, Jensen TK, et al. Computer-assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1562-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.7.1562
- Hirano Y, Shibahara H, Obara H, et al. Andrology: Relationships between sperm motility characteristics assessed by the computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) and fertilization rates in vitro. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:215-20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009420432234
- Gallagher MT, Cupples G, Ooi EH, Kirkman-Brown J, Smith D. Rapid sperm capture: high-throughput flagellar waveform analysis. Hum Reprod 2019;34:1173-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez056
- Bartoov B, Ben-Barak J, Mayevsky A, et al. Sperm motility index: a new parameter for human sperm evaluation. Fertil Steril 1991;56:108-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54427-6
- Rijsselaere T, Van Soom A, Maes D, de Kruif A. Effect of centrifugation on in vitro survival of fresh diluted canine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2002;57:1669-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00663-5
- Krause W, Viethen G. Quality assessment of computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) in the andrology laboratory. Andrologia 1999;31:125-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1999.tb01398.x
- Davis R, Katz D. Operational standards for CASA instruments. J Androl 1993;14:385-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1993.tb00407.x
- Maes D, Mateusen B, Rijsselaere T, et al. Motility characteristics of boar spermatozoa after addition of prostaglandin F2α. Theriogenology 2003;60:1435-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00132-8
- Rijsselaere T, Van Soom A, Maes D, de Kruif A. Effect of technical settings on canine semen motility parameters measured by the Hamilton-Thorne analyzer. Theriogenology 2003;60: 1553-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00171-7
- Nagy A, Polichronopoulos T, Gaspardy A, Solti L, Cseh S. Correlation between bull fertility and sperm cell velocity parameters generated by computer-assisted semen analysis. Acta Vet Hung 2015;63:370-81. https://doi.org/10.1556/004.2015.035
- Byrd W, Bradshaw K, Carr B, et al. A prospective randomized study of pregnancy rates following intrauterine and intracervical insemination using frozen donor sperm. Fertil Steril 1990;53:521-7. http://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53351-2
- Krause W. Computer-assisted semen analysis systems: comparison with routine evaluation and prognostic value in male fertility and assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 1995;10:60-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/10.suppl_1.60
- Soler C, Garcia-Molina A, Sancho M, et al. A new technique for analysis of human sperm morphology in unstained cells from raw semen. Reprod Fertil Dev 2016;28:428-33. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD14087
- Gallagher MT, Smith D, Kirkman-Brown J. CASA: tracking the past and plotting the future. Reprod Fertil Dev 2018;30: 867-74. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD17420
- Stostad HN, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT, Rowe M. Sperm head morphology is associated with sperm swimming speed: a comparative study of songbirds using electron microscopy. Evol 2018;72:1918-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13555
- Maroto-Morales A, Garcia-Alvarez O, Ramon M, et al. Current status and potential of morphometric sperm analysis. Asian J Androl 2016;18:863. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.187581
- Budworth PR, Amann RP, Chapman PL. Relationships between computerized measurements of motion of frozen-thawed bull spermatozoa and fertility. J Androl 1988;9:41-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1988.tb01007.x
- Samper J, Hellander J, Crabo B. Relationship between the fertility of fresh and frozen stallion semen and semen quality. J Reprod Fertil Supplement 1991;44:107.
- Santolaria P, Vicente-Fiel S, Palacin I, et al. Predictive capacity of sperm quality parameters and sperm subpopulations on field fertility after artificial insemination in sheep. Anim Reprod Sci 2015;163:82-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.10.001
- Viudes-de-Castro MP, Moce E, Vicente J, Marco-Jimenez F, Lavara R. In vitro evaluation of in vivo fertilizing ability of frozen rabbit semen. Reprod Domest Anim 2005;40:136-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00568.x
- Broekhuijse MLWJ, Sostaric E, Feitsma H, Gadella BM. Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility. J Anim Sci 2012;90:779-89. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4311
- Tardif S, Laforest J-P, Cormier N, Bailey JL. The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo. Theriogenology 1999;52:447-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00142-9
- Gil MC, Garcia-Herreros M, Baron FJ, Aparicio IM, Santos AJ, Garcia-Marin LJ. Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen. Theriogenology 2009;71:254-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.007
- Bompart D, Garcia-Molina A, Valverde A, et al. CASA-Mot technology: how results are affected by the frame rate and counting chamber. Reprod Fertil Dev 2018;30:810-9. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD17551
- Amann RP, Katz DF. Andrology lab corner*: Reflections on casa after 25 years. J Androl 2004;25:317-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02793.x
- Holt C, Holt WV, Moore HDM. Choice of operating conditions to minimize sperm subpopulation sampling bias in the assessment of boar semen by computer-assisted semen analysis. J Androl 1996;17:587-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1996.tb01837.x
- Betancourt M, Resendiz A. Effect of two insecticides and two herbicides on the porcine sperm motility patterns using computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) in vitro. Reprod Toxicol 2006;22:508-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.03.001
- Broekhuijse MLWJ, Sostaric E, Feitsma H, Gadella BM. Additional value of computer assisted semen analysis (CASA) compared to conventional motility assessments in pig artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2011;76:1473-86.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.05.040
- Tomlinson MJ. Uncertainty of measurement and clinical value of semen analysis: has standardisation through professional guidelines helped or hindered progress? Andrology 2016;4:763-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12209
- Amann RP, Waberski D. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments. Theriogenology 2014;81:5-17.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.004
- Wakimoto Y, Fukui A, Kojima T, Hasegawa A, Shigeta M, Shibahara H. Application of computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) for detecting sperm-immobilizing antibody. Am J Reprod Immunol 2018;79:e12814. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12814
- van der Horst G, Maree L, du Plessis Stefan S. Current perspectives of CASA applications in diverse mammalian spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 2018;30:875-88. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD17468
- De Andrade AFC, De Arruda RP, Celeghini ECC, et al. Fluorescent stain method for the simultaneous determination of mitochondrial potential and integrity of plasma and acrosomal membranes in boar sperm. Reprod Domest Anim 2007;42:190-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00751.x
- Rahman MM, Naher N, Isam MM, et al. Natural vs synchronized estrus: determinants of successful pregnancy in ewes using frozen-thawed Suffolk semen. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol 2020;35:183-9. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.2.183
- Rodriguez-Martinez H. Laboratory semen assessment and prediction of fertility: still utopia? Reprod Domest Anim 2003; 38:312-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00436.x
- Jha PK, Alam MGS, Mansur MAA, et al. Effects of number of frozen-thawed ram sperm and number of inseminations on fertility in synchronized ewes under field condition. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol 2020;35:190-7. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.2.190
- Kang SS, Kim UH, Lee MS, Lee SD, Cho SR. Spermatozoa motility, viability, acrosome integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential and plasma membrane integrity in 0.25 mL and 0.5 mL straw after frozen-thawing in Hanwoo bull. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol 2020;35:307-14. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.4.307
- Graham JK. Assessment of sperm quality: a flow cytometric approach. Anim Reprod Sci 2001;68:239-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4320(01)00160-9
- Yaniz JL, Santolaria P, Marco-Aguado MA, Lopez-Gatius F. Use of image analysis to assess the plasma membrane integrity of ram spermatozoa in different diluents. Theriogenology 2008;70:192-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.03.002
- Qamar AY, Fang X, Kim MJ, Cho J. Myoinositol supplementation of freezing medium improves the quality-related parameters of dog sperm. Animals (Basel) 2019;9:1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121038
- Mahiddine FY, Qamar AY, Kim MJ. Canine amniotic membrane derived mesenchymal stem cells exosomes addition in canine sperm freezing medium. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol 2020;35:268-72. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.3.268
- Qamar AY, Fang X, Kim MJ, Cho J. Improved viability and fertility of frozen-thawed dog sperm using adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep 2020;10:7034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61803-8
- Qamar AY, Fang X, Kim MJ, Cho J. Improved post-thaw quality of canine semen after treatment with exosomes from conditioned medium of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Animals (Basel) 2019;9:865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110865
- Garner DL, Pinkel D, Johnson LA, Pace MM. Assessment of spermatozoal function using dual fluorescent staining and flow cytometric analyses. Biol Reprod 1986;34:127-38. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod34.1.127
- Harrison RAP, Vickers SE. Use of fluorescent probes to assess membrane integrity in mammalian spermatozoa. Reproduction 1990;88:343-52. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0880343
- Pintado B, De La Fuente J, Roldan E. Permeability of boar and bull spermatozoa to the nucleic acid stains propidium iodide or Hoechst 33258, or to eosin: accuracy in the assessment of cell viability. J Reprod Fertil 2000;118:145-52. https://doi.org/10.1530/reprod/118.1.145
- Qamar AY, Fang X, Bang S, Kim MJ, Cho J. Effects of kinetin supplementation on the post-thaw motility, viability, and structural integrity of dog sperm. Cryobiology 2020;95:90-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.05.015
- Garner DL, Johnson LA. Viability assessment of mammalian sperm using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. Biol Reprod 1995;53:276-84. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod53.2.276
- Alm K, Taponen J, Dahlbom M, Tuunainen E, Koskinen E, Andersson M. A novel automated fluorometric assay to evaluate sperm viability and fertility in dairy bulls. Theriogenology 2001;56:677-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00599-4
- Qamar AY, Fang X, Bang S, Shin ST, Cho J. The effect of astaxanthin supplementation on the post-thaw quality of dog semen. Reprod Domest Anim 2020;55:1163-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13758
- Schafer-Somi S, Aurich C. Use of a new computer-assisted sperm analyzer for the assessment of motility and viability of dog spermatozoa and evaluation of four different semen extenders for predilution. Anim Reprod Sci 2007;102:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.03.019
- Hossain MS, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Nagy S, Siqueira AP, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Flow cytometry for the assessment of animal sperm integrity and functionality: state of the art. Asian J Androl 2011;13:406-19. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2011.15
- Campbell R, Dott H, Glover T. Nigrosin eosin as a stain for differentiating live and dead spermatozoa. J Agric Sci 1956; 48:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960003029X
- Fraser LR, Quinn PJ. A glycolytic product is obligatory for initiation of the sperm acrosome reaction and whiplash motility required for fertilization in the mouse. Reproduction 1981;61: 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0610025
- Buffone MG, Foster JA, Gerton GL. The role of the acrosomal matrix in fertilization. Int J Dev Biol 2008;52:511-22. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.072532mb
- Rajabi-Toustani R, Akter QS, Almadaly EA, et al. Methodological improvement of fluorescein isothiocyanate peanut agglutinin (FITC-PNA) acrosomal integrity staining for frozenthawed Japanese Black bull spermatozoa. J Vet Med Sci 2019; 81:694-702. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.18-0560
- Cross NL, Meizel S. Minireview: methods for evaluating the acrosomal status of mammalian sperm. Biol Reprod 1989;41:635-41. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod41.4.635
- Ahmad M, Nasrullah R, Riaz H, Sattar A, Ahmad N. Changes in motility, morphology, plasma membrane and acrosome integrity during stages of cryopreservation of buck sperm. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2014;85: a972. https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v85i1.972
- Cross NL, Watson SK. Assessing acrosomal status of bovine sperm using fluoresceinated lectins. Theriogenology 1994;42: 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90665-6
- Mendoza C, Carreras A, Moos J, Tesarik J. Distinction between true acrosome reaction and degenerative acrosome loss by a one-step staining method using Pisum sativum agglutinin. Reproduction 1992;95:755-63. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0950755
- Mortimer D, Curtis EF, Miller RG. Specific labelling by peanut agglutinin of the outer acrosomal membrane of the human spermatozoon. Reproduction 1987;81:127-35. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0810127
- Kishida K, Sakase M, Minami K, et al. Effects of acrosomal conditions of frozen-thawed spermatozoa on the results of artificial insemination in Japanese Black cattle. J Reprod Dev 2015;61:519-24. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2015-073
- Amaral A, Lourenco B, Marques M, Ramalho-Santos J. Mitochondria functionality and sperm quality. Reproduction 2013;146:R163-R74. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-13-0178
- Aitken RJ, Ryan AL, Baker MA, McLaughlin EA. Redox activity associated with the maturation and capacitation of mammalian spermatozoa. Free Radic Biol Med 2004;36:994-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.01.017
- Pena FJ, Rodriguez Martinez H, Tapia J, Ortega Ferrusola C, Gonzalez Fernandez L, Mcias Garcia B. Mitochondria in mammalian sperm physiology and pathology: a review. Reprod Domest Anim 2009;44:345-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01211.x
- Al-Rubeai M, Emery AN, Chalder S, Goldman MH. A flow cytometric study of hydrodynamic damage to mammalian cells. J Biotechnol 1993;31:161-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1656(93)90158-J
- Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR. Simultaneous measurement by flow cytometry of sperm cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential related to cell motility. J Histochem Cytochem 1982;30:279-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/30.3.6174566
- Kim D-S, Hwangbo Y, Cheong H-T, Park C-K. Effects of discontinuous percoll gradient containing alpha-linolenic acid on characteristics of frozen-thawed boar spermatozoa. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol 2020;35:58-64. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.1.58
- Garner DL, Thomas CA, Joerg HW, DeJarnette JM, Marshall CE. Fluorometric assessments of mitochondrial function and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1997;57:1401-6. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod57.6.1401
- Martinez-Pastor F, Mata-Campuzano M, Alvarez-Rodriguez M, Alvarez M, Anel L, De Paz P. Probes and techniques for sperm evaluation by flow cytometry. Reprod Domest Anim 2010;45(Suppl 2):67-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01622.x
- Marchetti C, Jouy N, Leroy-Martin B, Defossez A, Formstecher P, Marchetti P. Comparison of four fluorochromes for the detection of the inner mitochondrial membrane potential in human spermatozoa and their correlation with sperm motility. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2267-76. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh416
- Boe-Hansen G, Fortes MS, Satake N. Morphological defects, sperm DNA integrity, and protamination of bovine spermatozoa. Andrology 2018;6:627-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12486
- Santi D, Spaggiari G, Simoni M. Sperm DNA fragmentation index as a promising predictive tool for male infertility diagnosis and treatment management - meta-analyses. Reprod Biomed Online 2018;37:315-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.06.023
- De Ambrogi M, Spinaci M, Galeati G, Tamanini C. Viability and DNA fragmentation in differently sorted boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2006;66:1994-2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.05.017
- Koonjaenak S, Johannisson A, Pongpeng P, Wirojwuthikul S, Kunavongkrit A, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Seasonal variation in nuclear DNA integrity of frozen-thawed spermatozoa from Thai AI swamp buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). J Vet Med Series A 2007;54:377-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.2007.00946.x
- Morrell JM, Johannisson A, Dalin A-M, Hammar L, Sandebert T, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Sperm morphology and chromatin integrity in Swedish warmblood stallions and their relationship to pregnancy rates. Acta Vet Scand 2008;50:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-50-2
- Giwercman A, Lindstedt L, Larsson M, et al. Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control study. Int J Androl 2010;33:e221-e7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00995.x
- Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA®) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1289-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.063
- Boe-Hansen GB, Christensen P, Vibjerg D, Nielsen MBF, Hedeboe AM. Sperm chromatin structure integrity in liquid stored boar semen and its relationships with field fertility. Theriogenology 2008;69:728-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.12.004
- Waterhouse K, Haugan T, Kommisrud E, et al. Sperm DNA damage is related to field fertility of semen from young Norwegian Red bulls. Reprod Fertil Dev 2006;18:781-8. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD06029
- Garcia-Macias V, De Paz P, Martinez-Pastor F, et al. DNA fragmentation assessment by flow cytometry and Sperm-Bos-Halomax (bright-field microscopy and fluorescence microscopy) in bull sperm. Int J Androl 2007;30:88-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2006.00723.x
- Evenson DP, Wixon R. Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology 2006;65:979-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.011
- Evenson D, Jost L. Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Methods Cell Sci 2000;22:169-89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009844109023
- Kazerooni T, Asadi N, Jadid L, et al. Evaluation of sperm's chromatin quality with acridine orange test, chromomycin A3 and aniline blue staining in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009;26:591-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9361-3
- Bianchi PG, Manicardi GC, Urner F, Campana A, Sakkas D. Chromatin packaging and morphology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 1996;2:139-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/2.3.139
- Wagner H, Cheng JW, Ko EY. Role of reactive oxygen species in male infertility: an updated review of literature. Arab J Urol 2018;16:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.001
- Alahmar AT. Role of oxidative stress in male infertility: an updated review. J Hum Reprod Sci 2019;12:4-18. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_150_18
- Raad G, Bakos HW, Bazzi M, et al. Differential impact of four sperm preparation techniques on sperm motility, morphology, DNA fragmentation, acrosome status, oxidative stress and mitochondrial activity: a prospective study. Andrology 2021 May 17 [Accepted]. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13038
- Agarwal A, Qiu E, Sharma R. Laboratory assessment of oxidative stress in semen. Arab J Urol 2018;16:77-86. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.008
- Fingerova H, Oborna I, Novotny J, et al. The measurement of reactive oxygen species in human neat semen and in suspended spermatozoa: a comparison. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2009;7:118. http://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-118
- Novotny J, Oborna I, Brezinova J, et al. The occurrence of reactive oxygen species in the semen of males from infertile couples. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2003;147:173-6. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2003.024
- Agarwal A, Bui AD. Oxidation-reduction potential as a new marker for oxidative stress: Correlation to male infertility. Investig Clin Urol 2017;58:385-99. http://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.385
- Agarwal A, Parekh N, Panner Selvam MK, et al. Male Oxidative Stress Infertility (MOSI): Proposed Terminology and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Male Infertility. World J Mens Health 2019;37:296-312. http://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.190055
- Hamilton T, Assumpcao M. Sperm DNA fragmentation: causes and identification. Zygote 2020;28:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199419000595
- Baker MA, Nixon B, Naumovski N, Aitken RJ. Proteomic insights into the maturation and capacitation of mammalian spermatozoa. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2012;58:211-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/19396368.2011.639844
- Brewis IA, Morton IE, Mohammad SN, Browes CE, Moore HDM. Measurement of intracellular calcium concentration and plasma membrane potential in human spermatozoa using flow cytometry. J Androl 2000;21:238-49.
- Caballero I, Vazquez JM, Mayor GM, et al. PSP-I/PSP-II spermadhesin exert a decapacitation effect on highly extended boar spermatozoa. Int J Androl 2009;32:505-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00887.x
- Piehler E, Petrunkina AM, Ekhlasi-Hundrieser M, Topfer-Petersen E. Dynamic quantification of the tyrosine phosphorylation of the sperm surface proteins during capacitation. Cytometry A 2006;69:1062-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20338
- Kim E-J, Talha NAH, Jeon Y-B, Yu I-J. Effect of κ-Carrageenan on Sperm Quality in Cryopreservation of Canine Semen. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol 2019;34:57-63. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.34.1.57
- Samanta L, Swain N, Ayaz A, Venugopal V, Agarwal A. Posttranslational modifications in sperm proteome: the chemistry of proteome diversifications in the pathophysiology of male factor infertility. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2016;1860: 1450-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.04.001
- Gillan L, Evans G, Maxwell WMC. Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential. Theriogenology 2005;63:445-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.024
- Garner DL, Johnson LA, Yue ST, Roth BL, Haugland RP. Dual DNA staining assessment of bovine sperm viability using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. J Androl 1994;15: 620-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1994.tb00510.x
- Dominguez-Rebolledo AE, Martinez-Pastor F, Fernandez-Santos MR, et al. Comparison of the TBARS assay and BODIPY C11 probes for assessing lipid peroxidation in red deer spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim 2010;45:e360-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01578.x
- Nagy S, Jansen J, Topper EK, Gadella BM. A triple-stain flow cytometric method to assess plasma-and acrosomemembrane integrity of cryopreserved bovine sperm immediately after thawing in presence of egg-yolk particles. Biol Reprod 2003;68:1828-35. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.011445
- Harper CV, Barratt CL, Publicover SJ, Kirkman-Brown JC. Kinetics of the progesterone-induced acrosome reaction and its relation to intracellular calcium responses in individual human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 2006;75:933-9. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.106.054627
- Drabovich AP, Saraon P, Jarvi K, Diamandis EP. Seminal plasma as a diagnostic fluid for male reproductive system disorders. Nat Rev Urol 2014;11:278-88. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.74
- Berry DP, Eivers B, Dunne G, McParland S. Genetics of bull semen characteristics in a multi-breed cattle population. Theriogenology 2019;123:202-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.10.006
- Tesi M, Sabatini C, Vannozzi I, et al. Variables affecting semen quality and its relation to fertility in the dog: A retrospective study. Theriogenology 2018;118:34-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.05.018
- Colenbrander B, Gadella B, Stout T. The predictive value of semen analysis in the evaluation of stallion fertility. Reprod Domest Anim 2003;38:305-11. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00451.x
- Rao M, Zhao X-L, Yang J, et al. Effect of transient scrotal hyperthermia on sperm parameters, seminal plasma biochemical markers, and oxidative stress in men. Asian J Androl 2015;17:668-75. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.146967
- Wang J, Wang J, Zhang H-R, et al. Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma from asthenozoospermia patients reveals proteins that affect oxidative stress responses and semen quality. Asian J Androl 2009;11:484-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2009.26
- Druart X, de Graaf S. Seminal plasma proteomes and sperm fertility. Anim Reprod Sci 2018;194:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.04.061
- Viana AGA, Martins AMA, Pontes AH, et al. Proteomic landscape of seminal plasma associated with dairy bull fertility. Sci Rep 2018;8:16323. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34152-w
- Brandon CI, Heusner GL, Caudle AB, Fayrer-Hosken RA. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of equine seminal plasma proteins and their correlation with fertility. Theriogenology 1999;52:863-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00178-8
- Killian GJ, Chapman DA, Rogowski LA. Fertility-associated proteins in Holstein bull seminal plasma. Biol Reprod 1993; 49:1202-7. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod49.6.1202
- Harshan HM, Sankar S, Singh LP, et al. Identification of PDC-109-like protein (s) in buffalo seminal plasma. Anim Reprod Sci 2009;115:306-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.11.007
- Wang YX, Wu Y, Chen HG, et al. Seminal plasma metabolome in relation to semen quality and urinary phthalate metabolites among Chinese adult men. Environ Int 2019;129: 354-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.043
- Kumar A, Kroetsch T, Blondin P, Anzar M. Fertility-associated metabolites in bull seminal plasma and blood serum: 1H nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. Mol Reprod Dev 2015; 82:123-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22450
- Velho ALC, Menezes E, Dinh T, et al. Metabolomic markers of fertility in bull seminal plasma. PloS One 2018;13:e0195279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195279
- Deepinder F, Chowdary HT, Agarwal A. Role of metabolomic analysis of biomarkers in the management of male infertility. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2007;7:351-8. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737159.7.4.351
- Aguiar GFM, Batista BL, Rodrigues JL, et al. Determination of trace elements in bovine semen samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and data mining techniques for identification of bovine class. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:7066-73. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5515
- Bhat GK, Sea TL, Olatinwo MO, et al. Influence of a leptin deficiency on testicular morphology, germ cell apoptosis, and expression levels of apoptosis-related genes in the mouse. J Androl 2006;27:302-10. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.05133
- Foster PMD. Disruption of reproductive development in male rat offspring following in utero exposure to phthalate esters. Int J Androl 2006;29:140-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00563.x
- Liu L, Bao H, Liu F, Zhang J, Shen H. Phthalates exposure of Chinese reproductive age couples and its effect on male semen quality, a primary study. Environ Int 2012;42:78-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.04.005
- Wang Y-X, You L, Zeng Q, et al. Phthalate exposure and human semen quality: Results from an infertility clinic in China. Environ Res 2015;142:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.010
- Norris JL, Caprioli RM. Analysis of tissue specimens by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry in biological and clinical research. Chem Rev 2013;113:2309-42. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr3004295
- Min K-S, Byambaragchaa M, Kim H, Park M-H. Identification of sperm mRNA biomarkers associated with sex-determination in Korean native cows. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol 2019;34:111-6. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.34.2.111
- Jodar M, Soler-Ventura A, Oliva R, et al. Semen proteomics and male infertility. J Proteom 2017;162:125-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2016.08.018
- Intasqui P, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Samanta L, Bertolla RP. Towards the identification of reliable sperm biomarkers for male infertility: a sperm proteomic approach. Andrologia 2018;50:e12919. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12919
- Selvaraju S, Parthipan S, Somashekar L, et al. Occurrence and functional significance of the transcriptome in bovine (Bos taurus) spermatozoa. Sci Rep 2017;7:42392. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42392
- Slowinska M, Paukszto L, Jastrzebski JP, et al. Transcriptome analysis of turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) reproductive tract revealed key pathways regulating spermatogenesis and posttesticular sperm maturation. Poult Sci 2020;99:6094-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.031
- Cho J, Uh K, Ryu J, et al. Development of PCR based approach to detect potential mosaicism in porcine embryos. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol 2020;35:323-8. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.4.323
- Kim S, Cheong HT, Park C. Regulation of the plasminogen activator activity and inflammatory environment via transforming growth factor-beta regulation of sperm in porcine uterine epithelial cells. J Anim Reprod Biotechnol 2020;35: 297-306. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.4.297
- Khalil WA, El-Harairy MA, Zeidan AE, Hassan MA, Mohey-Elsaeed O. Evaluation of bull spermatozoa during and after cryopreservation: Structural and ultrastructural insights. Int J Vet Sci Med 2018;6:S49-S56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2017.11.001
- Carvalho JO, Sartori R, Machado GM, Mourao GB, Dode MAN. Quality assessment of bovine cryopreserved sperm after sexing by flow cytometry and their use in in vitro embryo production. Theriogenology 2010;74:1521-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.06.030
- Capra E, Turri F, Lazzari B, et al. Small RNA sequencing of cryopreserved semen from single bull revealed altered miRNAs and piRNAs expression between High-and Low-motile sperm populations. BMC Genomics 2017;18:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3394-7
- Miller D, Ostermeier GC. Towards a better understanding of RNA carriage by ejaculate spermatozoa. Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:757-67. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml037
- Lalancette C, Miller D, Li Y, Krawetz SA. Paternal contributions: new functional insights for spermatozoal RNA. J Cell Biochem 2008;104:1570-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.21756