Impacts on the Support to Start-up Venture Company using Public Purchases

공공조달수요를 통한 창업벤처기업 지원의 거시경제 파급효과

  • Received : 2021.03.04
  • Accepted : 2021.04.28
  • Published : 2021.04.30

Abstract

This study analyzed the ripple effect of the demand-side support for start-up venture companies on the macro economy using Dynamic General Equilibrium model. In the model, start-up venture companies were expressed in a manner that distinguished between workers and entrepreneurs by applying the span of control in the Lucas(1978). As a result of the analysis, when the share of public procurement of start-up venture companies was increased from 5.7% to 10%, the actual production of start-up venture companies increased by about 46.17% and the number of venture companies increased by about 150%. In addition, it was analyzed that the number of jobs through venture companies increased by about 61.56%. In addition, it was found that the economic effect was greatly reduced when the start-up venture company was supported as a subsidy for the supply sector with the same amount as the public procurement support. This is interpreted as the fact that if the government implements the supply-side support policy, the expansion of supply causes the price of start-up venture companies to fall, reducing the effect of the support policy in half. Therefore, when supporting start-up venture companies, the government should make efforts to maximize the policy effect by expanding the demand-side support through public procurement and reducing the payment of simple subsidies to start-up venture companies.

본 연구는 창업벤처기업에 대한 수요 측 지원이 거시경제에 미치는 파급효과를 분석한 것이다. 분석모형은 Lucas(1978)의 기업가의 통제범위 모형을 준용한 동태일반균형모형을 활용하였다. 분석결과 창업벤처기업의 공공조달 비중을 5.7%에서 10%로 확대시켰을 때, 창업벤처기업의 실질생산이 약 46.17% 증가하고 벤처기업 수는 약 150%가 증가하는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 벤처기업을 통한 일자리는 약 61.56% 증가하는 것으로 분석되었다. 그리고 공공조달 지원과 동일한 금액을 공급부문에 대한 지원금으로 창업벤처기업에 지원해 줄 경우 경제적 효과는 크게 줄어드는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 정부가 공급 측 지원 정책을 실시하면 공급 확대가 창업벤처기업제품의 가격 하락을 야기해 지원정책의 효과를 반감시키기 때문으로 풀이된다. 따라서 정부는 창업벤처기업 지원 시 공공조달을 통한 수요 측 지원을 확대하고 창업벤처기업에 대한 단순 지원금 지급을 축소함으로써 정책효과를 극대화 하려는 노력을 기울여야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chari, V. V., Kehoe, P. J., & McGrattan, E. R.(2000). Sticky price models of the business cycle: can the contract multiplier solve the persistence problem?. Econometrica, 68(5), 1151-1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00154
  2. Choi, J. H., Lee, K. H., Seo, J. Y., Kim, S. J., Lee S. H. & Kim, B. G.(2014). Improvement strategies of public procurement market policy for fostering technology based innovative. SMEs(2014-09), Seoul: Science and Technology policy institute.
  3. Choi, H. G.(2006). Zipf Plots and the Size Distribution of Korean Firms, Journal of Korean official statistics, 11(2), 73-95.
  4. Eden, M., & Gaggle, P.(2014). The Substitution of ICT capital for routine labor: transitional dynamics and long-run implication. charlotte: UNC Charlotte Economics Working Paper.
  5. Guner, N., Ventura, G., & Xu, Y.(2008). Macroeconomic Implication of Size-Dependent Policies. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4), 721-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2008.01.005
  6. Hansen, G. D.(1985). Indivisible labor and the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics. 16(3), 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(85)90039-X
  7. Hong, J. H., & Kang T. S.(2015). Population Ageing and Extension of Retirement Age. BOK Working Paper(2015-10), Seoul: Bank of Korea
  8. Kim, J. H., & Kim, B. G.(2019). Innovation, Public Procurement, Technological Progress, Dynamic General equilibrium Model. Journal of Scientific Technological Policy, 2(2), 247-270.
  9. Kim, J. H., & Park, S. B.(2019). Macroeconomic Impact of Public Procurement Support for Technology based Innovative SMEs. Journal of SME Policy, 4(3), 35-70.
  10. Kim, H. K., Yoo, J. M., & Oh, K. Y.(2016). The effects of Venture business finance supporting programs on efficiency and productivity of venture firms using Data envelops analysis. Journal of the korean association of small business studies, 38(3), 165-184.
  11. Kim, S. S., Kim, J. W., & Yang, Y. S.(2012). A study on assessing positive impact to small business startups by government policy of promoting small business. Asia-Pacific Journal of business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.7.2.201207.167
  12. Kim, Y. J., Suh, Y. K., & Hong, J. I.(2018). Venture firm, Internal competency, Growth stage, Management performance, Government funding, Moderate effect. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 21(2), 636-662.
  13. Lee, J. H., & Yoo, H. S.(2020). Domestic innovation procurement policy trend from a SW perspective. Monthly Software oriented society, 75, 13-17.
  14. Lee, M. C., & Jung, T. H.(2018). The Effects of Public Procurement on the Growth of Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of the korean association of small business studies, 40(4), 33-50.
  15. Lucas, R. E.(1978). On the Size Distribution of Business Firms. Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 508-523. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003596