DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Tibial Rotation on Muscle Activity and Force of Hamstring Muscle During Isometric Knee Flexion in Healthy Women

  • Ko, Min-Joo (Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, INJE University) ;
  • Kang, Min-Hyeok (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • Received : 2020.10.02
  • Accepted : 2020.10.23
  • Published : 2021.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine how the position of tibial rotation affects peak force and hamstring muscle activation during isometric knee flexion in healthy women. Methods: Seventeen healthy women performed maximum isometric knee flexion at 30˚ with three tibial rotation positions (tibial internal rotation, neutral position, and tibial external rotation). Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from the medial hamstring (MH) and lateral hamstring (LH) muscles. The strength of the knee flexor was measured with a load-cell-type strength-measurement sensor. Data were analyzed using one-way repeated analysis of variance. Results: The results showed that MH and LH activities and peak force were significantly different among the three tibial rotation conditions (p < 0.01). The post-hoc comparison revealed that the MH EMG activity in tibial neutral and internal rotation positions were significantly greater than tibial external rotation (p < 0.01). The LH activity in tibial external rotation was significantly greater than the tibial neutral position and internal rotation (p < 0.01). The peak force of the knee flexor was also greater in the external tibial rotation position compared with the tibial neutral and internal rotation positions (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that hamstring muscle activation could be changed by tibial rotation.

Keywords

References

  1. Almquist PO, Ekdahl C, Isberg PE, et al. Knee rotation in healthy individuals related to age and gender. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2013;31(1):23-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22184
  2. Beyer EB, Lunden JB, Giveans MR. Medial and lateral hamstrings response and force production at varing degrees of knee flexion and tibial rotation in healthy individuals. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2019;14(3):376-383. https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20190376
  3. Boguszewski DV, Joshi NB, Yang PR, et al. Location of the natural knee axis for internal-external tibial rotation. The Knee. 2016;23(6):1083-1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2015.11.003
  4. Brandenburg SR, Matelic TM. Loss of internal tibial rotation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2018;41(1):22-26.
  5. Felson DT. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. In: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS (eds). Oxford. Oxford University Press. 1998.
  6. Fiebert IM, Haas JM, Dworkin KJ, et al. A comparison of medial versus lateral hamstring electromyographic activity and force output during isometric contraction. Isokinetics and Exercise Science. 1992;2(2):47-55. https://doi.org/10.3233/IES-1992-2202
  7. Fiebert IM, Roach KE, Fingerhut B, et al. EMG activity of medial and lateral hamstrings at three positions of tibial rotation during low-force isometric knee flexion contraction. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 1997;8(3):215-222. https://doi.org/10.3233/bmr-1997-8306
  8. Fiebert IM, Spielholz NI, Applegate EB, et al. Comparison of EMG activity of medial and lateral hamstrings during isometric contractions at various cuff weight loads. The Knee. 2001;8(2):145-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(00)00079-X
  9. Herzog W, Read LJ. Lines of action and moment arms of the major force-carrying structures crossing the human knee joint. Journal of anatomy. 1993;182(Pt 2):213-230.
  10. Houck J. Muscle activation patterns of selected lower extremity muscles during stepping and cutting tasks. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2003;13(6):545-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00056-7
  11. Lynn SK, Costigan PA. Changes in the medial-lateral hamstring activation ratio with foot rotation during lower limb exercise. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2009;19(3):197-205.
  12. Matsumoto H, Seedhom BB, Suda Y, et al. Axis location of tibial rotation and its change with flexion angle. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2000;371:178-182. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200002000-00022
  13. Mohamed O, Perry J, Hislop H. Relationship between wire EMG activity, muscle length, and torque of the hamstrings. Clinical Biomechanics. 2002;17(8):569-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00070-0
  14. Mohamed O, Perry J, Hislop H. Synergy of medial and lateral hamstrings at three positions of tibial rotation during maximum isometric knee flexion. The Knee. 2003;10(3):277-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00140-0
  15. Norkin CC, Levangie PK. Joint structure and function: a comprehensive analysis, 2nd ed. Philadelphia. F.A. Davis Company. 1992.
  16. Onishi H, Yagi R, Oyama M et al. EMG-angle relationship of the hamstring muscles during maximum knee flexion. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2002;12(5):399-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00033-0
  17. Park HS, Wilson NA, Zhang LQ. Gender differences in passive knee biomechanical properties in tibial rotation. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2008;26(7):937-944. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20576
  18. Sullivan MK, Dejulia JJ, Worrell TW. Effect of pelvic position and stretching method on hamstring muscle flexibility. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 1992;24(12):1383-1389.
  19. Velotta J, Weyer J, Ramirez A, et al. Relationship between leg dominance tests and type of task. ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive. 2011.
  20. Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, et al. Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1983;179:275-283.
  21. Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Asselman P, et al. Muscle flexibility as a risk factor for developing muscle injuries in male professional soccer players. A prospective study. The American journal of sports medicine. 2003;31(1):41-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465030310011801