Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research

Center for Asian Public Opinion Research & Collaboration Initiative (충남대학교 아시아여론조사학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Roots and Drivers of the Color-based Polarizations in Thailand

  • Received : 2021.01.13
  • Accepted : 2021.03.17
  • Published : 2021.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

What is the basis of the political polarization in Thailand? What are the key differences between the opposing camps? This paper aims to answer these questions at the individual level, using a national survey conducted by the authors between July and August 2017. The paper argues that the color-based polarizations in Thailand are significant and deeply rooted in a complicated array of demographic, attitudinal, and political dimensions. That is, despite their relative differences in demographics and socioeconomic status, the Yellow Shirt and Red Shirt supporters differ in party identification and democratic values. This finding indicates that the struggle between the conflicting groups in this country is not just about competing interests, but about the identities and basic values underlying the "rules of the political game."

Keywords

References

  1. Asia Foundation. (2011) The 2010 national survey of the Thai electorate: exploring national consensus and color polarization. The Asia Foundation.
  2. Carothers, T., & O'Donohue, A. (2019). Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization. Brookings Institution Press.
  3. Charoensin-o-larn, C. (2013). Redrawing Thai political space: The red shirt movement. In T. Bunnell, D. Parthasarathy, & E. C. Thompson (Eds.), Cleavage, connection and conflict in rural, urban and contemporary Asia (pp. 201-21). Springer..
  4. Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American Public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 563-88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836
  5. Forsyth, T. (2010). Thailand's Red shirt protests: Popular movement or dangerous street theatre? Social Movement Studies, 9(4), 461-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2010.522313
  6. Funston, J. (2009). Introduction. In J. Funston (Ed.), Divided over Thaksin: Thailand's coup and problematic transition (pp. xiii-xxi). ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
  7. Hewison, K. (2014). Thailand: The lessons of protest. Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia 50(1): 1-15.
  8. Hewison, K. (2015). Thailand: Contestation over elections, sovereignty and representation. Representation, 50(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2015.1011459
  9. Huang, K.-P., & Thananithichot, S. (2018). Social divisions, party support, and the changes in the Thai party system since 2001. International Area Studies Review, 21(3), 214-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865918776849
  10. Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
  11. Jager, K. (2012). Why did Thailand's middle class turn against a democratically elected government? The information-gap hypothesis. Democratization, 19(6), 1138-1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.623353
  12. Laothamathas, A. (1996). A tale of two democracies: Conflicting perceptions of elections and democracy in Thailand. In R. H. Taylor((Ed.), The politics of elections in Southeast Asia (pp. 201-223). Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
  13. McCargo, D. (2017). Thailand's urbanized villagers and political polarization. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 365-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1342985
  14. McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576
  15. Nishizaki, Y. (2014). Peasants and the redshirt movement in Thailand: Some dissenting voices. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.873409
  16. Pye, O. & Schaffar, W. (2008). The 2006 Anti-Thaksin movement in Thailand: An analysis. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 38-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701651945
  17. Siamwalla, A. & Jitsuchon, S. (2012). The socio-economic bases of the Red-Yellow divide: A statistical analysis. In M. J. Montesano, P. Chachavalpongpun, & A. Chongvilaivan (Eds.), Bangkok, May 2010: Perspectives on a divided Thailand (pp. 64-71). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  18. Sinpeng, A., & Kuhonta, E. M. (2012). From the street to the ballot box: The July 2011 elections and the rise of social movements in Thailand. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 34(3), 389-415. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs34-3d
  19. Stavrakakis Y. (2018). Paradoxes of polarization: Democracy's inherent division and the (anti-) populist challenge. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218756924
  20. Taylor, J. (2012). Remembrance and tragedy: Understanding Thailand's "Red Shirt" social movement. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 27(1), 120-152. https://doi.org/10.1353/soj.2012.0004
  21. Thabchumpon, N. & McCargo D. (2011). Urbanized villagers in the 2010 Thai Redshirt protests. Asian Survey, 51 (6), 993-1018. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2011.51.6.993
  22. Thananithichot, S. (2012). Political engagement and participation of Thai citizens: The rural-urban disparity. Contemporary Politics, 18(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2012.651274