Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow

Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society (대한견·주관절의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mid-term outcomes of bony increased offset-reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the Asian population

  • Tankshali, Kirtan (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Suh, Dong-Whan (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Ji, Jong-Hun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Yeon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2021.02.14
  • Accepted : 2021.05.05
  • Published : 2021.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: To evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of bony increased offset-reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) in the Asian population at mid-term follow-up. Methods: From June 2012 to August 2017 at a single center, 43 patients underwent BIO-RSA, and 38 patients with minimum 2 years follow-up were enrolled. We evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications at the last follow-up. In addition, we divided these patients into notching and no-notching groups and compared the demographics, preoperative, and postoperative characteristics of patients. Results: Visual analogue scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Scale, and Simple Shoulder Test scores improved significantly from preoperative (5.00, 3.93, 1.72, 3.94) to postoperative (1.72, 78.91, 28.34, 7.66) (p<0.05) outcomes. All range of motion except internal rotation improved significantly at the final follow-up (p<0.05), and the bone graft was well-incorporated with the native glenoid in all patients (100%). However, scapular notching was observed in 20 of 38 patients (53%). In the comparison between notching and no-notching groups (18 vs. 20 patients), there were no significant differences in demographics, radiological parameters, and clinical outcomes except acromion-greater tuberosity (AT) distance (p=0.003). Intraoperative complications included three metaphyseal fractures and one inferior screw malposition. Postoperative complications included ectopic ossification, scapular neck stress fracture, humeral stem relaxation, and late infection in one case each. Conclusions: BIO-RSA showed improved clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up in Asian population. However, we observed higher scapular notching compared to the previous studies. In addition, adequate glenoid lateralization with appropriate humeral lengthening (AT distance) might reduce scapular notching.

Keywords

References

  1. Flatow EL, Harrison AK. A history of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2432-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1733-6
  2. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I. Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006;15:527-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.003
  3. Gilot G, Alvarez-Pinzon AM, Wright TW, et al. The incidence of radiographic aseptic loosening of the humeral component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24:1555-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.007
  4. Gutierrez S, Comiskey CA 4th, Luo ZP, Pupello DR, Frankle MA. Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:2606-15. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00012
  5. Huri G, Familiari F, Salari N, Petersen SA, Doral MN, McFarland EG. Prosthetic design of reverse shoulder arthroplasty contributes to scapular notching and instability. World J Orthop 2016;7:738-45. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i11.738
  6. Chae SW, Lee H, Kim SM, Lee J, Han SH, Kim SY. Primary stability of inferior tilt fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element study. J Orthop Res 2016;34:1061-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23115
  7. Tashjian RZ, Burks RT, Zhang Y, Henninger HB. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation of humeral and glenosphere hardware configuration. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24:e68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.017
  8. Harman M, Frankle M, Vasey M, Banks S. Initial glenoid component fixation in "reverse" total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14(1 Suppl S):162S-167S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.030
  9. Boileau P, Moineau G, Roussanne Y, O'Shea K. Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2558-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1775-4
  10. Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:756-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90232-2
  11. Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y. Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears: a long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;(254):92-6.
  12. Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14(1 Suppl S):147S-161S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006
  13. Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff: results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:388-95.
  14. Kirzner N, Paul E, Moaveni A. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs BIO-RSA: clinical and radiographic outcomes at short term follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 2018;13:256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0955-2
  15. Collin P, Liu X, Denard PJ, Gain S, Nowak A, Ladermann A. Standard versus bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.020
  16. Athwal GS, MacDermid JC, Reddy KM, Marsh JP, Faber KJ, Drosdowech D. Does bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty decrease scapular notching. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24:468-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.015
  17. Boileau P, Morin-Salvo N, Gauci MO, Seeto BL, Chalmers PN, Holzer N, et al. Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017;26:2133-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.024
  18. Cabezas AF, Krebes K, Hussey MM, et al. Morphologic variability of the shoulder between the populations of North American and East Asian. Clin Orthop Surg 2016;8:280-7. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2016.8.3.280
  19. Ji JH, Jeong JY, Song HS, Ok JH, Yang SJ, Jeon BK, et al. Early clinical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the Korean population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:1102-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.019
  20. Athwal GS, Faber KJ. Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a mini 25-mm glenoid baseplate. Int Orthop 2016;40:109-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2945-x
  21. de Wilde LF, Poncet D, Middernacht B, Ekelund A. Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Acta Orthop 2010;81:719-26. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.538354
  22. Friedman RJ, Barcel DA, Eichinger JK. Scapular notching in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27:200-9. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00026
  23. Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Gerber C. Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14:524-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.010
  24. Torrens C, Guirro P, Miquel J, Santana F. Influence of glenosphere size on the development of scapular notching: a prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25:1735-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.006
  25. Werner BS, Chaoui J, Walch G. Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2018;100:1182-6. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0264.R1
  26. Cuff D, Clark R, Pupello D, Frankle M. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1996-2000. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01206
  27. Grey B, Rodseth RN, Roche SJ. Humeral stem loosening following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBJS Rev 2018;6:e5. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00129
  28. Franceschetti E, Ranieri R, Giovanetti de Sanctis E, Palumbo A, Franceschi F. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020;29:58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.023
  29. Ascione F, Kilian CM, Laughlin MS, et al. Increased scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a humeral onlay short stem: an analysis of 485 consecutive cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:2183-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.007
  30. Verhofste B, Decock T, Van Tongel A, De Wilde L. Heterotopic ossification after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2016;98:1215-21. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.37761
  31. Jacquot A, Sirveaux F, Roche O, Favard L, Clavert P, Mole D. Surgical management of the infected reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a French multicenter study of reoperation in 32 patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24:1713-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.03.007