실천공학교육논문지 (Journal of Practical Engineering Education)

  • 제13권1호
  • /
  • Pages.39-50
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2288-405X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4068(eISSN)
한국실천공학교육학회 (Korean Institute for Pratical Engineering Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경영학 전공자들의 IT 실습 교과목에 대한 인식: 기대가치이론을 중심으로

The Perception of Business Administration Major Students on Course with IT Practice: Focused on Expectancy Value Theory

  • 이준영 (한국기술교육대학교 산업경영학부) ;
  • 신세인 (충북대학교 사범대학 생물교육과)
  • Lee, Junyeong (School of Industrial Management, Korea University of Technology and Education) ;
  • Shin, Sein (Department of Biology Education, College of Education, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.08.08
  • 심사 : 2020.10.19
  • 발행 : 2021.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 IT 비전공자인 경영학 전공 대학생들을 대상으로 IT 실습 교과목에 대한 인식을 기대 가치 이론에 기반하여 도출하고, 이를 개선하기 위한 방안을 제안하고자 한다. 이를 위해IT 실습 교과목을 수강하는 102명의 학생들을 대상으로 온라인 개방형 설문조사를 실시하고, 질적 내용 분석을 활용하여 학생들의 인식을 선행연구와 연결하여 밝혔다. 분석 결과, 총 4개의 상위범주 (난이도 인식, 기대, 가치, 비용) 에 8개의 하위범주(생소한 용어, 생소한 소프트웨어, 수학적 개념과 사고의 어려움, 낮은 효능감, 내재적 가치, 성취 가치, 활용 가치, 많은 시간 소요)의 인식을 도출하였고, 이를 바탕으로 경영학 전공 대학생들의 IT 실습 교과목 학습을 도울 수 있는 개선 방안을 제안하였다. 본 연구는 경영학과 학생들을 중심으로 학습자 관점에서 비전공자의 IT 실습 교과목에 대한 인식들을 실증적으로 살펴보았다는 점에서 학문적 의의가 있으며, 도출한 인식들을 바탕으로 실제 교육 현장에 적용해 볼 수 있는 방안을 제시하였다는 점에서 실질적 시사점이 있다.

This study attempted to explore the perception of business administration major students on course with IT practice based on expectancy-value theory, and suggested educational implications for improving course with IT practice for non-IT major students. Open-ended survey was conducted via online from 102 students who took course with IT practice, and response data was analyzed through qualitative content analysis. As a result, 4 main categories (perceived difficulty, expectation, value, cost) and 8 subcategories (unfamiliar terms, unfamiliar software, difficulty in mathematical concepts and thinking, low efficacy, intrinsic value, attainment value, utility value, long time required for learning) were revealed, and we provided educational suggestions that help to enhance IT practice learning for business administration major students (non-IT major students). This study has academic implication by empirically examining the perception of business administration major students based on expectancy value theory from the learner perspective, and also has practical implication via suggesting educational implications that could be applied to the substantive educational field based on the revealed students' perceptions.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2019년도 한국기술교육대학교 신임교수 연구과제 지원에 의하여 연구되었음.

참고문헌

  1. G. J. Park and Y. J. Choi, "Exploratory study on the direction of software education for the non-major undergraduate students," Journal of Education & Culture, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 273-292, 2018. https://doi.org/10.24159/JOEC.2018.24.4.273
  2. E. J. Chang and J. K. Kim, "A study on the influence factors of the coding course attendance: focused on business administration major," Management Education Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 139-163, 2019.
  3. M. Nam, "Final selection of five SW-centered universities in 2018," Ministry of Science and ICT, 2018.
  4. IITP, "Spreading SW education innovation through operation of SW-centered universities in regional track," Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation, 2018.
  5. M. Kim, "Current status and implications of domestic and overseas SW education for training SW human resource," NIPA Issue Report: National IT Industry Promotion Agency, 2018.
  6. H. Kim, M. Lee, I. Yoon, and Y. Park, "Strategies for competency education on SW convergence in the fourth industrial revolution," Presidential Advisory Council on Science and Technology, 2017.
  7. J.-E. Nah, "Software education needs analysis in liberal arts," Korean Journal of General Education, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 63-89, 2017.
  8. W. S. Kim, "A study on the recognition of freshman on computational thinking as essential course," Culture and Convergence, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 141-170, 2017. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2017.12.39.6.141
  9. J. Seo, "A case study on programming learning of non-SW majors for SW convergence education," Journal of Digital Convergence, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 123-132, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.7.123
  10. S.-Y. Pi, "A study on coding education of non-computer majors for IT convergence education," Journal of Digital Convergence, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1-8, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.10.1
  11. A. Bandura, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.
  12. D. H. Schunk and E. L. Usher, "Social cognitive theory and motivation," In: Ryan, R.M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation, New York Oxford University Press, pp. 11-26, 2012.
  13. D. Palmer, "A motivational view of constructivist-informed teaching," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 1853-1881, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339654
  14. J. E. Brophy, Motivating Students to Learn, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004.
  15. P. R. Pintrich, "A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 667-686, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
  16. A. Wigfield and J. S. Eccles, "Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation," Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 68-81, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  17. A. Wigfield and J. S. Eccles, "Children's competence beliefs, achievement values, and general self-esteem: Change across elementary and middle school," The Journal of Early Adolescence, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 107-138, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1177/027243169401400203
  18. A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: W. H. Freeman & Co, 1997.
  19. J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, "In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 215-225, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213003
  20. J. Eccles, "Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices," International Journal of Behavioral Development, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 195-201, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411398185
  21. J. Song, Y. Chung, P. Kang, and E. Son, "Motivation profile analysis of college students in STEM major based on their major's expectancy and value, and cost perception," The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 285-306, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17286/KJEP.2020.34.2.03
  22. P. R. Pintrich and D. H. Schunk, Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall, 2002.
  23. E. L. Deci, R. Koestner, and R. M. Ryan, "Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again," Review of Educational Research, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1-27, 2001. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001001
  24. P. Xiang, R. E. McBride, and M. A. Solmon, "Motivational climates in ten teachers' elementary physical education classes: An achievement goal theory approach," The Elementary School Journal, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 71-91, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1086/499743
  25. S. K. Green, "Using an expectancy-value approach to examine teachers' motivational strategies," Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 989-1005, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00055-0
  26. M. Lepper and M. Hodell, "Intrinsic motivation in the classroom," In: Ames, C., and Ames, R. (eds.), Research on Motivation in Education: Goals and Cognitions, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 73-105, 1989.
  27. F. Pajares, "Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning," Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 116-125, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8
  28. P. P. McCabe, "Enhancing self-efficacy for high-stakes reading tests," The Reading Teacher, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 12-20, 2003.
  29. I. C. Moura and N. van Hattum-Janssen, "Teaching a CS introductory course: An active approach," Computers & Education, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 475-483, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.009
  30. Y.-S. Son and K.-J. Lee, "Computational thinking teaching model design for activating IT convergence education," The Journal of the Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 511-522, 2016. https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2016.11.5.511
  31. K. Kim and H. Kim, "A case study on necessity of computer programming for interdisciplinary education," Journal of Digital Convergence, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 339-348, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.11.339
  32. J. D. Wall and J. Knapp, "Learning computing topics in undergraduate information systems courses: Managing perceived difficulty," Journal of Information Systems Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 245-259, 2014.
  33. D. F. Shell and L.-K. Soh, "Profiles of motivated self-regulation in college computer science courses: Differences in major versus required non-major courses," Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 899-913, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9437-9
  34. S. Kim, "Analysis of non-computer majors' difficulties in computational thinking education," The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 49-57, 2015. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2015.18.3.005
  35. N. L. Sproull, Handbook of Research Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Students in the Social Sciences, Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2002.
  36. P. I. Erickson and C. P. Kaplan, "Maximizing qualitative responses about smoking in structured interviews," Qualitative Health Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 829-840, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118859
  37. A. Ardichvili, V. Page, and T. Wentling, "Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice," Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 64-77, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310463626
  38. J. Y. Cho and E.-H. Lee, "Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences," The Qualitative Report, vol. 19, no. 32, pp. 1-20, 2014.
  39. L. Richards, Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005.
  40. S. B. Merriam, Qualitative Research In Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis, San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass, 2002.
  41. S. Elo and H. Kyngas, "The qualitative content analysis process," Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 107-115, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  42. P. Burnard, "A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research," Nurse Education Today, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 461-466, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-6917(91)90009-Y
  43. H.-F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, "Three approaches to qualitative content analysis," Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277-1288, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  44. B. W. Winslow, "Family caregivers' experiences with community services: a qualitative analysis," Public Health Nursing, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 341-348, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1446.2003.20502.x
  45. C. J. Atman, D. Kilgore, and A. McKenna, "Characterizing design learning: A mixed-methods study of engineering designers' use of language," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 309-326, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00981.x
  46. K. S. Tang and P. J. Williams, "STEM literacy or literacies? Examining the empirical basis of these constructs," Review of Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 675-697, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3162
  47. F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319-340, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  48. J. M. Wing, "Computational thinking," Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 33-35, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  49. M. Paechter, D. Macher, K. Martskvishvili, S. Wimmer, and I. Papousek, "Mathematics anxiety and statistics anxiety. Shared but also unshared components and antagonistic contributions to performance in statistics," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, pp. 1196, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01196
  50. D. F. Shell, D. W. Brooks, G. Trainin, K. Wilson, D. F. Kauffman, and L. Herr. The Unified Learning Model: How Motivational, Cognitive, and Neurobiological Sciences Inform Best Teaching Practices, Netherlands: Springer, 2010.
  51. S. M. Glynn, P. Brickman, N. Armstrong, and G. Taasoobshirazi, "Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1159-1176, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442