디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권6호
  • /
  • Pages.239-250
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AHP 기법을 이용한 블록체인 기술 특성 기반 상대적 중요도 우선순위 분석

Analysis of relative importance priority based on blockchain technology characteristics using AHP technique

  • 오경상 (건국대학교 신산업융합학과) ;
  • 이동명 (건국대학교 신산업융합학과)
  • Oh, Kyoung-Sang (Department of Advanced Industry Fusion, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Myung (Department of Advanced Industry Fusion, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.06
  • 심사 : 2021.06.20
  • 발행 : 2021.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

기업이 신기술의 도입을 검토할 때 기술의 이점을 충분히 활용하기 위해서는 해당 기술과 관련한 기술적 특성에 대한 정확한 파악과 선별적인 적용이 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 기업이 블록체인 기술 신규 적용의 효율성을 높이기 위해 상대 중요도가 높은 기술적 특성을 분석하였다. 선행연구를 통해 확인되는 블록체인의 기술적 특성을 시스템 계층구조 관점에서 재분류하고, 기술적 특성의 하위 세부요인을 도출하였다. 그리고 기업 내 전문가와 SI 전문가를 대상으로 실시한 기술적 특성의 상대적 중요도에 대해 설문조사를 AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process) 기법을 활용해 분석하였다. 분석결과 응답자들은 보안성과 관련한 해킹의 위협에서 데이터 보호를 가장 중요한 요인으로 평가하였다. 그리고 기업 내 전문가와 SI 전문가 간에 기술적 특성에 대한 중요도 및 업종별 전문가 그룹 간의 기술적 특성의 중요도 우선순위 비교결과도 서로 다르게 나타났다. 다가올 4차 산업혁명의 변화에 맞추어 본 연구의 결과는 기업에서 블록체인 기술적용 시에 유용하게 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다. 향후 업종별 블록체인 기술 수용에 필요한 내·외부 요인과 기술도입을 통한 효과에 대한 실증분석도 의미 있는 연구가 될 수 있을 것이다.

When considering the introduction of a new technology, it is important to accurately grasp and selectively apply the technical characteristics related to the technology in order to fully utilize the advantages of the technology. In this study, the technical characteristics of high relative importance were analyzed in order to increase the efficiency of new application of blockchain technology by companies. The technical characteristics of the blockchain identified through previous research were reclassified from the perspective of the system hierarchy, and sub-factors of the technical characteristics were derived. In addition, a questionnaire survey on the relative importance of technical characteristics was conducted for internal experts and SI experts using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. As a result of the analysis, respondents evaluated data protection as the most important factor in the threat of hacking related to security. In addition, it was different that the comparison results of the importance of the technical characteristics between the experts in the company and the SI experts and the priority of the technical characteristics between the expert groups by industry. It is expected that the results of this study will be usefully utilized when using blockchain technology in enterprises in line with the upcoming changes of the 4th industrial revolution. An empirical analysis of the internal and external factors required for adoption of blockchain technology by industry and the effect of technology introduction will be a meaningful study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. World Knowledge Forum homepage. (2016). http://www.wkforum.org
  2. S. J. Kim. (2017). Blockchain ecosystem analysis and implications. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation. Name of Web Site. https://www.kistep.re.kr
  3. Satoshi Nakamoto. (2008). Bitcoin:A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. White paper. DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.3440802
  4. H. Kwak. (2017). Blockchain technology industry and patent trends. Korea Intellectual Property Institute. Name of Web Site. https://www.kiip.re.kr
  5. D. Drescher. (2018). Blockchain Basics : A Non-Technical Introduction in 25 Steps. New York : Apress. DOI : 10.1007/s11408-018-0315-6
  6. J. S. Kim. (2017). A Study on the Factors Affecting the Intention to Accept Blockchain Technology. Domestic Doctorate Thesis Soongsil University Graduate School, Seoul.
  7. Gatner. (2017). Forcast: Blockchain Business Value, Worldwide 2017-2030. Connecticut : Gartner.
  8. M. K. Ahn & Y. S. Park. (2019). Legal System of Blockchain and Domestic and Foreign Blockchain Legal System - Focusing on Industrial Revitalization - Journal of Digital Convergence, 17.10, 67-75. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.10.067
  9. H. S. Cho, S. H. Kim & S. M. Kim. (2019). The current status of the blockchain industry and policy directions for spreading its use. Industry Permanent Institute, Research Report 2019-920. https://www.kiet.re.kr/optional/report/pop_index_kor.jsp?idx=56067
  10. S. W. Kim & H. S Park. (2020). An Exploratory Study on the Factors Determining Acceptance of Blockchain-Based Financial Platform by Gender. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18.3, 139-147. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2020.18.3.139
  11. K. W. Huh. (2020). Things to know and use cases when conducting a blockchain-based project. IBM Korea Client Innovation Lab, IDG Summary 1-12. https://www.idg.co.kr/Research
  12. J. H. Lee, K. H. Lee & D. M. Lee. (2016). A Study on the Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Organization Effectiveness - Moderation effect of CSR education, The Academy of Customer Satisfaction Management, 18(1), 123-144.
  13. A. G. Jeong & G. H. Kim. (2020). Decision making model for introduction of blockchain-based medical information system. Information system research 29.1, 93-111. DOI : 10.5859/KAIS.2020.29.1.93
  14. J. Y. Kim & W. K. Heo. (2018). A study on the issues and tasks of humanities and sociology in the era of the 4th industrial revolution. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16.11. 137-147. DOI : 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  15. S. Y. Kim. (2018). Blockchain acceptance intention and research for revitalization of technology introduction. domestic doctoral thesis Incheon National University, Incheon.
  16. S. K. Cho. (2018). Blockchain Application and Implications in the Financial Industry. In-Depth Analysis Report No. 2018-25, Korea Intellectual Property Research Institute. Name of Web Site. https://www.kiip.re.kr.
  17. J. K. Choi. (2017). Current state of discussion and future tasks for introducing blockchain in the public sector. Proceedings of the Korean Society for Local Government Conference. 1-16.
  18. D. Schatsky. & C. Muraskin. (2015). Beyond bitcoin - Blockchain is coming to disrupt your industry. Deloitte : Deloitte University Press.
  19. S. H. Lee, H. R. Kim & S. P. Hong. (2017). A study on the design method for personal information protection in smart contracts. Journal of Korean Communication Sciences Conference 2017.6, 604-605.
  20. G. P. Choi, J. H. Seo & D. K. Lee. (2017). Blockchain utilization and policy tasks in the financial industry. Financial Report 2017.2, 1-130. https://www.kif.re.kr
  21. S. W. Gil. (2017). Blockchain and cryptocurrency market trends and implications. Information and Communication Industry Promotion Agency.
  22. J. Y. Lee. (2017). Blockchain technology trends and implications. Trends and Issues -.34, Institute for Science and Technology Policy, 1-21.
  23. C. J. Kim. (2019) Blockchain-based service architecture for improving the transparency of online transactions. Journal of the Korea Knowledge and Information Technology Society 14.2, 127-136. DOI : 10.34163/jkits.2019.14.2.003
  24. Ministry of Science and ICT & Korea Institute of Science and Technology Planning and Evaluation (KISTEP), (2018). The Future of Blockchain (2018 Technology Impact Assessment Report). Seoul.
  25. J. M. Jeong. (2019). Blockchain Technology and Legal Issues in Personal Information Protection. Law 68.2, 248-280. DOI : 10.17007/klaj.2019.68.2.008
  26. J. M. Higgins. (1994). 101 creative problem solving techniques. NY : new management publishing company.
  27. T. L. Saaty. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York : McGraw Hill. DOI : 10.21236/ada214804
  28. J. M. Choi & D. M. Lee. (2017). A Study on National R&D Project Proposal Evaluation Indicator for Small-Medium Business -Focusing on R&D Project for Support Marine SMEs, Ocean Policy Research, 32(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.35372/kmiopr.2017.32.2.007
  29. B. W. Kim. (2015). Decision-making layer analysis method. Kims Information Strategy Institute.
  30. C. H. Lee, D. M. Lee & L. Chen. (2019). Relative Importance of Executive Competency Factors of SMEs and Venture Firms in Credit Evaluation, Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(4), 123-136. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.4.123
  31. K. D. Goepel. (2018). Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Vol. 10 Issue 3 2018, 469-487. DOI : 10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590
  32. J. S. Lee & J. H. Kim. (2019). A Study on Fintech Technology and Contents for Building a Financial Platform: A Case of Post Office. Information Society and Media 20.2. 31-65. Name of Web Site. http://www.dbpia.co.kr