DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability study of the Pectoralis Minor Muscle Thickness Measurement using Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging

  • Lim, Ji Young (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Medical Science, Konyang University) ;
  • Lee, Se-Yeong (Department of Physical Therapy, Daejeon Yuseong Sun Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Seung-Hwa (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Medical Science, Konyang University) ;
  • Park, Dae-Sung (Department of Physical Therapy, Konyang University)
  • Received : 2021.04.04
  • Accepted : 2021.05.06
  • Published : 2021.05.31

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the imaging procedure of pectoralis minor muscle thickness and assessed the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the muscle thickness measured by two raters using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) in healthy individuals. METHODS: Fifteen participants (aged 21 - 28, seven females, and eight males) were involved in the study. The primary rater palpated the coracoid process and the fourth rib, defined as the width of the index finger lateral to the sternum to avoid breast tissues, and lined the two landmarks. The second examiner checked 1 / 3 (1st point) and 1 / 2 (2nd point) of the line length as measurement points. The two raters obtained right side muscle images of the participants at a standardized sitting position using RUSI with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer at 40mm depth. For intra-rater reliability, the principal rater took three images per point and tried to take one more with an interval. For the inter-rater reliability, the other rater performed the same tasks as the principal rater on the same day. The reliability was analyzed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of the measurement (SEM), and Bland and Altman plots. RESULTS: The reliability at all points was excellent for the same rater (ICC3,1 = .973 - .978, SEM = .042 - .046), and between raters (ICC2,1 = .939 - .959, SEM = .059 - .097). CONCLUSION: These findings show that the RUSI could be reliable for examining the pectoralis minor muscle thickness in healthy individuals at all measurement sites.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank Professor Chang-Hyung Lee of Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital for helping with the ultrasound imaging.

References

  1. Taylor DC, Dalton JR JD, Seaber AV, et al. Viscoelastic properties of muscle-tendon units: the biomechanical effects of stretching. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(3):300-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659001800314
  2. Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther. 2000;80(3):276-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.3.276
  3. Borstad JD, Ludewig PM. The effect of long versus short pectoralis minor resting length on scapular kinematics in healthy individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(4):227-38. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.4.227
  4. Phadke V, Camargo P, Ludewig P. Scapular and rotator cuff muscle activity during arm elevation: a review of normal function and alterations with shoulder impingement. Braz J Phys Ther. 2009;13(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552009005000012
  5. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, et al. Muscles, testing and function: with posture and pain (4th ed). London. Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, MD. 1993.
  6. Sahrmann S. Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. United Statesof America. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2002.
  7. Fernandez Carnero S, Arias Buria JL, Cuenca Zaldivar JN, et al. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging evaluation in physiotherapy: piloting a systematic review. Appl Sci. 2019;9(1):181. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010181
  8. Dupont AC, Sauerbrei EE, Fenton PV, et al. Real-time sonography to estimate muscle thickness: Comparison with MRI and CT. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29(4):230-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1025
  9. Hides J, Richardson C, Jull G, et al. Ultrasound imaging in rehabilitation. Aust J Physiother. 1995;41(3):187-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60429-3
  10. Fernandez-Carnero S, Calvo-Lobo C, Garrido-Marin A, et al. 2nd Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging Symposium in Physical Therapy, Madrid, Spain, 3-5 June 2016. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:A1-A4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099763.1
  11. Teyhen D. Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging Symposium, May 8-10, 2006, San Antonio, Texas. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(8):A-1-A-17. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2006.0301
  12. Talbott NR, Witt DW. Ultrasound imaging of the serratus anterior muscle at rest and during contraction. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013;33(3):192-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12012
  13. Talbott NR, Witt DW. Ultrasound examination of the serratus anterior during scapular protraction in asymptomatic individuals: reliability and changes with contraction. PM R 2014;6(3):227-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.09.003
  14. Jeong JR, Ko YJ, Ha HG, et al. Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasonographic imaging for muscle thickness measurement of the rhomboid major. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016;36(2):134-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12206
  15. Bentman S, O'Sullivan C, Stokes M. Thickness of the middle trapezius muscle measured by rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: description of the technique and reliability study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2010;30(6):426-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.00960.x
  16. O'sullivan C, Bentman S, Bennett K, et al. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the lower trapezius muscle: technical description and reliability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(10):620-6. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2007.2446
  17. Temes W, Clifton AT, Hilton V, et al. Reliability and validity of thickness measurements of the supraspinatus muscle of the shoulder: an ultrasonography study. J Sport Rehabil. 2014;23(2):2013-23.
  18. Schneebeli A, Egloff M, Giampietro A, et al. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the supraspinatus muscle: Intra-and interrater reliability of thickness and cross-sectional area. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014;18(2):266-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.09.009
  19. Koppenhaver S, Harris D, Harris A, et al. The reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging in the measurement of infraspinatus muscle function in the symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders of patients with unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(2):128.
  20. Borstad JD. Measurement of pectoralis minor muscle length: validation and clinical application. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(4):169-74. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2008.2723
  21. Borstad JD. Resting position variables at the shoulder: evidence to support a posture-impairment association. Phys Ther. 2006;86(4):549-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/86.4.549
  22. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  23. Bland JM, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
  24. Beckerman H, Roebroeck M, Lankhorst G, et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2001;10(7):571-8. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013138911638
  25. Koo TK, Wong C, Zheng Y. Reliability of sonomyography for pectoralis major thickness measurement. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010;33(5):386-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.05.009
  26. Lee S-J, Lim JY, Lee C-H, et al. Intra-and inter-rater reliability of muscle thickness measurement of the tibialis anterior using different inward pressures. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;8(4):218-24.
  27. Kristjansson E. Reliability of ultrasonography for the cervical multifidus muscle in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. Man Ther. 2004;9(2):83-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1356-689X(03)00059-6