DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cost Behavior of Decline-Stage firms with High R&D Intensity

연구개발 집약도가 높은 쇠퇴기 기업들의 원가행태

  • Oh, Sang-Hoon (Department of Accounting & Tax, Hanyang University) ;
  • Yi, Sung-Wook (Department of Buisness Administration, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2021.08.31
  • Accepted : 2021.09.21
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to analyze the cost behavior of firms, taking into account both high R&D intensity and situations in which R&D activities are likely to be performed efficiently. Design/methodology/approach - During the sample period from 2002 to 2019, regression analysis is conducted on the manufacturing firms with December fiscal year listed on KOSDAQ. The degree of R&D expenditure was measured by R&D intensity. The efficient R&D situation is measured as the decline stage firms in the KOSDAQ market, which are relatively smaller than the KOSPI market. Findings - Firms in the decline phase and high R&D intensity showed the cost stickiness. Because these firms anticipate an optimistic future, they do little to cut current costs even if their current sales decrease. Research implications or Originality - Firstly, it is confirmed that both the extent of R&D expenditure and the situation in which R&D will be effectively performed are important in the study of cost behavior. Secondly, we present a new perspective on strategy research that favors the use of cost advantage strategy related to cost anti-stickiness for the decline firms.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2019년 한양대학교 교내연구비 지원으로 연구되었음(HY-2019-G).

References

  1. Anderson, M. C., R. D. Banker and S. N. Janakiraman (2003), "Are Selling General, and Administrative Costs "Sticky"?", Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095
  2. Anthony J. and K. Ramesh (1992), "Association between Accounting Performance Measures and Stock Prices: A Test of the Life Cycle Hypothesis", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 203-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(92)90018-W
  3. Black, E. L. (1998), "Life-cycle impacts on the incremental value-relevance of earnings and cash flow measures", Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, 4, 40-56.
  4. Chen, C. H., H. Lu and T. Sougiannis (2012), "The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs", Contemporary Accounting Research, 29, 252-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x
  5. Homburg, C. and J. Nasev (2008), "How Timely are Earnings When Costs are Sticky? Implications for the Link Between Conditional Conservatism and Cost Stickiness", Working Paper Univ. of Cologne, Available from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1187082
  6. Porter, Michael E. (1996), "What Is Strategy?", Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.
  7. Weiss, D. (2010), "Cost Behavior and Analysts' Earning Forecasts", The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441-1471. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441
  8. 권세원, 최세라, 김범준, 이문영, (2018), "재벌기업의 연구개발투자 비대칭성에 대한 연구", 세무와회계저널, 19(2), 209-230.
  9. 김예경, 박원 (2019), "기업수명주기와 경영전략이 미래 성과에 미치는 영향", 국제회계연구, 83, 189-212.
  10. 김유진 (2020) "신용정보에 대한 기업의 인센티브가 원가행태에 미치는 영향 -negative outlook 기업을 중심으로-, 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문.
  11. 김유진, 정문종 (2017). "경계등급 기업의 경영자 인센티브가 원가행태에 미치는 영향", 관리회계연구, 17(3), 35-60.
  12. 문호은, 홍철규 (2010), "원가행태의 비대칭성과 산업별 특성 차이에 대한 종합적 분석", 관리회계연구, 10(1), 1-38.
  13. 유신하 (2021) "높은 연구개발 집약도를 가진 기업의 미래수익성 및 초과수익률과 신용등급 - 코스닥 쇠퇴기를 중심으로-", 한양대학교 박사학위논문.
  14. 유지연, 이상열, 박삼복 (2018) "기업수명주기가 연구개발비 지출과 기업성과 및 이익변동성의 관련성에 미치는 영향", 회계와정책연구, 23(2), 195-219.
  15. 유현수, 김갑순, 최규담 (2015), "경영전략과 자본비용", 회계저널, 24(6), 393~429.
  16. 이상열 (2013) "기업수명주기와 이익반응계수", 회계와정책연구, 18(3), 179-205.
  17. 이성욱, 이상열, 오상훈 (2013), "기업수명주기가 세계철강기업들의 비대칭적 원가행태에 미치는 영향", 국제회계연구, 51, 75-104.
  18. 정형록 (2015) "비대칭적 원가행태에 대한 연구동향", 관리회계연구, 15(2), 49-118.
  19. 조영곤, 설원식, 신혁승 (2009), "연구개발(R&D)집중도와 산업성과", 생산성논집(구 생산성연구), 23(2), 183-213.
  20. 홍난희 (2020) "기업수명주기에 따라 경영전략이 원가비대칭성에 미치는 영향", 디지털융복합연구, 18(5), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.5.145